اسلام اور یہودیت کا قانون حلال و حرام: مشترکات اور مختلفات کا جا ئزہ

The world Semitic religions like Judaism, Christianity and Islam have given comprehensive regulations and code of life. Therefore; there has been a complete system and directions about “ḥalal” and “ḥaram” (kosher non-kosher) means legal and illegal (treif’ in Jewish law). As Islam gives clear cut directives in beliefs, worships, ethics, economy and ways of life to guide the men in life; similarly the Judaism has also given clear regulations in these fields to guide its followers. Islam has taught its followers to eat and drink ‘ḥalal’ (Tayyib), so Judaism has also stressed on eating only ‘kosher’ (food that can be consumed according to Jewish law). For example in animals; meat of cow, bull, sheep and goat etc are legitimizing for eating in both the religions. Similarly the meat of pig is not allowed for men. Many things are similar in both these religions regarding dietary law. This article describes about ‘ḥalal’ and ‘kosher’ things in detail and tells what the similarities and dissimilarities regarding dietary laws are found in their religious literatures.

Detection of Asymptomatic Patients of Malaria in Kohat District of Pakistan

Background Kohat district is one of the low to medium intensity malaria transmission areas in Pakistan where asymptomatic carriers are likely to form a reservoir of infection. This study was done to explore the possibility of using microscopy, rapid device testing (RDT), low-cost in house real time polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) and End point fluorometry (EPF) for detection of malaria in the asymptomatic immediate family members of patients of malaria (homestead) and in a sample from the general population of Kohat. Objectives 1. To evaluate the feasibility of screening of malaria by polymerase chain reaction (PCR) targeting the 18S Small Subunit ribosomal RNA gene (SSUrRNA gene) in the diagnosed patients of malaria. 2. To evaluate the usefulness of PCR for SSUrRNA gene of malaria parasite in detection of suspected asymptomatic carriers of malaria. Materials and Methods This cross-sectional study was carried out at Combined Military Hospital Kohat and Molecular Lab of Riphah International University, Islamabad from Jan - Dec 2015. A total of 1000 individuals including 200 microscopy positive patients of malaria, 400 asymptomatic immediate family members (homestead) of the symptomatic patients of malaria and 400 apparently healthy controls were tested by microscopy, RDT and RT-PCR and RT- PCR followed by EPF. Results In the 200 microscopy positive patients of malaria 190 (95%) were positive by RDT and all were positive by RT-PCR. In the 400 individuals from the homestead of patients of malaria six (1.5%) individuals showed malarial parasite on microscopy, RDT failed to pick any individual with malaria and 32 (8%) were positive for malaria on RT-PCR. On fluorometry all of the RT-PCR positive results were positive and the negative results were negative. The difference in the frequency of malaria in the homestead versus general population was very significant (p = 0.0002) and the relative risk of malaria was 4.0 times higher (95% CI: 1.87 to 8.57). Conclusion The chances of detecting asymptomatic carriers of malaria is significantly higher in the homestead of malaria patients than in the general population and for this purpose low cost RT-PCR with End Point Fluorometry can be very useful in the diagnosis of malaria especially with low parasitemia.