ارشاد ڈیروی دی نظم گوئی
نظم توں مراد شعراں دا اوہ مجموعہ اے جیہدے وچ کوئی اک مرکزی خیال ہو ندا اے ۔بہت سارے شعر ہوون دی صور ت وچ خیال دی درجہ بہ درجہ بڑھوتری طاہر کرن خاطر شعراں نوں وکھو وکھ حصیاں وچ ونڈ لیا جاندا اے ۔تاں جے نظم دے معنی تے مفہوم واضح ہو سکے۔نظم وچ اک خیال یا تصور نوں موضوع بنا یا جا ندا اے تے نظم وچ شعراں دی کوئی گنتی کوئی حد مقرر نہیں ہو ندی ۔صرف خیال دے تسلسل نوں مکھ رکھیا جاندا اے ۔
خیال وانگوں نظم لئی سرنانویں دی وی کوئی قید نہیں ۔ایہدے وچ کسے وی موضوع اتے خیالاں دا اظہار کتا جاسکدا اے ۔بھانویں اور سرنانواں تاریخی ہو وے یاںجغرافیائی ،دینی ہو وے یاں دنیاوی ،تہذیبی ہووے یاں ثقافتی ،معاشی ہووے یا ںمعاشرتی ،سیاسی ہووے یاں مذہبی ، قومی ہووے یا ںانقلابی ،نواں ہووے یا ںپرانا،علمی ہووے یاں ادبی ہر سرنانویں تے دنیا دے ہر معاملے زندگی دے ہر مسئلے تے کائنات دے ہر پکھ بارے نظم لکھی جاسکدی اے ۔
سرنانویں وانگوں ایس لئی کسے خاص ہئیت دی وی پابندی ضروری نہیں ۔جیویں نظم لئی کسے وی موضوع نوں چنیا جا سکدا اے ایسے طرح ایہدے واسطے کوئی ہئیت اختیار کیتی جا سکدی اے ۔ اے بھانویں روایتی...
To general public, all videos are perceived to be true, but they may not have probative value in the Court of law. The undertaken article analyzes the admissibility and probative value of a video presented as evidence before a court in the Criminal Justice System of Pakistan (CJSP). It analyzes the relevant law and diagnoses the problems with the video evidence through the lens of the judgments of Superior Courts. The court of law objectively ascertains that a video presented as evidentiary means bears significant relevance to the fact in question. It must be admissible under the law, and it must be proved to be genuine. To fill up the gap between a “Video” and a “Video Evidence”, there is a process, which is known as video authentication. It determines that the video contents are genuine, authentic, credible, unaltered, untampered and unfabricated. The study discusses various modes of video authentication. Precedents set by superior courts of Pakistan show that convictions have been made once the courts are satisfied with the credibility of video evidence. In the court of law, video evidence is normally presented after the completion of prosecution evidence. The video is played in court and is watched by the presence. But the researcher establishes that such process does not have legal justification. The article suggests that it would be legal and proper for the prosecution to produce the video evidence through the witness, during his evidence, who is either victim, witness, recorded and/or copied the video directly from original source such as C.C.T.V system and that witness would be subjected to cross examination.
A major part of this thesis comprises synthesis of pyridyl guanidinium carboxylate receptors and investigation of their self-assembling properties. It also describes synthesis of sulfenamides derived from amino esters. Chapter I provides an introduction to supramolecular chemistry, its underlying principles, types of receptors, self-assembling systems, application of supramolecular systems and also brief introduction to organosulfur compounds. Chapter II describes synthesis of pyridyl guanidinium based receptors. Chapter III includes experimental work and spectroscopic data obtained for pyridyl guanidinium based receptors and intermediates involved in their synthesis. Chapter IV describes dimerisation studies of synthesised receptors. Synthesised systems were found to be highly stable dimers in DMSO with dimerisation constants up to 8.1 × 105 M-1 and in 60% H2O/DMSO with a dimerisation constant 24.5 M-1. Chapter V includes synthesis of sulfenyl chlorides and their use in the synthesis of sulfenamides. Spectroscopic data obtained for these compounds is also a part of this chapter. Chapter VI describes general conclusions and future perspectives of the work.