Search or add a thesis

Advanced Search (Beta)
Home > Satisfaction Among Physical Therapy Educators About Current Physical Therapy

Satisfaction Among Physical Therapy Educators About Current Physical Therapy

Thesis Info

Author

Ibad Ullah

Supervisor

Asghar Khan

Program

MS

Institute

Riphah International University

Institute Type

Private

City

Islamabad

Country

Pakistan

Thesis Completing Year

2014

Thesis Completion Status

Completed

Page

58 . : ill. ; 29 cm. +CD

Subject

Medicine & Health

Language

English

Other

Submitted in fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Post Professional Doctor of Physical Therapy;; Thesis (MS) Riphah International University, 2014; English; Call No: 615.82370 IBA

Added

2021-02-17 19:49:13

Modified

2023-01-06 19:20:37

ARI ID

1676711753276

Similar


Loading...
Loading...

Similar Books

Loading...

Similar Chapters

Loading...

Similar News

Loading...

Similar Articles

Loading...

Similar Article Headings

Loading...

Foreword Two

Foreword Two

Brother Dr. Badr Hashemi has devoted care and attention to the tone and approach of the Translation and Paraphrasing of The Qur’an which is non-sectarian, true to the spiritual intent of Allah-consciousness, sincere toward leading to piety and righteousness.

The style of presenting the Translation, which proceeds smoothly in strict conformity with the Sacred Arabic Text and Paraphrasing (in italics) is persuasive that is inviting both for Muslim readers and others.

This is the most profound scholarly work of Brother Badr Hashemi. His monumental translation and annotation serve as a matchless aid to understanding the Holy Book of Islam and provides in itself a complete education in the faith. If one is new to the Holy Qur’an, I hope this book will provide a balanced view of the heart of the Qur‘an. If one is already a student of the Holy Qur’an, I hope this will perhaps awaken a new appreciation for the universal spiritual wisdom of the Book.

Reading a good translation such as this one can help us not only gain wisdom but also articulate this wisdom for others. I trust it would equally help in refining and fine tuning what everyone knows about the Qur’an, Islam, and Muslims.

May Allah accept this service to His Book, and enable his readers - especially students in colleges and universities - to make the best use of this valuable contribution to the Study of
The Qur’an.

Prof. Dr. Hafiz Abdur Raheem.
Dean
Faculty of Islamic Studies and Languages, Bahauddin Zakaria University, Multan, Pakistan.

بین الریاستی تعلقات میں اسلام کا تصورِصلح

Foreign policy is one of the wheels with which process of international politics operates. It is not separate from the national policy. It is an important tool to relate the relations to other countries. Foreign policies consist of aims and measures that are intended to guide government decisions and actions with regard to external affairs, particularly relations with foreign countries. Friendly, non-threatening and peace-loving attitude seems to be the hallmarks of most states. Yet on the other hand, there could be some countries that act as hostile and aggressive and there is hardly any world force that can constrain them. A basic and age-old problem of state systems arises from here:  national security. Many states deploy armed forces to deal this particular problem. Usually, states coexist and deal with each other without breaking the internal hegemony. So the main issues of mankind are war and peace. A great emphasis has been put in Islam in the field of international relations. Islam developed a different structure and gave a distinct understanding of international relations. Islam offers a complete handbook on international relations through his teachings. Peace works as root in the relation of countries. Securing the world peace and settling disputes and anarchy are the core aims of Islamic teaching.

