حضرت پیر جلیل اخون
بخشش لئی ہے نیک شگون
پیر نیاز محمد نے جد ایتھے لائیاں تلیاں
دین نبیؐ دی شمع نال چا روشن کیتیاں گلیاں
ایڈی دین دی خدمت کیتی داد دتی سی ولیاں
دین دی خدمت کارن ہر کوئی آپ دا سی ممنون
ایڈے زاہد عالم کامل وچ زمانے فردا
قدراں دے نال جانے ہر کوئی گلہ نہ کوئی کردا
حافظ، قاری، عالم، کامل ہر کوئی پانی بھردا
باقی سب ستارے نیں تے آپ انہاندے ’’مون‘‘
بابا جی دے بیٹے سارے پیار بھرے نے بھائی
پیر جلیل نے ودھ انہاں توں بہتی شہرت پائی
ایڈے زاہد، کامل، اکمل، فقر دی جوت جگائی
آپ دی جے کر محفل بہئے ملدا بڑا سکون
شیخ کبیر اختر سائیں توں فیض روحانی پائے
ایڈا ادب تے خدمت کیتی بن مخدوم سی آئے
خالی کدی نہ پرتے جیہڑے خدمت دے وچ آئے
فائدہ ہر نوں ملدا جیویں فائدہ دیوے زمین وہون
ایڈا وڈا دین دا مرکز بچے پڑھن ہزاراں
فقہ ، حدیث ، قرآن، فقر دیاں لگیاں موج بہاراں
رم جھم رحمتاں برسن ایتھے ہووے شفا بیماراں
کامل پیر دے چرناں وچ ناں وڑدا شیطان ملعون
ظاہر باطن فیض انہاندا ہر ہر جائیں ملدا
جھنڈا لایا بدر عالم جو اجے وی ایتھے ہلدا
آپ دی جامع دا پڑھیا تے علم دریا تھیں ٹھلدا
لکھ ہنیریاں گھلن قائم رہے گا دین دا ایہہ ستون
دستار مبارک جبہ عاصا بوہت حضرت نوں سجدا
تکدا جیہڑا ہک واری اوہ ویکھ ویکھ ناں رجدا
شہرت ملدی نال نصیباں ، کرم ہے سوہنے رب دا
مفتی خلیق ہے آپ نوں جیویں موسیٰ نوں ہارون
The question of the status of Prophet Muhammad has been one of the most crucial and controversial issue of Muslims-Christian relations since the advent of Islam. In almost every Muslim-Christian encounter, the question of Christian acknowledgement of prophet-hood of Muhammad has been raised. Muslim ask, when we accept and regard Jesus as a prophet, why you (Christian) do not recipro-cate by giving the same status to prophet Muhammad. The present study is an attempt to analyze the points which Kenneth Cragg has raised, In response of the Muslims, who say, why the Christian don’t give such respect to Muhammad(SAW) as the Muslim give to Jesus. In this study I proved that Cragg’s answer is not only against the Holy Quran but also against The teachings of Gospel and the only reason for this disregard Is prejudicial and polemical.
Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) are ubiquitous environmental hazards in Pakistan. There are many ways in which the PAH can enter the soil environment and interfere with the soil system and the plants grown in soil. This study demonstrates the efficacy of organic amendments to improve phytoremediation efficiency in PAH contaminated soil. The main objectives of the study were to compare PAH concentration in soil before and after the pot experiments in different treatments and demonstrate the interaction of soil PAHs and compost amendments on PAH bioavailability in soil. To assess plant growth in PAH contaminated soil and their subsequent uptake of PAH by vetiver grass and rye grass and to evaluate the effect of season on the PAH sequestration in SOM fractions. Experiments were conducted with two different soils (S1: Gujar Khan with silty clay loam texture and S2: PMAS-Arid agriculture university Rawalpindi main campus with sandy loam texture) and grass (P1: vetiver; P2: rye grass) types. Each type of soil and grass was studied in six different levels of diesel contamination and compost amendment (T1: Control; T2: 1% compost; T3: 0.5% diesel (PAHs); T4: 1% diesel (PAHs); T5: 0.5% diesel (PAHs) + 1% compost and T6: 1% diesel (PAHs) + 1% compost) and performed with three replications. Pot trials were conducted in two seasons: during June – September (2012), and October – January (2013). Soil physic-chemical analysis and soil organic matter fractionation was performed at the start of experiments and also at the end of pot experiments. Soil PAHs analysis was done after the 15 days of spiking and at the end of experiments. PAHs were analyzed by GC-MS. Physicochemical analysis of the soil pH and EC values were lower than the initial values. 21 Similarly organic matter, TOC and TN concentrations varied significantly in each treatment. Plant growth revealed that PAH contamination negatively influenced both grass species. However adding compost improved the plant growth in PAHcontaminated soils with 1% compost. In treatments with diesel and compost amendments the plant biomass was higher in summer compared to winter. A 56% decrease in root length was observed in vetiver grass when soil was spiked with 1% diesel. Uptake of low molecular weight PAHs was higher compared to high molecular weight PAHs. Accumulation of PAHs in root and shoot corresponded to the removal of PAHs from soil by grasses. The accumulation of PAHs in plant biomass was greater in summer than winter. The effect of various treatments applied showed that the more PAHs accumulated in the absence of compost. Whereas the sequestration by SOM in T5 and T6 reduced the concentration of PAHs in soil. In vetiver most of PAHs are accumulated in roots compared to shoots. GC-MS analysis for soil PAHs indicated that PAH concentration declined from the initial concentration. Microbial community analysis by TRFLP showed that Streptomyces and Mycobacterium were the dominating species in diesel contaminated soil. Soil fractionation showed that the humin fraction had higher percentage in both types of soils, while Fulvic acid concentration was lowest in all treatments. However, fulvic acid content was positively correlated to the PAHs in soil. In the case of high molecular weight PAHs, humic acid was positively correlated with the sequestration matrix. This study clearly showed that the phytoremediation of contaminated soil using organic amendments and plants with a dense root system could be a useful approach for removal of PAHs from contaminated soil. Compost amendment has increased the degradation of PAHs through facilitated by microbial activity. Soil organic matter fractions were the prime sites where PAHs was mostly sequestered.