وہ۔۔۔!
میں خانقاہ کا دروازہ کھولتا
وہ میرے پیچھے پیچھے مست چراغ کی الست روشنی میں!
باغ عدن میں لکھی۔۔۔!
نثری نظموں کی ظہر اور عصر کی کتاب سینے سے لگائے چلی آتی
ارضی زخموں کو
تاثیر مغرب اور آب عشاء سے دھوتی
اپنی گود میں۔۔۔میرا سر رکھتے ہوئے!
مر مری بانہوں میں لیے۔۔۔حواؑ کی طرح لپٹ جاتی
لوبان و صندل سلگاتے ہوئے!
آفاقی چاندنی میں زخموں پر ماہتابی مرہم لگاتی
تہجد شناس نظروں سے دیکھتی۔۔۔!
کنواری کرنوں جیسے ہونٹوں سے چومتے ہوئے!
اسمائے عشق کا سینے پر دم کرتی
پھر محبت پہ درود۔۔۔چاہت پہ سلام پڑھتے ہوئے
فجر کے حوالے کرتے ہوئے۔۔۔نہ جانے کیوں چلی جاتی ؟
بس لمس کی حدت۔۔۔!
بوسوں کی لذت چھوڑ جاتی ہے
The frequently fluctuating price of palm oil causes palm oil farmers in Tanjung Kudu, Kualu Village, to take action to overcome their family's economic problems as a result of prices fluctuating drastically. The aim of this research is to determine the behavior of oil palm farmers in facing price fluctuations and to determine the Islamic economics review of the behavior of oil palm farmers in facing price fluctuations in Tanjung Kudu, Kualu Village. This research is field research located in Tanjung Kudu, Kualu Village. The informants in this research were 10 oil palm farmers with the criteria being farmers who had a plantation area of more than 2 hectares and had worked for a minimum of 5 years. Data collection techniques through observation, interviews and documentation. Data analysis is descriptive qualitative. It was found that oil palm farmers carry out various kinds of behavior to increase family income, such as working side jobs, becoming farm laborers, construction workers, traders, and others. Some of the oil palm farmers' wives also help in increasing the family's income by opening small businesses such as opening a breakfast business, a daily shop business, and a laundry business. The behavior of oil palm farmers in facing price fluctuations applies the principle of honesty, always trying to earn a living, not being discouraged, never giving up, being responsible for family needs, and not being lazy in working.
In the Global War on Terrorism (GWOT), the post-9/11 Pakistan’s alliance with the US has become an important subject of discussion and analysis in and outside the country. This study makes an attempt to examine and analyse comprehensively the costbenefit calculus for Pakistan as a result of its role in the US-led GWOT. Its basic premise is the hypothesis that Pakistan incurred more costs than benefits it accrued in this relationship. This is verified by using the exploratory research with qualitative method through inductive logic which is based on empirical data analysed through descriptive analysis. The paradigm of realism is used to explain these relations in their cost-benefit context. It also reviews the historical background of the US-Pakistan relations to contextualize and understand the nature of their bilateral cooperation during this period. It is noteworthy that from 1947 to 2001, these relations enjoyed two phases of close cooperation i.e. from1954 to 1962 and from 1979 to 1990 during which Pakistan derived great benefits but also paid huge costs for its cooperation with the US. These relations had reached their lowest level till 9/11 due to the US-imposed three-tier nuclear as well as democracy-related sanctions on Pakistan during 1990s. However, the events of 9/11 once again changed the dimensions of their relations particularly in the wake of the US decision to start GWOT from Afghanistan forcing the government of General Pervez Musharraf in Pakistan to cooperate in this war. During this war, Pakistan made tremendous efforts and huge sacrifices due to which it considerably won the appreciation from the US-led Western alliance. However, the US continued making demand from Pakistan to ‘do more’ to eliminate the terrorists sheltered in safe havens and sanctuaries in Pakistan, as blamed by the US, Afghan government and India, which the latter always denied. This tension continued haunting Pakistan-US relations during this period with periodical vicissitudes. But, the operative dynamics of the anti-terrorism cooperation kept these relations working in which, as premised, Pakistan suffered more losses than the benefits it accrued.