Implikasi Peran Dan Fungsi Pengawasan Bank Syariah Di Indonesia Pasca UU No. 21 Tahun 2011

The growth of the Sharia banking system in Indonesia is considered a measure of Sharia's economic success. The Indonesian Sharia Banking Supervision is responsible for regulating sharia banking activities. It is important to note that this information is from a regulatory point of view. The regulation and supervision of sharia banking activities are based on amendments to Act No. 3 of 2004 on the Bank of Indonesia, No. 23 of 1999, and Law No. 21 of 2008. After the passing of OJK Act No. 21 in 2011, Indonesian banks were granted the authority to oversee Sharia banks, which were then transferred to the JSC. The Financial Services Authority was formed due to concerns from various parties about the supervisory function of Indonesian banks in regulating Sharia banking. The JSC does not directly monitor all activities of Sharia institutions, but rather ensures that certain aspects are overseen by other institutions, such as the DPS (Dewan Pengawas Syariah).  The DPS is responsible for overseeing Sharia Financial Institutions, and is registered based on the approval of the National Sharia Council (DSN). The objective of the OJK is to meet and protect the needs and interests of the public, create a stable and sustainable financial system, and implement a financial system based on the principles of good governance, which include accountability, transparency, and independence.

Day Care Surgery at a New University Teaching Hospital: A Review out of the Aga Khan University Hospital, Nairobi

Introduction: Day Care Surgery (DCS) is the surgical care of patients on a planned non-residential basis. The objective of the study was to assess the performance of DCS in the context of a developing country within the private sector. Data from a new DCS unit was compared to internationally accepted indicators of the quality of care. Methodology: A hospital based retrospective chart review of all patients operated on within 10 surgical subspecialties was performed. The review period was the June 2006 to July 2007(12 months). Analysis (SPSS version 11.5): Outcome measures included in-patient to DCS ratio in the various specialties; inpatients qualifying for DCS; overall unplanned admission rates; morbidity rates and the number of inappropriate daycare cases. Univariate analysis was used to test for factors affecting the unplanned admission rate. A logistic regression model was used for multivariate analysis. Results: Inpatient to DCS ratio in all the subspecialties was below recommended benchmarks. Thirty six percent (36%, n=328/910) of inpatients were candidates for DCS. The unplanned admission rate was 12% (n=47/395) with lack of outpatient insurance cover being the commonest reason (48.93%, n=23/47). Multivariate analysis noted only two significant variables, ASA grading and postoperative morbidity. The overall morbidity rate of the DCS cases was 5% (n=18/395) pain being the most common type of morbidity. Almost 3 %( n=13/395) of patients were inappropriately treated as DCS patients. Conclusions: The unplanned admission rate of 12% compares unfavorably with other DCS units. Omitting cases of inappropriate insurance cover, the overall rate falls to 6.45%, comparing well to other units. The retrospective nature of the study placed important limitations on the data acquisition. DCS is a feasible system of healthcare delivery in the private sector of developing countries.