منظوم تبصرہ
از حافظ عبدالغفار حافظؔ
ہیں جو اُردو شاعری سے بہرہ ور شفقت فرید
آ گئے ہیں سامنے با کرّ و فر شفقت فرید
میرے مشفق ڈاکٹر شہزاد کی خدمات پر
لکھ کے لائے ہیں مقالہ خوب تر شفقت فرید
ایم فِل کا یہ مقالہ قابلِ تعریف ہے
پا گئے ہیں منزلِ فتح و ظفر شفقت فرید
کیا ہی کہنا ڈاکٹر شہزاد کی خدمات کا
جائزہ لیتے نہ کیوں دل کھول کر شفقت فرید
زندہ و جاوید جیسے ڈاکٹر شہزاد ہیں
کیوں نہ ہو جاتے اُسی صورت امر شفقت فرید
جامعہ نے کر لیا منظور تھیسز آپ کا
ہو گئے اس طرح ڈگری ہولڈر شفقت فرید
دو مبارک باد بڑھ کر حافظِ ؔشیریں نوا
کیوں کہ اس کے مستحق ہیں سر بہ سر شفقت فرید
قطعہ تاریخ طباعت
فکرِ تاریخِ طباعت جب ہوئی حافظ مجھے
یہ کہا ہاتف نے بحر نام ور شفقت فرید
لکھ دعا کا سر ملا کر محسنِ شیریں سخن
۴ ۱۴۳۸
۱۴۴۲ھ
تا کہ خوش ہو جائیں اُس کو دیکھ کر شفقت فرید
خراجِ محبت و عقیدت
عاشقِ نعت نبیؐ شہزاد ہیں
اک سفیر آگہی شہزاد ہیں
جو مٹائے نفرتوں کی تیرگی
ہاں وہی تو روشنی شہزاد ہیں
یہ فروغِ نعت میں سر گرم ہیں
اہلِ دل کی زندگی شہزاد ہیں
لمحہ لمحہ ذکر سرورؐ لب پہ ہے
طالبِ شہرِ نبیؐ شہزاد ہیں
جانتے ہیں اہلِ دل ، اہل نظر
چاہتوں کی چاندنی شہزاد ہیں
جن کا شیدائی ہے یہ احمد خیالؔ
وہ بہارِ زندگی شہزاد ہیں
از احمد خیال
Whenever any issue regarding the religious matters was put up in the presence of the Holy Prophet (SAW), he himself explained that logically. The companions of the Holy Prophet (SAW) also sought his consent in such matters. However, there were some differences among the Companions (Saḥabas) regarding some of diligently-conceived views. Later on, such differences were multiplied and caused sectarian issues. In consequence of diligently-conceived opinions and efforts to address the issues of the Holy Qu’rān and Sunnah, four distinct sects emerged. Moreover, such differences took a different form in the later years which further led to the heinous act of “Takfeer”. Currently, the mutual enmity is at a great premium especially in Pakistan. This article will introduce and analyze the selected books, trying to indicate strengths and weakness of the subject matter discussed in books, in addition to examine the methodologies used in.
This study aimed to explore academic achievements of students in biology at secondary level across schools systems and gender. A newly developed, field tested and validated tool Biology Achievement Test (BAT) was used to collect the data. A total of 289 students of grade ten were recruited through a cross sectional survey from public (n=5) and private (n=5) schools of district Chitral. Of the total students (n=289) 164 (56%) boys and 125 (43%) girls participated in the research study. Biology Achievement Test (BAT) was administered to explore students' academic achievements across school system and gender. Results demonstrated that students scored only 31% of the total score, exhibiting a weak conceptual understanding in selected concepts of biology. Overall results across school systems indicated that private schools have performed slightly better than their Public counterparts; however, the difference was not significant (p>0.05). Moreover, comparison of MCQs and CRQs across school system demonstrated that private schools have scored significantly higher in MCQs and public schools have shown significantly better performance in CRQs (p> 0.001 for both). Furthermore, public schools have performed significantly better in study of life ecology and biodiversity with a small effect size (r=-0.18).Similarly, private schools have performed significantly better in cell biology (p< 0.01), with a medium effect size (r=0.27). Students' performance in cognitive domains revealed that private schools students have shown better performance in knowledge and reasoning level while public schools have performed better in application level. However, the differences were too small to be significant. Furthermore, overall academic achievement across gender revealed that girls have performed significantly better as compared to boys (p<0.001). Students' performance across gender demonstrated that girls have outperformed boys in both MCQs and CRQs, with a significant difference (p<0.001). Performance in content domains across gender showed that girls have performed significantly better in life process as compared to boys. In cognitive domains, girls have performed significantly better in knowledge and reasoning levels (p<0.001) as compared to boys.