Toxicological Studies of Recent Conventional Insecticides and Fungicide Groups in Comparison With Azadirachta Indica Neem Leaf Extract Against Adult Earthworm, Pheretima Posthuma With Reference to Effect on Proteins & Enzymes

The current study, illustrate the toxicity of five pesticides i.e. sulfoxaflor, nitenpyram, spinetoram, azoxystrobin and neem leaf extract against imago (Pheretima posthuma Kinberg) earthworm in respect of its impact on total protein, protein mobility by electrophoresis and activity of cholinesterase. By applying the contact cum feeding method the earthworms were exposed to the test materials. Three major parts of LD50 exposed alive and active earthworms have been subjected to the estimation of total protein amounts, the activity of cholinesterase and for protein mobility through native gel electrophoresis. The average percent mortality was found to be 20%, 40%, 60%, 70% and 90% and 20%, 30%, 40%, 60% and 80% of post treatments in respect of doses i.e. 0.06, 0.12, 0.24, 0.48, 0.96 ppm of soil, under the effect of sulfoxaflor and nitenpyram respectively. The average percent mortality was found to be 20%, 40%, 60%, 80%, 90% and 20%, 30%, 40%, 50%, 70% and 10%, 20%, 30%, 40% and 60% against the treatment doses of 0.50, 1.0, 2.0, 4.0 and 8.0 ppm in soil by the spinetoram, azoxistrobin and neem leaf extract respectively. The LD50 values of neem leaf extract were foundat 5.47 ppm as compared to the LD50 values of other four compounds under studies sulfoxaflor, nitenpyram, spinetoram, azoxystrobin were observed as 0.1841, 0.2908, 1.4288, 3.2107 ppm of soil respectively. It was observed that in the peristomium region amongst all the treatments the preponderance amount of protein was found as 56.5>38.86>35.23>30.6>28.6 mg/ml at post treatment of neem extract, nitenpyram, sulfoxaflor, spinetoram and azoxystrobin respectively. In the clitellum region amongst all the treatments the preponderance amount of protein was found at 66.8>42.0>48.1>43.2>34.0 mg/ml at post treatment of neem leaf extract, sulfoxaflor, nitenpyram, azoxystrobin and spinetoram respectively, while in the abdomen region the total amount of protein was found as 58.0>44.5>39.0>36.0>35.0 mg/ml at post treatment of neem leaf extract, spinetoram, nitenpyram, azoxystrobin and sulfoxaflor respectively. Comparatively, in the control batch the total amount of protein was found in the peristomium region as 66.1-78.2 mg/ml, clitellum region as 72.0-85.0 mg/ml and abdomen region as 60.0- 78.0 mg/ml. In the peristomium region amongst all the treatments, the cholinesterase inhibition was found at 30sec as 86%>86.00%>85.38%>81.33%>76.68% at post treatments of azoxystrobin, nitenpyram, sulfoxaflor, spinetoram, and neem extract respectively, the cholinesterase inhibition was found at 60 sec as 89.55%>88.10%> 87.22%>86.52%>72.39% at post treatments of nitenpyram, azoxystrobin, spinetoram, sulfoxaflor and neem extract respectively, the cholinesterase inhibition was found at 90sec as 95.11%>87.60%>87.39%>84.42%>79.01% at post treatments of spinetoram, nitenpyram, azoxystrobin, neem extract and sulfoxaflor respectively. In the clitellum region amongst all the treatments, the cholinesterase inhibition was found at 30sec as 57.11%>51.62%>27.09%>25.46% at post treatments of nitenpyram, spinetoram, sulfoxaflor and azoxystrobin respectively, the cholinesterase inhibition was found at 60sec as 52.00%>28.81%>19.42%>09.33% at post treatments of sulfoxaflor, spinetoram, nitenpyram and azoxystrobin respectively, the cholinesterase inhibition was found at 90sec as 68.84%>33.58%>23.44%>22.90% at post treatments of nitenpyram, sulfoxaflor, azoxystrobin