۔منکرین آخرت و رسالت سے تخاطب اور استفہامی اسلوب
ایمان بالآخرة یا عقیدہ آخرت ارکانِ ایمان میں سے ایک رکن ہے ، قرآن مجید میں منکرین آخرت و رسالت کو اس اہم حقیقیت کیلئے دلائل دیتے ہوئے اللہ تعالیٰ نے استفہامی اسلوب کو اختیار کیا ہے،ذیل میں عقیدہ آخرت کے بارے میں آیات استفہام پیش کی جا رہی ہیں:
۱-سورة المآئدہ میں ارشاد باری تعالیٰ ہے:
"يَوْمَ يَجْمَعُ ٱللَّهُ ٱلرُّسُلَ فَيَقُولُ مَاذَآ أُجَبْتُمْ قَالُواْ لاَ عِلْمَ لَنَآ إِنَّكَ أَنتَ عَلاَّمُ ٱلْغُيُوبِ"۔[[1]]
"جس دن اللہ جمع کرے گا سب پیغمبروں کو پھر کہے گا تم کو کیا جواب ملا تھا؟ وہ کہیں گے ہم کو خبر نہیں تو ہی چھپی باتوں کو جاننے والا ہے"۔
ابن جریر طبریؒ اس آیت کی تفسیر سے متعلق رقمطراز ہیں:
“'وہ دن کیسا ہولناک ہوگا جس روز اللہ تعالیٰ تمام پیغمبروں کو مع ان کی امتوں کے جمع کریں گے اس دن اول سے آخر تک پیدا ہونے والے سب انسان اس میدان میں حاضر ہونگے اور سب سے انکے عمر بھر کے اعمال کا حساب لیا جائے گا اللہ تعالیٰ فرمائیں گے کہ اے نبیوں جب تم نے اپنی قوم کو دین حق کی طرف بلایا تھا تو انہوں نے کیا جواب دیا تھا؟اس سوال کے مخاطب اگرچہ انبیاء کرام ہونگے مگر سنانا امتوں کو ھوگا انبیاء کرام عرض کریں گے کہ اے اللہ! بظاہر تو ہم کو جو معلوم ہیں وہ بیان کر دیں گے مگر انکے دل میں جو کچھ ہے اسکی ہمیں خبر نہیں اس کو آپ ہی جانتے ہیں کیونکہ بیشک آپ پوشیدہ باتوں کے پورے جاننے والے ہیں ہم لاعلم ہیں اور انبیاء کرام صرف اپنی...
Ka’ab bin Zuhair recited his famous poem of praise for the Prophet (s.a.w) in his presence and received his cloth as a gift in return. His poem has been narrated in the collections of Hadis and Seerah along with its notable presence in the Arabic literature. Allama Jalal ud Din as-Suyūṭī has written a detailed explanation on this poem with the title of Kunhul Murad fi bayan Banat Suaad. This article describes the back ground of the poem and then focuses on the approach adopted by Allama Suyūṭī in his explanations and gives an analysis on his style. As he has adopted the classical approach for the explanation therefore, his work is quite elaborate and consists wide range of related information which has made it one of the most popular explanation of the poem Banat Suaad. This study explains his methodology along with examples from his work.
The study aimed at evaluating the effectiveness of cooperative learning method in the subject of English. This study was focused to find the effect of cooperative learning and traditional learning on the achievement in reading comprehension and achievement in writing ability of the students of class VIII in the subject of English. It was an experimental study in which cooperative learning method was compared with traditional learning method. Cooperative learning refers to instructional strategy in which pairs or small groups of learners with different levels of ability work together to accomplish a shared goal. The aim of this cooperation is for learners to maximize their own and each others’ learning. Government Comprehensive Boys High School Rawalpindi was selected as a sample through purposive sampling. Students were divided equally on the basis of teacher-made pretest scores. Low achievers, high achievers and average students were divided in both the groups equally. Sample size was 128, Sixty-four students were included in experimental group and sixty-four students were placed in control group. Pretest, posttest equivalent group design was xviused. Treatment of planned cooperative learning technique (STAD) was provided to experimental group while control group was taught by using traditional learning method for a period of 56 days (eight weeks). At the end of the treatment, a teacher made posttest was administered to measure the achievement in reading comprehension and achievement in writing ability of the students. Same teacher taught reading and writing skills to both the groups. One with cooperative learning method and the other with the traditional learning method. Five lessons from the textbook for 8 th class were taken for reading comprehension. Thirteen exercises from grammar book for 8 th class were taken for writing ability. To determine the effect of cooperative learning method on achievement in reading comprehension and writing ability the significance of difference between the scores of groups at 0.05 level was tested by applying t-test and analysis of variance. Data analysis reveals that both the experimental and control groups were almost equal in reading comprehension and writing ability at the beginning of the experiment. The experimental group outscored significantly the control group on posttest showing the supremacy of cooperative learning method over traditional learning method. Hence, the ultimate result of the study indicated that cooperative learning method was more effective for English as compared to the traditional learning method. Furthermore, cooperative learning appeared to be more favourable for overcrowded classes.