ازواجِ مطہرات ، زیادہ شادیاں اور عرب روایات
اعتراض نمبر ۹۵
نجران کے یہو دیوں نے سرکار دو عالم ﷺ کے خلاف ایک یہ الزام دھرا کہ آ پ ﷺ کی یہ ساری محنت اور جان ماری اس مقصد کے لیے ہے کہ جو مقام و رتبہ حضرت مسیح ؑ کا چلا آ رہا ہے وہ آپ ﷺ کے قبضہ میں آ جائے اور عیسائیوں اور دیگر افراد کو آہستہ آہستہ اپنے آہنی شکنجہ میں جکڑ کر اپنی پرستش اور پوجا پاٹ میں لگا لیا جائے ۔
جواب: اس اعتراض سے پہلے اس کا پس منظر بیان کرنا ضروری ہے تاکہ حقیقت سامنے آ سکے ۔ یمن کے ایک شہر نجران جو تہتر گائوں پر مشتمل تھا وہاں سے ایک عیسائی وفد ساٹھ افراد پر مشتمل سن ۹ ہجری میں آ پ ﷺ کی خدمت میں حاضر ہوا ۔ ان افراد میں رئیس الوفد عبدالمسیح تھا ‘ دوسرا شخص ایہم جو سیاسی امور کا نگران تھا اور تیسرا ان کا لاٹ پادری اور روحانی پیشوا ابو حارثہ بن علقمہ تھا ۔ صحابہ کرام ؓ عصر کی نماز ادا کر چکے تو اس وقت یہ وفد ،مسجد نبوی میں آ یا یہ لوگ بھی نماز پڑھنے لگے صحابہ کرام نے منع کر نا چاہا لیکن آ پﷺ نے فرمایا انہیں چھوڑ دو ۔ نماز سے فارغ ہونے کے بعد آ پﷺ نے ان پر اسلام پیش کیا اور قرآنی آ یات تلاوت فرمائیں لیکن انہوں نے اسلام قبول نہ کیا اور انہوں نے کہا ’’ ہم آ پ ﷺ سے پہلے کے مسلمان ہیں ‘‘۔ آ پ ﷺ نے فرمایا تم نے جھوٹ بولا ۔۔۔ تین چیزیں تمہیں اسلام سے روکتی ہیں ۔ اول صلیب کی عبادت دوم سئور کا گوشت سوم تمہارا یہ گمان کہ مسیح ؑ اللہ تعالیٰ کا بیٹا ہے ۔ (نعوذ باللہ )...
Healthy nourishment depends on healthy food. General consideration of people is of being the food safe and edible for human consumption not its effect on their spiritual selves but the Islamic terms Ḥalāl and Ḥarām emphasis on both physical and internal safety. Islam commands to avoid doubtful and dubious things rather than to use Ḥarām. The unprecedented evolution and advancement of science and technology caused a revolution in the food-science and technology as well. Many new and innovative flavors etc. Took place of organic and natural consumables. Accordingly, the Muslims were in dire need of a robust system which would be able to convince them of the Ḥalāl status of the daily consumables. The article investigates the Sharī’ah stand on the issue of blood in the light of Qur’ān, Sunnah and comparative jurisprudence study, and modern sciences related to blood. Keeping in mind the Globalized Halal Industry all the researched is coupled with combined comparative study of all Schools of Islamic Fiqh, to make easy the way of Unified Halaal Standard regarding the blood. Under the main title The paper comprises subtopics of an introduction and few chapters, which deal with definition and functions of blood, types of blood, difference between blood of aquatic and land animals, comparative study of modern sciences related to blood and Shariah status of use of the blood in various industries in term of Halal and Haram.
The baselines being linchpin of various maritime zones (internal waters, territorial sea, contiguous zone, Exclusive Economic Zone (EEZ) and continental shelf) are crucial in shaping maritime claims. Different types of baselines, depending on coastal configurations of states, are starting point for measuring maritime zones as well as controversies between the states. Straight baseline system legitimized during 1951 Anglo-Norwegian Fisheries case between Norway and UK was only meant for irregular coastal configurations. The 1958 Convention on the Territorial Sea and Contiguous Zone (hereafter TSC) embodied the judgment into a codified article. TSC provision on straight baselines transformed almost verbatim into United Nations Convention on Law of the Sea, 1982 (hereafter UNCLOS). Vague parameters of straight baselines, devoid of precision, leave much room for liberal interpretations and flexible application. Vagueness of straight baseline terms is the main cause for excessive lines having enormous impacts on various sea regimes, brewing conflicts on international maritime arena. The means of interpretation for treaty terms like ordinary meaning; object and purpose, preparatory works and state practice are unhelpful due to compromising nature of UNCLOS and scarcity of its official record. Excessive baseline claims kindle varying degree of conflicts on regimes of sea. study addresses; whether vagueness leads to excessive straight baseline claims. The Do excessive straight baselines affect the regimes of various maritime zones? How can vagueness and inadequacies prevailing in straight baselines provision be addressed in interpretation and application? The great impact of unfounded straight baselines on EEZ and Continental shelf because of interfacing of these zones with international community rights has been investigated. Different factors behind employing excessive straight baselines by the coastal states leading to controversies and instability in the oceans have been discussed. Vagueness undoubtedly exists in terms and conditions on straight baselines with divergent state practice. The study concludes that terms and phrases in Article 7 of UNCLOS are vague, unclear, non- objective and imprecise. To avoid isolated individual or regional state practices, an international pragmatic approach is needed for uniformity of straight baseline principles. A structured oceanic legal order on the pattern of Commission on the Limits of Continental Shelf (CLCS) with a watchdog capacity is need of day to monitor the coastal state claims based on straight baselines. UN Division of the Ocean Affairs and Law of the Sea are considered most apposite forum to patron such initiative.