استاد کی عظمت
اللہ تعالیٰ نے اس کائنات کو تخلیق فرمایا پھر اس کی تزئین و آرائش کے لیے اس میں پہاڑوں ، گلستانوں، میدانوں ، سمندروں ، ندیوں اور نالوں کو وجود بخشا، آبشاروں کی کھڑکھڑاہٹ پیدا فرمائی ، فضاؤں کی سرسراہٹ سے اس کے حسن میں چار چاند لگائے۔
اللہ تعالیٰ نے بنی نوع انسان کی اصلاح کے لیے مختلف اوقات میں مختلف زبانوں میں مختلف قوموں میں مختلف انبیاء کرام کو مبعوث فرمایا یہ سلسلہ چلتا رہا یہاں تک کہ نبی آخر النبین حضرت محمد صلی اللہ علیہ و آلہٖ وسلم تشریف لائے اور پھر نبوت کا دروازہ بند کر دیا گیا اور کام علماء کرام کے سپرد ہوا اور علماء کرام میں اساتذہ جو مدرس ہونے کے ناطے عظیم منصب پر فائز ہوتے ہیں انھوں نے اس فریضہ کو بڑے احسن طریقے سے سرانجام دینا شروع کر دیا اور عوام النّاس کی اصلاح کے لیے مستعد رہے۔
شیخِ مکتب ہے اک عمارت گر
جس کی صنعت ہے روحِ انسانی
اگر بنظر غائر مشاہد ہ کیا جائے تو استاد کی حیثیت، اہمیت اور مقام مسلم ہے، کیونکہ استاد ہی نونہالانِ قوم کی تعلیم و تربیت کا ضامن ہوتا ہے، استاد ہی قوم کے نوجوانوں کو علوم وفنون سے آراستہ و پیراستہ کرتا اور اس قابل بناتا ہے کہ وہ ملک وقوم کی گرانبار ذمہ داریوں سے عہدہ برآ ہوسکیں۔ استاد جہاں نوجوانوں کی اخلاقی و روحانی تربیت کرتا ہے وہاں وہ اُن کی مختلف علمی ،سائنسی، فنی ، اور پیشہ ورانہ مہارتوں کا سامان بھی کرتا ہے، والدین بچے کی جسمانی پرورش کرتے ہیں، جبکہ استاد کے ذمے بچے کی روحانی تربیت ہوتی ہے، اس لحاظ سے استاد کی حیثیت اور اہمیت والدین سے کسی طرح کم نہیں بلکہ ایک لحاظ سے ان سے بڑھ کر ہے، کیونکہ روح کو جسم پر فوقیت حاصل...
In a situation of conflict or divorce between wife and husband there generally arises the issue concerning the custody of child. Muslim scholars of Islamic law are not unanimous over who, father or mother, has the right to the custody of child. Some scholars are of the view that the mother has the right to the custody of the male child until he 7 year old, and that of the female one until her age of puberty provided that the mother does not get married to someone else. This article deals with the issue from the angle of child's welfare, and tries to come to the conclusion that if the child's welfare is taken care of by the father more than the mother, the father should be given the right to the child's custody, and vice versa.
Background: Tumor size is one of the most important prognostic factors in breast cancer and its accurate assessment is critical in planning appropriate treatment. Although histology is often regarded as the definitive way of establishing tumor size, radiological techniques, particularly ultrasonography, are usually relied upon to give an estimate of the tumor size for prognostication and treatment planning. Correlations between mammography, ultrasonography, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and pathology size have been performed in different populations with varying results however no prospective study has been done to establish the agreement between sonographic tumor size and histopathological tumor size in our population.
Objectives: The main objective of this study was to determine whether or not there was a difference between the tumor size on ultrasound and tumor size on histopathology. The relationship between tumor size on ultrasound and tumor size on histopathology was also assessed.
Methods: This was a prospective, observational survey. Women undergoing preoperative ultrasound for suspicious breast masses followed by lumpectomy or mastectomy were recruited into the study. The tumor sizes measured to the nearest millimeter on ultrasound and on histopathology were recorded side by side in a data sheet.
Analysis: The mean difference between the two sets of measurements was assessed using a paired t-test. The paired measurements were also plotted on a scatter diagram and linear regression analysis performed to establish their degree of correlation. An equation for predicting the histopathological tumor size from the sonographic tumor size was given along with 95% confidence intervals.
Outcomes: Ultrasound tended to underestimate the tumor size and the mean difference between ultrasound and histopathology was 4.3 mm (95% confidence interval of 0.8 mm to 7.8 mm; p-value of 0.0196). The equation y = 1.1758x + 0.126 best predicted the histopathology size from the ultrasound size although this did not differ significantly from the line of equality.
Discussion: This study demonstrated that tumor size on ultrasound differed significantly from that on histopathology, similar to findings from previous studies. However, due to the wide variability in the size differences, it remains difficult to accurately predict the histopathological size for an individual tumor.
Recommendations: Clinicians managing patients with breast cancer need to be aware that while ultrasound may be used to estimate tumor size, this estimate might differ significantly from the histopathological measurement.