مولاناحامد اﷲ الانصاری غازی
مولاناحامد اﷲ الانصاری غازی کی شخصیت کسی تعارف کی محتاج نہیں ایک بلند عالم جید صحافی اورغازی صرف نام ہی کے نہیں کام کے بھی تھے۔سراپا عمل و جہد کی زندگی بسرکی۔دارالعلوم دیوبند میں ایک طالب علم کی حیثیت سے اور پھر اس کے لیے ایک مجاہد بھی ثابت ہوئے۔ کچھ عرصہ ڈ ابھیل میں بھی دارالعلوم کے ساتھیوں کے ساتھ علم وعمل اوردین کی خدمت انجام دینے میں جٹے رہے۔
حضرت قاری طیب صاحب کے لائق داماد تھے۔اورقاری طیبؒ کوان پر ناز تھا۔ ندوۃ المصنفین سے مرحوم حامد الانصاری غازی کاتعلق خاص الخاص رہا ہے۔ ادارہ کی طرف سے ان کی ایک کتاب ’’اسلام کانظامِ حکومت ‘‘ شائع ہوکر مقبولیت کامقام حاصل کرچکی ہے۔
حضرت مفتی عتیق الرحمن عثمانیؒ کی شخصیت سے انھیں انتہائی درجہ کی عقیدت وانسیت تھی، دہلی جب بھی آتے تو حضرت مفتی صاحبؒ سے شرفِ ملاقات حاصل کرنا ان کا اوّل کام ہوتا۔بمبئی میں ادارہ ندوۃ المصنفین دہلی کی کتابوں کاتعارف علمی حلقوں میں کراتے رہتے تھے۔
ان کے انتقال سے علمی دنیا میں ایک خلاء سا محسوس ہورہا ہے ۔ان کی اولاد میں لڑکے جلیل القدر عہدوں پرفائز ہیں، ایک سعودی عرب میں کسی اعلیٰ منصب پراور ایک امریکہ میں کسی اچھے عہدہ پرفائز ہیں۔
اﷲ تعالیٰ سے دعاء ہے کہ حامد الانصاری غازی کی مغفرت فرمائے اوران کواپنی جوار رحمت میں اعلیٰ سے اعلیٰ جگہ عنایت فرمائے آمین ثم آمین۔
[نومبر ۱۹۹۲ء]
Istilahat-e-fiqhia (Juristic terms) is of vital importance in understanding the exact meaning of the Islamic injunctions. Hadith Commentators, therefore, in their Hadith commentaries, ardently explain these terms literally as well as idiomatically. The present article, with the said perspective, studies Bazl al-Majhud fi Hall Sunan Abi Dawud, a multi-voluminous Arabic commentary of classical hadith corps Sunan Abi Dawud by renowned hadith scholar Moulana Khalil Ahmad Saharanpuri. It discovers that Moulana Saharanpuri elucidates the juristic terms with all the methods adopted by the experts of Ilm Lughat, Ilm Gharib al-Hadith, etc. He, in his elucidation, not only gives the inquiries of the experts but also evaluates them and gives his observations. However in some places he just copies the experts and doesn’t comment.
This study was undertaken to investigate the differences between art and science students of multiple
intelligence categories and learning styles at intermediate level. Population of the study comprised all the arts
and science female 12th grade students of government federal colleges of Islamabad city only. Stratified
accessible random sampling was done. 40% was the desired sample therefore two strata were made arts and
science group that were randomly selected from each stratum. Out of 5 F.G. colleges 3 colleges were selected
the reason was, in 3 F.G. colleges there were two arts and. science group Therefore, total number of sampled
colleges was 3 and total number of students was 2197. One model college was selected for pilot study.
A learning style questionnaire, and multiple intelligence scale, was administrated in sample colleges. Learning
style instrument, assessed individual's learning styles in three areas (visual, aural, kinesthetic). The second
instrument, the Multiple Intelligence Development Assessment Scale, provided information regarding
different intelligence categories, to investigate the difference between arts and science students at
intermediate level. (SPSS-X) software was used to analyze the data in this study. Independent sample t test
and simple Univariate ANOVA and Tukey test were used to examine the data. Univariate Analysis of Variance
(ANOVA) was used to test the differences in multiple intelligence categories based on demographics
information. Results revealed that the arts and science students have strongest logical mathematical
intelligence Arts students have weaker spatial intelligence whereas Science students have weaker musical
intelligence; although there were significant difference between arts and science groups. Arts students'
strongest preference was for Auditory learning style. Science student's strongest learning styles were visual
and kinesthetic.
There was no significant difference between arts and science students in demographics information based on
multiple intelligence categories.