مولانا شاہ عزالدین مجیبی/مولانا مفتی عتیق احمد فرنگی محلی
اس واقعہ سے چند روز پہلے یعنی مئی میں ہندوستان کے دواوربلند پایہ علماء کابھی انتقال ہوگیا،ایک مولانا شاہ عزالدین صاحب مجیبی اوردوسرے مولانا مفتی عتیق احمد فرنگی محلی۔ اوّل الذکرنے ندوۃ میں تعلیم پائی تھی، استعداد پختہ تھی، فقہ اور حدیث میں بڑااچھا درک رکھتے تھے۔ گزشتہ سال ہی انہیں صدر جمہوریہ کی طرف سے عربی اسکالر کی حیثیت سے ایوارڈ ملا تھا۔ قومی معاملات ومسائل میں حصہ لیتے رہتے تھے۔قیام خانقاہ مجیبہ پھلواری شریف میں رہتا اوروہیں درس و افتا کاکام کرتے رہتے۔ برہان کے بڑے قدردان تھے اوراسی وجہ سے ایڈیٹر برہان سے محبت کرتے تھے۔
ثانی الذکر فرنگی محل کے کاروان بہار کی آخری نشانی تھے۔بلند پایہ عالم اور بڑے فاضل بزرگ تھے۔ فرنگی محلی کے مفتی تھے اور اسی کے مدرسہ میں جواب برائے نام رہ گیا ہے، درس واہتمام کی خدمت بھی انجام دیتے تھے۔ گوشہ نشین اورقناعت پیشہ بزرگ تھے۔ [جون۱۹۷۷ء]
The conquest of Makkah is an extraordinary and unprecedented event of the Muslim history in which the Holy Prophet (PBUH) demonstrated his political discernment and strategy that Islam is an unassailable entity that can never be eradicated. Your democratic engagement in the conquest of Makkah facilitated the establishment of a government of peace and reconciliation in Arabia, which led the Arabs to grow submissive to the Sharia. They all became Muslims as a consequence of your political participation; hence, Makkah's government was then altered and structured accordingly with Islamic principles. The political role of the Holy Prophet (PBUH) in the conquest of Makkah has been addressed in this article. The methodology chosen to go ahead with this piece was astounding. However, the challenge faced during the research was: Muslims in the modern age encounter a slew of political issues. And as a result, Politicians, if they try, can overcome their challenges by remembering the Holy Prophet's (PBUH) political involvement in the Conquest of Makkah. Keywords: The Holy Prophet (PBUH), political problems, The Conquest of Makkah, Modern era.
This study explores Kamila Shamsie’s fiction as a site of postcolonial diaspora writing. Diaspora is a significant concern in postcolonial theory. Most of the research done in Diaspora Studies in general and Postcolonial Diaspora Studies in particular is related to history, economics, political science, sociology, anthropology, and psychology. Shamsie’s fiction brings to light her diasporic consciousness which is based upon her own status as a member of modern transnational diaspora. It is a presentation of a variety of diaspora characters. Also, the impact of major historical events like World War II, colonization and decolonization of India, Fall of Dhaka, Russian Invasion of Afghanistan, resultant Holy War, 9/11 and War on Terror is integral to her work and to the characters portrayed in it. The present study establishes these dimensions in her work along with an unearthing of how the power structures and the power practices designed to perpetuate hegemony of some people on others influence individuals and compel people to leave their familiar world. Simultaneously, it ascertains the identity issues created by displacement in both cases of voluntary migration or forced expulsion/exile. In her work, Shamsie also presents the hybridity and the loss of pure cultural identity created as a consequence of colonization and educational hegemony of the West. It is a qualitative research where interpretive framework of Critical Discourse Analysis (Fairclough, 2003) has been applied to the study of three novels, namely: Salt and Saffron (2000), Kartography (2002) and Burnt Shadows (2009). A text emerges from its interaction with context and prevailing social conditions. The objective of CDA is to perceive language use as a social practice. Therefore, interdiscursivity and situatedness of a text are two important factors analyzed in this work. It explores the relationships among language, ideology and power. Fairclough suggests three stages of CDA which are: Description, Interpretation and Explanation, thus the design of the study. Whereas, the theoretical framework of postcolonial diaspora theory by Edward Said (1978, 1991, 1999) along with Ashcroft et al.’s concepts of place and displacement have been chosen to substantiate alienation and sense of being out of place in diaspora subjects.