ﷺ
ناموسِ گدائی نہ گنوا ، اور بھی کچھ مانگ
’’اب تنگیِ داماں پہ نہ جا اور بھی کچھ مانگ‘‘
بے پایاں ہے اُس در کی عطائوں کا تسلسل
بے مثل ہے اُس در کی سخا ، اور بھی کچھ مانگ
دریائے سخاوت ہے رواں روزِ ازل سے
رکتی ہی نہیں موجِ عطا ؛ اور بھی کچھ مانگ
خود دستِ عطا بڑھتا ہے محتاج کی جانب
اس شان کا آقاؐ ہے ترا اور بھی کچھ مانگ
اسباب کی دنیا کو کیا ایسا مسخّر
صحراؤں نے قلزم سے کہا ’’اور بھی کچھ مانگ‘‘
محدود ہے صحراؤں کی وسعت؛ نہیں محدود
اُس رحمت عالمؐ کی گھٹا ؛ اور بھی کچھ مانگ
جس شمعِ حرمؐ نے کیا دنیا میں اُجالا
دل کے لئے لے اُس سے ضیا اور بھی کچھ مانگ
خالق کی عطاؤں سے عطاؤں کے وہ قاسمؐ
خالق کی عطا ؛ اُنؐ کی عطا ؛ اور بھی کچھ مانگ
ہر بار صدا آتی ہے دربارِ سخا سے
عرفانؔ! لگا اور صدا ، اور بھی کچھ مانگ!
Reformation of society and ways of training has been discussed by political experts of all the times. Seminars are also conducted on these subjects in every nook and corner of the world. The experts have led emphasis on training besides Islamic education and training. It indicates that the society cannot be reformed until elements of training are not incorporated into it. Thus, Prophets also stressed upon training besides preaching for the social system. It was the result of training that those Arabs who were enemies to one another became brothers to one another. Owing to this taring oriented education, women were given due rights in the society
Orientalism is an ancient tradition of Western scholarship which portrays Islam, Muslim societies and
Arabs in negative manner. Orientalist tradition was extended to Islamic legal scholarship during colonial
era. Ground breaking publication of a Hungarian orientalist Ignac Goldziher (d.1921) `Introduction to
Islamic Theology and Law' (1910) became the basis of all future writings on this subject. Joseph Schacht
(d.1969) a German orientalist carried his work in Goldziher's footsteps and published `Origins of
Mohammadan Jurisprudence' (1950) and 'An Introduction to Islamic law' (1964) which laid the
foundations of Islamic legal orientalism in academic writings of the Western world.
With the advent of orientalist tradition in USA during the Cold War era, leading American universities
established Oriental Studies, Near Eastern Languages and Cultures and Middle Eastern Studies
departments which worked closely with U.S. State department and Foreign Affairs department to
facilitate the goverhment to establish political hegemony over the Middle East and the Muslim world.
Two major assumptions put forward in the academic debate by the West on 'Origins' of Islamic law were
inauthenticity of hadith literature and influence of pre-Islamic non-Arab laws on the development of
Islamic law. This dissertation carries out critical analysis of writings of Western scholars during cold war
era through post 9/11 era to date, on these two issues.
The objective of this research is to study the shift in paradigms, trends, approaches and methodology
adopted by Western scholars of 21' century in their writings on Origins of Islamic law and to see how this
scholarship is related to European and American political hegemony over the Muslim world. Writings of
Harald Motzki, Jonathan Brown, Wael Hallaq and Patricia Crone and a few more are selected to analyze
21' century Western scholarship. Responses, rebuttals and critiques on the assumptions put forward by
Western scholars of 20th century are also part of this dissertation. A shift in trend and methodology is
observed in 2l' century Western scholarship on Islamic law but the essential paradigms for the study
remain the same thus putting forth similar results.
It is also observed that Western scholarship on Islam is strongly connected with its political hegemony
over the Muslim world. Methodologically Western scholarship has shifted from 20th century philological
zeitgeist to 21' century social science research but it remains within the orientalist problematique. Thus
Islamic law is portrayed as an essentially defective legal system and hadith literature the second primary
source of Islamic law remains inauthentic in Western scholarship. However there are scholars who are
aware of the fact that they are not to become hostage to biased paradigms and inadvertent commitments
to political agendas in order to promote academic honesty.