شفیق جونپوری
جناب شفیق جونپوری اُردو زبان کے نامور شاعر تھے اوراُن کاتعلق شعراء کے اُس گروہ سے تھا جوترقی پسند شاعری کے اُس دور طمطراق میں بھی فکروبیان کی پرانی قدروں کوسینہ سے لگاتے رہے، اورصرف یہی نہیں بلکہ اپنے فنی کمال و صنعت گری کے ذریعہ اُن کو مزید جلا بخشی اوران کی عزّت وآبرو قائم رکھی۔ کوئی شبہ نہیں کہ ان حضرات کی وفات ملک و قوم اورعلم وادب کے لیے بڑا حادثہ ہے،لیکن یہ دنیا یوں ہی چل رہی ہے اور چلتی رہے گی ۔ سدارہے نام اﷲ کا!
[جون ۱۹۶۳ء]
Penelitian ini didasari oleh suatu kondisi yaitu belum maksimalnya penyerapan anggaran pada Dinas Perumahan Rakyat dan Kawasan Permukiman Kabupaten Nias Utara. Oleh karena itu masalah ini harus segera diatasi, salah satunya melalui penelitian untuk menemukan faktor-faktor yang mempengaruhi penyerapan anggaran ini bisa maksimal. Penelitian ini merupakan penelitian kualitatif untuk meneliti faktor-faktor yang mempengaruhi penyerapan anggaran pada Dinas Perumahan Rakyat dan Kawasan Permukiman Kabupaten Nias Utara. Fokus penelitian ini adalah menjelaskan faktor-faktor yang mempengaruhi penyerapan anggaran yaitu faktor perencanaan, faktor administrasi, faktor sumber daya manusia, faktor pengadaan barang/jasa, faktor regulasi dan faktor komitmen organisasi. Sampel seluruh pegawai pada Dinas Perumahan Rakyat dan Kawasan Permukiman Kabupaten Nias Utara dengan jumlah sampel sebanyak 17 orang. Metode penelitian yang digunakan yaitu riset deskriptif kualitatif yaitu riset didasarkan pada data kualitatif dalam pernyataan-pernyataan. Hasil penelitian merekomendasikan untuk lebih cepat dalam pengesahan anggaran oleh DPRD dan Pemerintah Daerah sehingga memiliki waktu untuk penyerapannya, melibatkan masing-masing SKPD dalam merencanakan anggaran sehingga tidak terdapat kegiatan penting yang terlewatkan dan perlu perhatian dari segi sarana dan prasana yang kurang memadai karena akan mempengaruhi kinerja pegawai.
This doctoral dissertation comprises a qualitative work based empirical case study that is interpreted through and embedded in the academic discipline of sociology of organizations, and in it the institutional theory. I use the vast and rich literature from that theory to study an event quite unprecedented in the modern history of the Global South. The event being about how the judiciary in Pakistan shook off its historical subservience to the executive, confronted a military dictator (General Musharraf), and successfully mobilized a social movement (2007‐2009) for its own independence, and won with the dictator imprisoned and a democratic rule restored in the country. Interviews (average interview length being 2.2 hours) were conducted with about 80 key national actors coming from the military, judicial, legal, media, and civil society sectors of Pakistan together with assuming extensive coverage of secondary data to investigate the following unexplored questions in institutional theory: 1) What are the forms of institutional work involved in decoupling an institutional logic (e.g., the logic of independence of judiciary) whereby the symbolism and material practices of the logic no more remain aligned or consistent with one another?; and 2) What is the process through which decoupled institutional logics becomes successfully recoupled? A rigorous analysis of the primary and secondary data reveals the presence of distinct institutional work forms and associated activities for decoupling and recoupling of institutional logics. For instance, the various forms of institutional work through which decoupling of judicial independence logic was achieved in Pakistan included use of force and violence, misuse of formal authority, emotional exploitation, managing crime partnerships, and identity work ‐ each manifested through different activities. Likewise, institutional work forms involved in recoupling process of judicial independence logic, which came to eventually involve a full blown social movement in Pakistan, have also been delineated in my doctoral work.Moreover, an entire process is delineated that shows how a decoupled institutional logic becomes recoupled. All of these discoveries (i.e., the institutional work forms involved in decoupling an institutional logic and the recoupling process of a decoupled institutional logic) are claimed as the main contributions of this thesis. This is because they extend the existing conversations on institutional theory, particularly in its hitherto overlooked and hence under‐theorized area of institutional work forms relating to coupling dynamics in institutional logics. In doing so, this doctoral dissertation also sheds light on the relatively under‐researched areas of institutional coupling, how couplings reverse from tight‐to‐loose, or vice‐versa, and by extension how macro‐institutional environments and local activities are linked together (Binder 2007; Hallet, 2010).