متوازن شخصیت: تعلیم و تربیت کا نبوی اصول

A child born with a soul of being, but has lack of personality. Actually personality comes with the effect of good education, guidance, squatter and environment in which a child lives. But literally due to the teachings of Hinduism or Buddhism or Christianity a human existence proves oneself with a personality. Even western civilization has an ideal concept of personality, but human personality has its very strong roots in Islamic teachings as Holy Qur’ān gives us a first-hand description about an “Ideal Personality”. According to the “Sunnah” of Prophet Muhammad (r) man has some qualities of “moderation” which can be the dominant in excess of his existence. So, man should establish equilibrium regards his personality. But there is need to create stability in education, society and politics on the basis of “moderation”. Islam lays a great emphasis on character building. Balanced personality is based on all the best qualities of head and heart. Our Holly Prophet’s (r) personality is an excellent example of balanced personality. In Islamic perspective just to accept the characteristics and Sunnah of Muhammad (r) can be equal to the modern word of personality. But have we absorbed the ultimate concept of personality? Which personality can we call an ideal personality? These two questions are very significant to wonder about on the concept of ideal personality. Every religion and civilization has its own true meaning of ideal personality, but besides all this according to Quran the ideal personality is concealed in a word “Sunnah”. The article highlights on basic characteristics of ideal personality in the light of teachings of Holly Prophet (r). Balanced and Moderate personality is the basic principle of Prophets Teachings

Sustainable Management of Spotted Bollworms, Earias Vittella Fabricius and Earias Insulana Boisduval , Lepidoptera: Noctuidae on Okra, Abelmoschus Esculentus L. in Punjab, Pakistan

The studies were conducted to determine the resistant/susceptible responses based on fruit and shoot infestation (%) in various okra genotypes against Earias vittella (Fab.) and E. insulana (Boisd.) under field conditions during 2006 and 2007. From the preliminary screening trial during 2006, among 30 genotypes of okra Parbani kranti (18.93%), Pusa sawani (17.89%), and Ikra-1 (17.32%) appeared as susceptible while Diksha (8.17%) and Sabz pari (8.36%) appeared as resistant based on fruit infestation were selected for final screening trial during 2007. Almost similar results were observed regarding shoot infestation caused by Earias spp. in different genotypes of okra during 2006. Maximum fruit infestation during 2007 was 19.73 followed by 18.49 percent on Parbani kranti and minimum (10.46 percent) was observed on Diksha, whereas maximum shoot infestation was on Parbani kranti (35.43) and minimum was found on Diksha (12.74 percent). On an average basis of both years’ studies, the maximum HPSI based on fruit infestation was recorded to be 16 percent each on Parbani kranti and the genotype Diksha was proved to be comparatively resistant with minimum HPSI i.e., 7 percent. The genotype Diksha were again found to be resistant based on shoot infestation with minimum HPSI i.e. 6 percent while maximum HPSI (15 percent) was observed each in Parbani kranti, Pusa sawai and Ikra-1, (15 %) and appeared as comparatively resistant and susceptible genotypes, respectively. All the weather factors showed significant correlation with the fruit infestation during both year studies as well as on average basis except minimum temperature during 2006 which had non significant effect on the fruit infestation fluctuation. Maximum temperature, minimum temperature and average temperatures showed positive effect whereas relative humidity and rainfall exerted negative correlation on the fruit infestation during 2006 and 2007 separately as well as on cumulative basis. Multiple Linear Regression Models revealed that maximum temperature was the most important factor which contributed maximum for fruit and shoot infestation i.e. 60.50 and 53.20% for average of both the study years, respectively. The impact of all the factors on an average of both the study years when computed together was found to be 67.00 and 55.50%, for fruit and shoot infestation, respectively. Amongst various physio-morphic plant characters, ten fruit weight, fruit yield per plant and fruit length showed negative and significant correlation with the fruit infestationcaused by Earias spp. on okra, whereas hair density on midrib, hair length on vein, hair density on lamina and thickness of leaf lamina exerted positive and significant correlation on the fruit infestation. Plant height, number of primary branches, leaf moisture, hair length on midrib, hair density on vein, hair length on lamina, hair density and length on fruits, leaf area and fruit weight showed non significant correlation with the fruit infestation. Amongst chemical plant characters, crude protein, nitrogen, total lipids, reducing sugars, non reducing sugars, cellulose, lignin, NDF, total minerals, potassium, phosphorus, magnesium and copper had significant and positive correlation with the fruit infestation whereas manganese and zinc contents in the fruits of okra showed negative and significant correlation with the fruit infestation. Hemi cellulose and ADF showed non significant correlation with the fruit infestation. Multivariate linear regression models revealed that hair density on midrib was the most important physical character which showed significantly negative impact and contributed 42.7 % role in the fluctuation of fruit infestation followed by ten fruit weight, fruit yield per plant, hair density on lamina, hair length on vein and hair length on lamina with 31.4, 15.5, 0.8, 0.5, and 0.1 % contribution, respectively. The 100 R 2 values were observed to be 91.0 when the effect of all the physio-morphic plant characters analyzed together. Crude protein was the most important character which showed positive and significant impact in the fluctuation of fruit infestation and contributed 79.9% role followed by reducing sugars with 12.6 % role in fluctuation of fruit infestation caused by Earias spp. on okra. Various practices viz. release of Trichogramma, weeding/hoeing, neem extract, hand picking and spray of Tracer for the control of Earias spp. were applied singly and in their possible combinations in the research areas of PARS, UAF and ERI, Faisalabad during 2007 on a resistant genotype of Okra (Diksha). All the treatments showed significant difference with one another on fruit and shoot infestation caused by Earias spp. on okra. Hand picking and spray of Tracer was found to be the most effective resulted in minimum fruit infestation i.e. 7.87% followed by the spray of Tracer only with 8.37% fruit infestation as against 25.46% in control treatment. Spray of Tracer showed minimum shoot infestation i.e. 11.26% followed by T11 (hand picking + spray of Tracer) with 12.52% shoot infestation. Application of hand picking + neem extract and Tracer resulted in maximum increase in yield over control i.e. 56.61 kg/ha and found to be the most benefited to the farmers with actual CBR of 1:20.28.