ﷺ
آپؐ کا نقشِ پا مل گیا یانبیؐ!
مل گئی ہم کو راہِ خدا یانبی!ؐ
آپؐ کی ذاتؐ نورِ ہدیٰ یانبی!ؐ
صدقۂ نورِ غارِ حرا یانبیؐ!
وادیِ قلب ہو پُر ضیا یانبیؐ!
’’دو جہاں آپؐ پر ہیں فدا یانبیؐ!‘‘
میں نہایت ہی ہوں پُر خطا یانبیؐ!
ہوں مگر اُمتی آپؐ کا یانبیؐ!
آپؐ ہیں رحمتِ دوسَرَا یانبیؐ!
آپؐ کی نسبتوں کا صلہ یانبیؐ!
بخش دے کاش مجھ کو خدا یانبیؐ!
’’دو جہاں آپؐ پر ہیں فدا یانبیؐ!‘‘
حسنِ مطلق کی کامل ادا دیکھ کر
مظہرِ نورِ ذاتِ خدا دیکھ کر
تیرگی میں ضیا ہی ضیا دیکھ کر
قبر میں چہرۂ واضحی دیکھ کر
میرے ہونٹوں پہ ہو برملا ؛ یانبیؐ!
’’دو جہاں آپؐ پر ہیں فدا یانبیؐ!‘‘
حضرتِ موسیٰ ٹھہرے کلیمِ خدا
ابنِ مریم کا دستِ مسیحا شفا
سب پہ رب کا کرم سب پہ رب کی عطا
خوب سے خوب تر عظمتِ انبیا
آپؐ ٹھہرے حبیبِ خدا یانبیؐ!
’’دو جہاں آپؐ پر ہوں فدا یانبیؐ!‘
چشمِ ’’مازاغ‘‘ کی نعمتیں مل گئیں
’’قاب قوسین‘‘ کی قربتیں مل گئیں
ربِّ کونین کی چاہتیں مل گئیں
آپؐ کو عرش کی رفعتیں مل گئیں
آپؐ پر خاص رب کی عطا یانبیؐ!
’’دو جہاں آپؐ پر ہوں فدا یانبیؐ!‘‘
کس طرح ذاتِ رب ہم پہ راضی ہوئی
آپؐ راضی تو تب ہم پہ راضی ہوئی
آپؐ ہی کے سبب ہم پہ راضی ہوئی
آپؐ کی ذات جب ہم پہ راضی ہوئی
ہم پہ راضی ہوا تب خدا یانبیؐ!
’’دو جہاں آپؐ پر ہوں فدا یانبیؐ!‘
Pakht┴n society has its own justice system which has different types of penalties and remedies to maintain the justice in the society. This study concentrates to investigate the nature of pecuniary punishment’s practice in distressing issues like killing, civil injuries and criminal offences. Perpetrators are punished to resolve the disputes. On one hand, this paper aims to find out answer to the methods of inflicting decisions in Pakht┴n’s cult and on other hand, to shed light on the legal status of arbitration regarding resolving such issues in the light of Qur’an and Sunnah. Study results illustrate that in some cases the offenders are charged in term of money to facilitate the victims, while in other cases both of the parties, perpetrators and victims, are called upon on meal for reconciliation of their dispute. Besides this, sometimes it is observed that the offenders are not only awarded pecuniary punishment but they are exiled as well.
Intensive use of chemical fertilizers has produced environmental, health and agricultural hazards besides their high cost. Microbial (plant growth promoting rhizobacteria) inoculation as substitute to chemical fertilizers could be an effective way for sustainable sunflower production. Therefore, a field study was performed at the Agronomic Research Area, Department of Agronomy, University of Agriculture, Faisalabad, to evaluate role of plant growth promoting rhizobacteria for improving nitrogen and phosphorus use efficiency in sunflower. The study comprised of two experiments carried out during 2012 and 2013 in randomized complete block design (RCBD) with three replications. In first experiment, sunflower hybrid (Hysun-33) was subjected to eleven treatments viz. Control, Recommended N (100%), 100% N + PGPR (Azospirillum) seed inoculation, 75% N + PGPR (Azospirillum) seed inoculation, 50% N + PGPR (Azospirillum) seed inoculation, 100% N + PGPR (Azotobactor) seed inoculation, 75% N + PGPR (Azotobactor) seed inoculation, 50% N + PGPR (Azotobactor) seed inoculation, 100% N + PGPR (Azospirillum + Azotobactor) seed inoculation, 75% N + PGPR (Azospirillum + Azotobactor) seed inoculation, 50% N + PGPR (Azospirillum + Azotobactor) seed inoculation. While second experiment comprised of treatments: Control, Recommended P (100%), 100% P + PGPR (Bacillus) seed inoculation, 75% P + PGPR (Bacillus) seed inoculation, 50% P + PGPR (Bacillus) seed inoculation, 100% P + PGPR (Pseudomonas) seed inoculation, 75% P + PGPR (Pseudomonas) seed inoculation, 50% P + PGPR (Pseudomonas) seed inoculation, 100% P + PGPR (Bacillus + Pseudomonas) seed inoculation, 75% P + PGPR (Bacillus + Pseudomonas) seed inoculation, 50% P + PGPR (Bacillus + Pseudomonas) seed inoculation. The results of first experiment depicted that both inoculants and their mixture with different nitrogen rates showed an increase in growth, yield, quality and nutrients uptake parameters. The results further revealed that 100% nitrogen + PGPR (Azospirillum + Azotobactor) inoculation not only produced highest achene and oil yields but also gave maximum gross and net income and benefit cost ratio during both years (2011 and 2012) of experimentation. However, 75% nitrogen + PGPR (Azospirillum + Azotobactor) inoculation produced statistically same yield as with recommended nitrogen (100%). The results of the second experiment showed significant improvement in growth, yield, quality and nutrients uptake of sunflower crop by both inoculation and their mixture sources with various combinations of phosphorus. However, maximum achene and oil yields with highest gross, net income and benefit cost ratio were obtained with the combination of 100% phosphorus + PGPR (Bacillus + Pseudomonas) inoculation during both years. But applying the combination of 50% phosphorus + PGPR (Bacillus + Pseudomonas) inoculation achieved the achene and oil yield statistically comparable to that of recommended phosphorus (100%) without inoculation. The study suggested that 25% of nitrogen and 50% of phosphorus fertilizer doses can be reduced by applying PGPR (Azospirillum + Azotobactor) and (Bacillus + Pseudomonas) inoculation sources respectively, for achieving sunflower achene yield which was obtained by using 100% nitrogen and phosphorus fertilizers without inoculation.