اسلام دین کائنات یعنی ازل سے سے اب تک تمام انسانوں کے لئے اللہ تعالی کابنایا ہوا دین ہے اسلام کا مطلب ہے اللہ کی رضا کے سامنے نے سر تسلیم خم کر دینا جو مرد یا عورت رات کو اللہ تعالی کے احکامات کے تابع کر لیتے ہیں وہی مسلمان کہلاتے ہیں ہیں اسلام کوئی نیا دین نہیں ہیں بلکہ روز اول سے موجود ہے جب انسان نے دنیا یا خدا کی زمین پر پہلا قدم رکھا تھا تھا۔
"اللہ تعالی نے جنوں اور انسانوں کو صرف اپنی عبادت کے لیے پیدا فرمایا ہے عربی لفظ عبادہ "عبد" سے نکلا ہے جس کا مطلب ہے اللہ کے احکام کی بجا آوری۔ بہت سے لوگوں میں یہ غلط فہمی پائی جاتی ہے کہ عبادت سے مراد صرف نماز پڑھنا ہے مگر یہ تاثر درست نہیں عبادت کا اعلی ترین عمل ضرور ہے مگر عبادت صرف نماز ہی نہیں بلکہ اعمال کا مجموعہ ہے اللہ تعالی کے تمام احکام کی بجا آوری عبادت ہے اللہ تعالی نے جن چیزوں سے منع فرمایا ہے ان سے اپنے آپ کو روکنا بھی عبادت ہے ہر وہ کام جس کا اللہ نے کرنے کا حکم دیا ہے اس کی ادائیگی بھی عبادت ہے ۔ اسلام جسم اورروح دونوں کی ضروریات کا اہتمام کرتا ہے اس کا کوئی حکم ایسا نہیں ہے جو انسانیت کے خلاف ہو گو بعض لوگ اسلام سے متعلق مکمل معلومات نہ ہونے کے سبب تشکیک کا شکار ہو سکتے ہیں کہ ایسا نہیں ہیں اور یہ کہ اسلام کا حکم درست نہیں ہے اسلام کے تمام احکامات سے متعلق حقائق سامنے لائے جائیں تو یہ بات ثابت ہوجائے گی کہ اسلام کا کوئی ایک حکم بھی انسانیت کے خلاف نہیں ہے اور یہ کہ کہ اسلام کا ہر حکم جسم یا پھر روح کے...
It is generally perceived in contemporary intellectual movements that canonical Traditionalists did not take hadth text into consideration as their scholarly efforts were limited to the evaluation of hadth chains. Aforementioned notion - in my opinion - originates from shallow study of methodology adopted by canonical hadth critics، as a deeper look into their scholarly works reveals that sciences of hadth includes the authentication and disparagement of traditions as well as comprehension and deduction from hadth content. The sole objective of early Traditionalists from transmission، collection of hadth، its evaluation، authentication and disparagement was to safeguard the true meaning of Sunnah and to transmit it in its pure form to the successors. In fact the peculiarity of their work is that they exert all efforts in order to deal with hadth as a single undivided whole، where examination of content was not irrelevant to the evaluation of chain، their conscientious efforts recorded in major works of hadth show how they evaluated content of hadth to determine that it was not contradictory to Shari‘ah، or with another sound tradition، as there was a possibility that a certain reliable reporter made mistake or speculated in transmitting the meaning of hadth. Therefore we witness them disparaging a certain transmitter for his negligence and errors whereas his hadth is forsaken، moreover they would not consider him a Traditionalists or muhaddithn if excessive speculations were found in his report. This research paper aims at investigating the aforementioned hypothesis.
Body composition of Labeo calbasu is categorized as water, protein, lipids, ash as main components of body. And carbohydrates are present in edible portion of fish as negligible amount. Total sample that were collected are fifty. All these samples collection is done from Indus River, Ghazi Ghat, Dera Ghazi Khan, Southern Punjab, Pakistan. Labeo calbasu proximate composition of edible portion is of great interest. All samples have average wet total weight of edible portion is 156.44 g that ranges from 112.17-205.45 g and dry weight average of edible portion 27.26 g. Total length average 23.35 cm that ranges from 22.2-32 cm size. By applying statistical formulas with the help of computer relationship value of different parameters were calculated. The values of correlation coefficient (r), standard error of mean, intercept (a) , regression coefficient (b) and value of ?t? also be evaluated.
When %Water (x) taken as constant, value of r for different parameters is calculated as % Ash wet weight (y) 0.781, % Ash dry weight (y) 0.240, % Fat wet weight (y) 0.328, % Fat dry weight (y) 0.407, % Protein wet weight (y) 0.974, % Protein dry weight(y) 0.418. Condition factor taken as (x) value of (r) for different calculations is calculated as % Water (y) 0.259, % Ash wet wt., g (y) 0.330.% Fat wet wt., g (y) 0.204. % Protein wet wt., g (y) 0. 211. Body dry weight, g (x) relationship with different intercepts gives the r value as % Water (y) 0.728, % Ash wet wt. (y) 0.557, % Ash dry wt. (y) 0.201, % Fat wet wt. (y) 0.204, % Fat dry wt. (y) 0.338, % Protein dry wt. (y) 0.349. Total length cm (x) give r value for % Water (y) 0.009, % Ash wet wt. (y) 0.127, % Ash dry wt. (y) 0.146, % Fat wet wt. (y) 0.088, % Fat dry wt. (y) 0.041, % Protein wet wt. (y) 0.045 and % Protein dry wt. (y) 0.091.Log body dry weight, g (x) relationship with different logs quantities r is calculated as Log watercontent, % g (y) 0.721, Log total ash content, g (y) 0.797, Log total fat content,0.209, Log protein total content, g (y) 0.974. At Log total length, cm and different intercepts log relationships r value is Log water content %, g 0.0167, Log ash total content, g (y) 0.416, Log fat total content, g (y) 0.226, Log fat total content g 0.226, Log protein total content g 0.310. It is concluded in Labeo calbasu that average of water content in fish edible tissues are 82.38 %. Total ash average weights are 3.30 g while % ash wet weighs 2.13 g and % ash dry weighs 12.22 g in edible portion of fish. Total fat contents are 3.46 g while wet fat weighs 2.23 % g and fat dry weighs 13.02 %. Total protein average 20.49 g proteins in wet fish edible flesh weight 13.25 % and protein dry weighs 74.76 %.