and spinetoram respectively. While, in the case of treatment with neem leaf extract, a cholinesterase enhancement case was found in the clittelum region at 15.09%, 09.04% and 30.23% at the intervals of 30sec, 60 Sec and 90 Sec respectively. In the abdomen region amongst all the treatments, the cholinesterase inhibition was found at 30sec as 90.00%>81.58%>64.89%>64.89%>51.50% at post treatments of nitenpyram, sulfoxaflor, spinetoram, azoxystrobin and neem leaf extract respectively, the cholinesterase inhibition was found at 60 sec as 74.29%>73.96%>73.96%>60.59%>52.77% post treatments of spinetoram, nitenpyram, sulfoxaflor, azoxystrobin and neem leaf extract respectively, the cholinesterase inhibition was found at 90sec as 77.76%>68.84%>50.72%>34.61% >33.58% at post treatment of spinetoram, nitenpyram, azoxystrobin, neem leaf extract and sulfoxaflor respectively. In the present work, the impacts of sulfoxaflor, nitenpyram, spinetoram, azoxystrobin and Azadirachta indica (Neem) on exposure to earthworm Pheretima Posthuma Kinbergin peristomium, clitellum and abdomen regions have been determined by employing 6% native gel electrophoresis. The estimated proteins as observed in the region of peristomium of earthworm designated as proteins–Rm–0.987 and Rm–0.025 were found only in neem treated, proteins–Rm–0.900, Rm–0.600 and Rm–0.125 were newly appeared in azoxystrobin treated, proteins–Rm–0.892 and Rm– 0.383 were present in sulfoxaflor treated, newly appeared proteins–Rm–0.851, Rm–0.679 and Rm–0.283 were present in nitenpyram treated, proteins–Rm–0.567, Rm–0.370 and Rm–0.271 were found in spinetoram treated only and proteins–Rm–0.650, Rm–0.450, Rm–0.312 and Rm–0.135 were observed in control samples. Some proteins were found in contrast treatments i.e. proteins–Rm–0.925 and Rm–0.135 were present in control and neem treated, protein- Rm–0.792 has been found in control and azoxystrobin treated and a distinctive protein–Rm–0.723 has been only found in sulfoxaflor and spinetoram treated worms. In the clitellum regions, appeared proteins–Rm–0.938, Rm–0.809, Rm–0.415 and Rm–0.158 were present in sulfoxaflor treated, proteins–Rm–0.937, Rm-0.737and Rm–0.150 have been found in spinetoram treated, proteins–Rm–0.925, Rm–0.792, Rm–0.450 and Rm–0.312 were found in control, proteins–Rm–0.920, Rm–0.400 and Rm–0.162 have been observed in nitenpyram treated, proteins–Rm–0.887, Rm–0.762, Rm–0.375, Rm–0.125 and Rm–0.025 have been observed in neem treated and Protein–Rm–0.250 was present in azoxystrobin treated samples only. While, few same proteins were found in contrast treatments i.e. protein–Rm–0.600 was merely found in sulfoxaflor and nitenpyram treated, protein–Rm–0.525 was observed in azoxystrobin and neem leaf extract treated samples and proteins– Rm–0.650 and Rm– 0.135 were observed in control and azoxystrobin treated. Whereas, in the abdomen regions freshly, emerged proteins–Rm–0.975, Rm– 0.875, Rm–0.737, Rm–0.387, Rm–0.387 and Rm–0.050 were present in neem treated samples, proteins–Rm–0.925, Rm–0.792, Rm–0.650, Rm–0.450, Rm–0.312 and Rm– 0.135 were found in control treated, proteins–Rm–0.827, Rm–0.617, Rm–0.419 and Rm–0.209 were found in nitenpyram treatement, proteins–Rm–0.756, Rm–0.609, Rm–0.390 and Rm–0.219 were merely found in spinetoram treated samples, unique proteins-Rm–0.750, Rm–0.612, Rm–0.412, Rm–0.325 and Rm–0.0625 were only found in azoxystrobin treated and proteins–Rm–0.861, Rm–0.646 and Rm–0.507 have been observed in sulfoxaflor treated samples, while, all above mentioned proteins absent in contrast treatments of sulfoxaflor, nitenpyram, spinetoram, azoxystrobin, neem treated and control samples.