مولانا سید مرتضیٰ حسن
افسوس ہے کہ گزشتہ ماہ میں جناب سیدمرتضیٰ حسن صاحب کم و بیش پچانوے سال کی عمر میں اپنے وطن چاندپور ضلع مرادآباد میں اورجناب نہال سیوہاروی نے کراچی میں وفات پائی۔ مولانا مرحوم اکابر علمائے دیوبند میں سے تھے۔ علاوہ علم و فضل کے بڑے خوش بیان مقرر، کامیاب مناظر اور واعظ تھے۔ تحریکِ خلافت کے زمانہ میں مرحوم کی تقریروں کی جن میں حقیقت وظرافت دونوں کاخوش گوار امتزاج ہوتاتھا ملک بھر میں دھوم تھی۔حضرت مولانا شاہ رفیع الدین صاحبؒ مہتمم اوّل دارالعلوم دیوبند سے نسبتِ روحانی تھی اور اس تقریب سے قطبِ وقت حضرت مفتی اعظم مولانا عزیز الرحمن صاحب سے تعلق ِخاص رکھتے تھے اورقطب ِعالم حضرت مولانا گنگوہیؒ کی مجلس علمی وروحانی کے مخصوص ہم نشینوں میں داخل تھے، اس لیے ذکرومراقبہ کاشغل بھی رکھتے تھے۔ ایک عرصہ تک مدرسۂ امدادیہ مرادآباد کے روح رواں رہے۔۱۹۲۰ء میں پھر دارالعلوم دیوبند کے ناظم تعلیمات ہوکرچلے گئے۔ اب ادھر پندرہ سولہ سال سے عملاً خانہ نشین ہوگئے تھے۔ خود بزرگ تھے اوربزرگوں کی نشانی تھے، سینکڑوں ہزاروں علما جن میں مولانا سید سلیمان ندوی ایسے بلند پایہ عالم بھی شامل ہیں، ان کے فیض تلمذ سے مستفید ہوئے۔حق تعالیٰ انھیں جنت الفردوس میں مقام جلیل عطافرمائے۔آمین ثم آمین۔ [جنوری۱۹۵۲ء]
Sinlessness is the hallmark ofthe Characters of Prophets (Peace he Upon them) . There is not an iota of sin in the words and deeds of the prophets (Peace be Upon them) . As a matter offact absolute pretty and sinlessness are part and paral of their character yet there are some traditions in which exhibit deviation from the collective stance of the Ummah regarding prophets. There is a narration about the interpretation ofsura Hajj. verse No 51. This narration contains disgusting things about Muhammad (SA IV) . This research article examines and analyses all the charges leveled against Muhammad (SA W) and by proofs and evidences exonerate himfrom the same.
Organizational productivity is one of the basic tools to gauge its competitiveness. Research has proven that methodologies for gauging productivity are lacking in industries globally, and mostly non-standard tools are used to measure and evaluate productivity. In Pakistan specifically, not enough efforts have been put in place to gauge and enhance the productivity of manufacturing industry. This research is focused on identifying the prevalent status of productivity in automotive industry of Pakistan and then suggesting a productivity enhancement framework. This mixed methodology research has been conducted using both qualitative and quantitative methods. Sequential explanatory design in combination with sequential exploratory design was used as suggested by Creswell [106]. Quantitative research was conducted by carrying out productivity analysis of the industry using secondary data from sample companies. Authentic government sources, such as Engineering Development Board and two national level associations i.e. Pakistan Automotive Manufacturers Association (PAMA) and Pakistan Association of Automotive Parts and Accessories Manufacturers of Pakistan (PAAPAM) were consulted for data collection. Secondary data for ten years covering FY 2000-2010 for two major automotive manufacturing firms was gathered. Total Productivity and all partial productivities were computed using methodology proposed by Sumanth [4], while Total Factor Productivity (TFP) was computed using Cobb-Douglas production function. Results gathered showed low productivity status of the industry as compared to that of international industry. In order to develop a productivity enhancement framework, qualitative research was conducted by collecting primary data through qualitative interviews from top management of 26 automotive manufacturing companies. A total of 40 interviews were conducted on the basis of theoretical saturation and theoretical sampling. Open ended questions used for survey were compiled from the internationally published literature for validity and reliability requirements. Using explanatory and descriptive study, role of technology in productivity enhancement of the industry was examined. Findings of this research have been used to develop a productivity enhancement framework for the industry. Developed framework was compared with the framework of 6 different countries, including USA, UK, Sweden, India, China and Thailand [33], [36], [37], [44], [45]. Comparison resulted in emergence of the finalized productivity enhancement framework of the industry. This framework was then implemented in one of the major auto parts manufacturing companies of Pakistan for its validation. Results of the implementation not only validated the model but also depicted that there is an immediate need to implement these concepts for productivity enhancement. The cost- effective solutions suggested in this model and its cross cultural comparisons also show that this model can be used for manufacturing industries in general in the developing countries.