Search or add a thesis

Advanced Search (Beta)
Home > Role of Six Sigma in Quality Improvement

Role of Six Sigma in Quality Improvement

Thesis Info

Author

Mehboob Ali

Supervisor

Faqir Muhammad

Institute

Allama Iqbal Open University

Institute Type

Public

City

Islamabad

Country

Pakistan

Thesis Completing Year

2013

Thesis Completion Status

Completed

Page

xiv, 74 .

Subject

Management & Auxiliary Services

Language

English

Other

Call No: 658.562 MER; Publisher: Aiou

Added

2021-02-17 19:49:13

Modified

2023-01-06 19:20:37

ARI ID

1676710406235

Similar


Loading...
Loading...

Similar Books

Loading...

Similar Chapters

Loading...

Similar News

Loading...

Similar Articles

Loading...

Similar Article Headings

Loading...

حالات زندگی

حالات زندگی

اصلاحی کا تعلق اعظم گڑھ کی مشہور برادری پچمیل سے تھا جس میں غالب اکثریت نو مسلم راجپوتوں کی ہے۔[[1]] اصلاحی کا خاندان درمیانے درجے کا زمینددار تھا۔ امین احسن کے والد مرتضیٰ ولد وزیرعلی ایک دین دار نیک سیرت اور معزز آدمی تھے۔ اصلاحی کا آبائی گاؤں بمہور(اعظم گڑھ(یو۔پی) سے چار میل کے فاصلے پر دریائے ٹونس کے کنارے پر واقع تھا۔[[2]]

ولادت

امین احسن کی درست تاریخ پیدائش محفوظ نہیں کیونکہ اس وقت تاریخ پیدائش کے اندراج کی طرف توجہ نہیں ہوتی تھی البتہ اصلاحی کی پیدائش کا سال ۱۹۰۴ء ہے۔[[3]]

ابتدائی تعلیم

اصلاحی نے ابتدائی تعلیم گاؤں کے مکتب سے حاصل کی سرکاری مکتب میں ان کےاستاد بشیر احمد جبکہ دینی مکتب میں فصیح احمد کے شاگرد بنے ۔یہاں سے انہوں نے قرآن مجید اور فارسی کی تعلیم حاصل کی۔

اعلیٰ تعلیم

شبلی نعمانی جب علی گڑھ، دیوبند اور ندوۃ العلماء لکھنو سے ان مقاصد کے حصول کےلیے مایوس ہوئے جو اسلام کی نشاۃ ثانیہ کےلیے ان کے پیش نظر تھے تو پھرایک طرف انہوں نے دارالمصنفین اعظم گڑھ پر توجہ دی تو دوسری طرف مدرستہ الاصلاح سرائے میر کو مرکز تعلیم بنانے کی جدوجہد کی تاکہ ان مقاصد کو حاصل کیا جاسکے جو دینی اور دنیاوی تناظر سے قابل قبول ہوں۔

۱۹۱۴ء کے اوئل میں جب شبلی نعمانی ہر طرف سے کٹ کر اعظم گڑھ میں معتکف ہوگئے تو انہوں نے مدرسہ کی بہتری کی طرف توجہ کی ایک طرف تو انہوں نے حمیدالدین فراہی کو مدرسہ کی سرپرستی کی دعوت دی تو دوسری طرف اپنے ایک لائق شاگرد شبلی متکلم ندوی کو مدرسہ کا مہتمم مقرر کیا۔[

Mīthāq Al-Madīnah: A Universal Charter of Peace an Analytical Study in the Modern Socio-Political Context

Different religious, political and social leaders tried their best to establish peace and prosperity in the society in different phases of the human history. An influential effort out of these efforts is that of the Prophet (r) Muḥammad. The Prophet (r) faced a pluralistic society of different faiths and religions in Madīnah. So, to make a better relationship and establish peace between the Muslims and the other communities of Madīnah, an agreement, which is called Mīthāq al-Madīnah, was made. Mīthāq al-Madīnah was not only a deed, but it presents all those principles and regulations, which were mandatory for peace building in a state or society. The excellent aspect of this charter is that the recipients of this charter were not the Muslims only, but a pluralistic society of different faiths. These communities were bound to establish peace with an agreement. This charter is an excellent model of peace, prosperity, freedom and human rights. According to this charter, all the parties were free with their religious beliefs and social interests. It was also the constitution of Madīnah. The renowned Muslim scholars are unanimously agreed that it was the first written constitution of the world. This agreement provides all other communities of Madīnah (the Jews, the Christians, and the polytheists) equal rights and freedom. Consequently, the charter of Madīnah can become a base for enduring peace and peaceful coexistence in a pluralistic world for the sake of the welfare of the human beings.

