مولانا معین الدین اجمیری
دوسرا حادثۂ وفات حضرت مولانا معین الدین اجمیری کاہے جو ۱۰ محرم الحرام ۱۳۵۹ھ کواجمیرمیں پیش آیا۔مولانا کی ذات ہندوستان کے علماء میں ایک نمایاں مقام رکھتی تھی وہ علم وعمل دونوں کے پیکر تھے۔منطق وفلسفہ میں ان کومولانا ابوالبرکات ٹونکی مرحوم سے تلمذ خاص حاصل تھا، لیکن عام علماء منطق وفلسفہ کے برخلاف وہ دینیات اورعلوم قرآن وحدیث میں بھی درخور وافر رکھتے تھے۔اجمیر میں کتاب وسنت کی روشنی جو کچھ نظر آتی ہے اُنہی کے دم سے قائم تھی۔پھر طرفہ یہ ہے کہ وہ صرف ارباب درس وتدریس اوراصحاب وعظ وارشاد میں سے ہی نہ تھے بلکہ اُن کاشمار اُن ابطال عزیمت وحریت میں تھا جواعلاء کلمۃ اﷲ کی خاطر کانٹوں سے بھری ہوئی راہ کو دیکھ کر دل میں ذراخوف وہراس محسوس نہیں کرتے، اور ’’دل خوش ہواہے راہ کوپُرخار دیکھ کر‘‘پڑھتے ہوئے اُسے اپنے لیے’’تختہ گل‘‘ جان کربے خوف وخطر عبورکرجاتے ہیں اور’’بخاک وخون غلطیدن‘‘کو’’عاشقان پاک طینت‘‘کاشیوۂ خوش یقین کرنے کے باعث دست قاتل کے لیے اُن کی زبان سے بکمال خندہ پیشانی احسنت ولبیک کانعرہ بیساختہ نکل جاتاہے ۔وہ جمعیتہ علماء ہند کے سرگرم کارکن تھے، اُنہوں نے اس مجلس کے سالانہ اجلاس امروہہ کی صدارت اُس پُرآشوب زمانہ میں کی جبکہ ہندوستان کشمکش حریت و آمریت کی طوفان خیزیوں کے باعث ایک نہایت ہی خطرناک دور سے گذر رہا تھا اورجبکہ ملک میں عام داروگیر نے سخت اضطراب وہیجان پیداکررکھا تھا وہ اپنے عزائم میں پہاڑ کی طرح مضبوط تھے۔جرم حریت کوشی کی پاداش میں جیل خانہ بھی گئے لیکن علالت کے باوجود ان سب تکلیفوں کوہنسی خوشی برداشت کرگئے اوران کی جبین استقلال وہمت مایوسی وخوف کی ایک شکن سے بھی آشنا نہیں ہوئی۔ مسلمانوں میں جوقحط الرجال پایا جاتاہے، اُس کے پیش نظر مولانا ایسے جامع کمالات اورپیکر علم وعمل کاسانحۂ مرگ یقینا بہت زیادہ...
Islamic literary legacy is diverse and multidimensional in Sub-continent despite its being prone to religious b and the issue of migration integral part of Islamic literary legacy is the Quranic translations & interpretations. The main aspect of these translations & interpretations are the endeavors put forward by Muslim as well as non-Muslim scholars. Keeping in view the endeavors translations & interpretations of Quran, the non-Muslims minorities of sub-continent can be divided into two groups. The first group of part is based on the followers of Judaism, Parsee, Buddhist, Sikhism, Jainism and idols of Kalash whose translations and interpretations is not well known. Whereas, the second group endure Christians, Hindus and Qadyanis. Christians and Hidus consider Quran as non-revealed. Since the style of their interpretations is based on criticism and rejection in aggressive manner. Whereas the interpretations by Qadyanis are focused on religious polarized beliefs and ideologies taking into considerations Quran as revealed. That’s why Qadyanis interpretations are not accepted in Muslim community. The criticism by non-Muslims writers has resulted in rational approach for study of Quran instead of tendency based on esteem among Muslim. This paper represents aforementioned non-Muslims services regarding Quranic Interpretations and Translations which are distinguished in Muslims Interpreters.
The present research aimed to assess extremism tendencies, personality traits, social axioms and gender role beliefs among graduating young adults. This research was completed in three independent studies. Study I aimed for translation, and cross language validation of the Social Axioms Survey Scale (Leung et al., 2002) into Urdu. Study II, the pilot study was done to assess psychometrics for the study variables and general trends in the data on a sample of 210 young adults. Results showed that Urdu Version of Social Axioms Survey Scale, Urdu version of Gender Role Beliefs Scale (Khan, 2006), Urdu Version of NEO PI-R (Chishti, 2002), and The Extremism Scale (Altaf, 2002) were internally consistent and can be used in the study. 9 Study III: the main study was carried out to achieve the overall objectives of the study. Sample (N=1000) consisted of young adults with an age range of 1824 years and mean age of 21.40 years. Alpha reliability coefficients were established on a large data set of adults for the Urdu versions of Social Axioms Survey Scale ( , .81 - .92); Gender Role Beliefs Scale ( , .90); NEO PI-R ( , .87 - .92); and The Extremism Scale ( , .76 - .88). Factorial structure of the study instruments was validated with 1st and 2nd order confirmatory factor analyses. All the Indices of model fit (GFI, AGFI, CFI, NFI) indicated a good fit for the Urdu versions of Social Axioms Survey Scale (.90 - .96); Gender Role Beliefs Scale (.95 - .97); NEO PI-R (.93 - .96); and The Extremism Scale (.92 - 98) with acceptable factor loadings. Norms for the domain scales (neuroticism, extraversion, openness, agreeableness, and conscientiousness) of the Urdu version of NEO PI-R (Chishti, 2002) on a data of adults in Pakistan were reported in the form of Percentiles, Z scores and T scores. Results showed that an individual with raw score of 120 on extraversion domain has 3 percentile score in present study. While at the same raw score, percentile score is 69 for the English man. These findings supported the idea of having the local norms for the NEO PI-R-Urdu version. The effects of personality domain scales on subscales of extremism tendencies were explored and it was found that neuroticism has negative impact on submission to authority and agreeableness has negative impact on hostility/intolerance and rigidity. Subscales of social axioms like social flexibility has negative impact on submission to authority; 10 fate control has positive effect on rigidity; and religiosity also has significant positive impact on power and toughness. Gender role beliefs have no direct impact on extremism tendencies. Finally, the mediating role of gender role beliefs and social axioms on relationship between personality domain scales and extremism tendencies was tested through model fit indices. Results partially supported the mediating role of both the variables. Gender role beliefs fully mediated the relationship between extraversion, and power and toughness. Multivariate analyses revealed significant differences in hostility/intolerance where men had significantly higher mean score as compared to women. Adults with high income were high in intolerance while people with low income were high in submission to authority. Adults, with high level of education, have less traditional gender role beliefs as compared to adults with low level of education. Overall, findings of the study have highlighted the role of gender, age, monthly income, level of education, neuroticism, openness, agreeableness, social axioms, and gender role beliefs to predict extremism tendencies.