مولانا محمد مبارک علی
مولانا محمد مبارک علی صاحب جن کی عمرچھیاسی برس کے قریب ہوگی حضرت شیخ الہند کے شاگردِ خاص اورآپ سے بیعت بھی تھے اورحضرت کی اسارتِ مالٹا کے بعد حضرت الاستاذ مولانا مفتی عزیز الرحمن صاحب ؒ سے تجدیدِ بیعت کرلی تھی اور حضرت مفتی صاحب کے خدام خاص میں شامل ہوکر حضرت موصوف ہی سے طریقہ نقشبندی میں اجازت بیعت و ارشاد حاصل کی۔ایک عرصہ تک ٹونک میں صدر مفتی رہے اورریشمی خطوط کی تحریک سے بھی تعلق خاص رہا۔ غالباً ۱۹۱۹ء میں مدراس (پرناہٹ) تشریف لے گئے تھے اورپھر بریلی کے قدیم مدرسہ مصباح العلوم میں صدارت درس کی خدمت انجام دی۔اب کم وبیش اڑتیس سال سے دارالعلوم دیوبند میں نائب مہتم کے عہدہ پرفائز تھے۔اہتمام و انتظام میں دسترس کے علاوہ کبھی کبھی حدیث کی کسی کتاب کادرس بھی دیتے تھے۔ تقویٰ وطہارت اوراخلاق وشمائل کے لحاظ سے سلف صالحین کانمونہ اورمثال تھے۔ صدحیف!دنیا اب ایسے حضرات سے خالی ہوتی جارہی ہے۔تغمد ھمااﷲ بمغفرتہ ورحمتہ ۔ [ستمبر۱۹۶۸ء]
The Mohkam and Mutashabeh is a renowned terminology of the Quranic Sciences and commentators of the Holy Quran described it in details, according to root words of Mohkam, it means Stopping and perfecting the things, this basic meaning can be seen in all the types and variations of this word. On the other hand we have the word Mutashabeh which root meaning is complication and unclearness. If we discuss both of the words as a terminology of the Quranic sciences, we can define Mohkam as “one which define itself without any other thing” or “one which has no need to be defined by something else” and Mutashabeh is “one which can’t define itself and need to be explained by someone else”. We will move on to discuss both terms in Holy Quran as a terminology to describe its multiple variations in the Holy Quran, its types and further we will discuss that why the Holy Quran contains both terms, in other words, we can say which are the logics and reasons of including Mutashabeh verses in the Holy Quran. In addition, we will mention the point of views of various renowned commentators and fields experts which give us a clear and sound concept about both of the terms.
RB1, CCND1 and CDK4 are major cell cycle check point players related to head and neck cancer (HNC). Polymorphisms in these genes have frequently been reported in literature and are known to follow diverse patterns in relation to different populations. The current study was designed to screen these genes in head and neck cancer patients and control samples at DNA, RNA and protein level. Blood and tissue samples of pathologically confirmed head and neck cases were collected from different hospitals. Polymerase chain reaction (PCR) and single-strand confirmation polymorphism (SSCP) were used for germline screening, followed by sequence analysis. In second step Real time-PCR was performed to study expression of these genes at mRNA level. Immunohistochemistry was performed to evaluate the protein expression of these molecules in cancer tissues as well as controls. Epigenetic analysis was performed using methylation specific PCR. In the last part of the study, in vitro studies were carried out to characterize cancer cells with selected RB1 mutations and their response to drug resistance (doxorubicin). In first part of this study, PCR-SSCP and DNA sequencing were used to analyze the coding regions of RB1, CCND1 and CDK4 in 730 individuals (380 head and neck patients and 350 controls). Sequence analysis of coding regions of RB1 gene results in 18 mutations (one silent, 10 missense, 3 frame shift, 2 nonsense mutations and 2 splice site substitutions). Among these mutations, one silent synonymous mutation was observed in exon 12 (g70282A>G), 5 missense mutations observed in exon 14 (g76474C>T, g76475G>C, g76476A>G, g76467G>C g76468T>C and 2 missesnse mutations in exon 16 (g77041A>T, g77043A>G). One frameshift mutations in exon 12, was a result of deletion of five nucleotide GATGA (g70285_70289delGATGA). 2 frameshift mutations were found in exon 21, one novel frameshift mutation was due to the insertion of nucleotide G (g160601_160602insG) while the other was due to insertion of nucleotide A [(g160623_160624insA) (CI952130)]. In exon 14 and exon 24, 2 nonsense mutations Lys462stop (novel) and Ser834stop (CM952105) were also observed, respectively. Germline analysis of CCND1 coding revealed total 4 mutations, one missense, one frameshift, one silent and one in 3''UTR. One novel missense (g3578C>A) and one novel xframeshift mutation (g3383delA) was observed in exon 3. One silent variation as substitution of G>A (G870A [rs9344]) was observed in exon 4. In addition C>A transition (rs7177) was observed in untranslated region (3''UTR) of CCND1. CDK4 germline mutation analysis showed 2 missense mutations (g5051G>C and g5095G>C) in exon 2 and 2 missense mutations in exon 5 (g5906C>A and g5907C>G). One novel frameshift mutation as a result of three nucleotide deletion (g7321_23delTGA) was observed in exon 7. Additionally 2 novel frameshift mutations as a result of insertion of nucleotide G (g7121_7122insG) and deletion of nucleotide G (g7143delG) were also observed in 3''UTR. mRNA expression of Rb pathway genes (RB1, CCND1 and CDK4) was studied in 72 head and neck tumors samples and adjacent un-involved tissues (control), using real-time PCR. A statistically significant (p<0.001) down-regulation of RB1 was observed in tumor samples compared to control samples. CCND1 (p<0.004) and CDK4 (p<0.02) showed over expression in tumor samples versus control samples. Immunohistochemical analysis of RB1, CCND1 and CDK4 suggested 67% tumors exhibited down-regulated expression of RB1, 62% of tumors showed up-regulated CCND1 expression and 54% of tumors showed up-regulated expression of CDK4. Epigenetic analysis was performed to check methylation status of RB1 promoter region, through methylation specific PCR (MSP). Methylation analysis of RB1 promoter region after sequence analysis revealed that 3% of CpG island was methylated in patients as compared to controls (un-involved tissues). In vitro characterization of selected RB1 mutations was carried out using cancer cell lines, revealed that RB1 mutations in important functional domains result in abnormally reduced protein stability causing defects in RB1 functioning which may play a role in tumor proliferation. Results indicate that loss of RB1 function makes the condition selectively advantageous in tumor aggression which highlights the importance of RB1 in tumor protection. Results from this study also suggest that cells expressing mutant RB1Arg455Ser-V5 and RB1Ile835Asn-V5 may get a survival advantage against doxorubicin induced cytotoxicity, which may enhance drug resistance.