Toxicological Studies of Recent Conventional Insecticides and Fungicide Groups in Comparison With Azadirachta Indica Neem Leaf Extract Against Adult Earthworm, Pheretima Posthuma With Reference to Effect on Proteins & Enzymes

The current study, illustrate the toxicity of five pesticides i.e. sulfoxaflor, nitenpyram, spinetoram, azoxystrobin and neem leaf extract against imago (Pheretima posthuma Kinberg) earthworm in respect of its impact on total protein, protein mobility by electrophoresis and activity of cholinesterase. By applying the contact cum feeding method the earthworms were exposed to the test materials. Three major parts of LD50 exposed alive and active earthworms have been subjected to the estimation of total protein amounts, the activity of cholinesterase and for protein mobility through native gel electrophoresis. The average percent mortality was found to be 20%, 40%, 60%, 70% and 90% and 20%, 30%, 40%, 60% and 80% of post treatments in respect of doses i.e. 0.06, 0.12, 0.24, 0.48, 0.96 ppm of soil, under the effect of sulfoxaflor and nitenpyram respectively. The average percent mortality was found to be 20%, 40%, 60%, 80%, 90% and 20%, 30%, 40%, 50%, 70% and 10%, 20%, 30%, 40% and 60% against the treatment doses of 0.50, 1.0, 2.0, 4.0 and 8.0 ppm in soil by the spinetoram, azoxistrobin and neem leaf extract respectively. The LD50 values of neem leaf extract were foundat 5.47 ppm as compared to the LD50 values of other four compounds under studies sulfoxaflor, nitenpyram, spinetoram, azoxystrobin were observed as 0.1841, 0.2908, 1.4288, 3.2107 ppm of soil respectively. It was observed that in the peristomium region amongst all the treatments the preponderance amount of protein was found as 56.5>38.86>35.23>30.6>28.6 mg/ml at post treatment of neem extract, nitenpyram, sulfoxaflor, spinetoram and azoxystrobin respectively. In the clitellum region amongst all the treatments the preponderance amount of protein was found at 66.8>42.0>48.1>43.2>34.0 mg/ml at post treatment of neem leaf extract, sulfoxaflor, nitenpyram, azoxystrobin and spinetoram respectively, while in the abdomen region the total amount of protein was found as 58.0>44.5>39.0>36.0>35.0 mg/ml at post treatment of neem leaf extract, spinetoram, nitenpyram, azoxystrobin and sulfoxaflor respectively. Comparatively, in the control batch the total amount of protein was found in the peristomium region as 66.1-78.2 mg/ml, clitellum region as 72.0-85.0 mg/ml and abdomen region as 60.0- 78.0 mg/ml. In the peristomium region amongst all the treatments, the cholinesterase inhibition was found at 30sec as 86%>86.00%>85.38%>81.33%>76.68% at post treatments of azoxystrobin, nitenpyram, sulfoxaflor, spinetoram, and neem extract respectively, the cholinesterase inhibition was found at 60 sec as 89.55%>88.10%> 87.22%>86.52%>72.39% at post treatments of nitenpyram, azoxystrobin, spinetoram, sulfoxaflor and neem extract respectively, the cholinesterase inhibition was found at 90sec as 95.11%>87.60%>87.39%>84.42%>79.01% at post treatments of spinetoram, nitenpyram, azoxystrobin, neem extract and sulfoxaflor respectively. In the clitellum region amongst all the treatments, the cholinesterase inhibition was found at 30sec as 57.11%>51.62%>27.09%>25.46% at post treatments of nitenpyram, spinetoram, sulfoxaflor and azoxystrobin respectively, the cholinesterase inhibition was found at 60sec as 52.00%>28.81%>19.42%>09.33% at post treatments of sulfoxaflor, spinetoram, nitenpyram and azoxystrobin respectively, the cholinesterase inhibition was found at 90sec as 68.84%>33.58%>23.44%>22.90% at post treatments of nitenpyram, sulfoxaflor, azoxystrobin and spinetoram respectively. While, in the case of treatment with neem leaf extract, a cholinesterase enhancement case was found in the clittelum region at 15.09%, 09.04% and 30.23% at the intervals of 30sec, 60 Sec and 90 Sec respectively. In the abdomen region amongst all the treatments, the cholinesterase inhibition was found at 30sec as 90.00%>81.58%>64.89%>64.89%>51.50% at post treatments of nitenpyram, sulfoxaflor, spinetoram, azoxystrobin and neem leaf extract respectively, the cholinesterase inhibition was found at 60 sec as 74.29%>73.96%>73.96%>60.59%>52.77% post treatments of spinetoram, nitenpyram, sulfoxaflor, azoxystrobin and neem leaf extract respectively, the cholinesterase inhibition was found at 90sec as 77.76%>68.84%>50.72%>34.61% >33.58% at post treatment of spinetoram, nitenpyram, azoxystrobin, neem leaf extract and sulfoxaflor respectively. In the present work, the impacts of sulfoxaflor, nitenpyram, spinetoram, azoxystrobin and Azadirachta indica (Neem) on exposure to earthworm Pheretima Posthuma Kinbergin peristomium, clitellum and abdomen regions have been determined by employing 6% native gel electrophoresis. The estimated proteins as observed in the region of peristomium of earthworm designated as proteins–Rm–0.987 and Rm–0.025 were found only in neem treated, proteins–Rm–0.900, Rm–0.600 and Rm–0.125 were newly appeared in azoxystrobin treated, proteins–Rm–0.892 and Rm– 0.383 were present in sulfoxaflor treated, newly appeared proteins–Rm–0.851, Rm–0.679 and Rm–0.283 were present in nitenpyram treated, proteins–Rm–0.567, Rm–0.370 and Rm–0.271 were found in spinetoram treated only and proteins–Rm–0.650, Rm–0.450, Rm–0.312 and Rm–0.135 were observed in control samples. Some proteins were found in contrast treatments i.e. proteins–Rm–0.925 and Rm–0.135 were present in control and neem treated, protein- Rm–0.792 has been found in control and azoxystrobin treated and a distinctive protein–Rm–0.723 has been only found in sulfoxaflor and spinetoram treated worms. In the clitellum regions, appeared proteins–Rm–0.938, Rm–0.809, Rm–0.415 and Rm–0.158 were present in sulfoxaflor treated, proteins–Rm–0.937, Rm-0.737and Rm–0.150 have been found in spinetoram treated, proteins–Rm–0.925, Rm–0.792, Rm–0.450 and Rm–0.312 were found in control, proteins–Rm–0.920, Rm–0.400 and Rm–0.162 have been observed in nitenpyram treated, proteins–Rm–0.887, Rm–0.762, Rm–0.375, Rm–0.125 and Rm–0.025 have been observed in neem treated and Protein–Rm–0.250 was present in azoxystrobin treated samples only. While, few same proteins were found in contrast treatments i.e. protein–Rm–0.600 was merely found in sulfoxaflor and nitenpyram treated, protein–Rm–0.525 was observed in azoxystrobin and neem leaf extract treated samples and proteins– Rm–0.650 and Rm– 0.135 were observed in control and azoxystrobin treated. Whereas, in the abdomen regions freshly, emerged proteins–Rm–0.975, Rm– 0.875, Rm–0.737, Rm–0.387, Rm–0.387 and Rm–0.050 were present in neem treated samples, proteins–Rm–0.925, Rm–0.792, Rm–0.650, Rm–0.450, Rm–0.312 and Rm– 0.135 were found in control treated, proteins–Rm–0.827, Rm–0.617, Rm–0.419 and Rm–0.209 were found in nitenpyram treatement, proteins–Rm–0.756, Rm–0.609, Rm–0.390 and Rm–0.219 were merely found in spinetoram treated samples, unique proteins-Rm–0.750, Rm–0.612, Rm–0.412, Rm–0.325 and Rm–0.0625 were only found in azoxystrobin treated and proteins–Rm–0.861, Rm–0.646 and Rm–0.507 have been observed in sulfoxaflor treated samples, while, all above mentioned proteins absent in contrast treatments of sulfoxaflor, nitenpyram, spinetoram, azoxystrobin, neem treated and control samples.