مغربی بنگال اردو اکادمی کی جانب سے شائع ہونے والی اس مختصر تصنیف کو پروفیسر عبد الحق نے قدردان اقبال محترمہ "ممتا بز جی" وزیر اعلیٰ حکومت مغربی بنگال کے نام کیا ہے۔ پروفیسر عبد الحق نے 2009ء میں بھی علامہ اقبال پر ایک مونوگراف لکھا تھا جس کا دوسرا ایڈیشن 2014ء میں شائع ہوا ۔ اس مونوگراف کو " سارے جہاں سے اچھا " کا عنوان دیا گیا تھا۔ حرف آغاز میں پروفیسر عبد الحق نے بتایا کہ علامہ اقبال پر یہ ان کا دوسرا مونوگراف ہے۔ یہ مونو گراف پہلے سے بالکل مختلف ہے۔ پہلے والے مونو گراف کا توضیحی مطالعہ بھی باب ہذا میں شامل ہے۔ اس میں نثری موضوعات نہیں جبکہ موجودہ مونوگراف میں زندگانی ، کتابیں اور شاعری کے موضوعات دے کر نثری تفصیل ہے پھر انتخاب کے بعد نظم، غزل، رباعی اور فارسی شاعری کے عنوانات ہیں۔ ان تخلیقات میں اقبال کے فکروفن کی روح ہے۔ کوئی بھی نتخاب اس حصہ کلام کے بغیر مکمل نہیں ہو سکتا اور نہ اس کے حوالے کے بغیر اقبال کے فلسفہ وشعر پر گفتگو کی جاسکتی ہے۔ اس کے موضوعات کے تحت گفتگو اس توضیحی مطالعہ میں شامل کرتے ہیں۔
Hydro politics is the modern term for water issues. Every country wishes to protect its sweet water resources, especially those that have difficulties with rivers that run through more than one country. Water is required for the survival of over 180 species. This study is center on the importance of water to all living things, including humans, as well as to countries and their economies. The conflicts and treaties are also covered in the area of study on hydro-politics on the river Jhelum between India and Pakistan. Both countries have fought wars over water more than once, and if the water distribution issue can handle peacefully then their relationship may improve. The Jhelum River began in the disputed area of Jammu and Kashmir and flows through Pakistan and meets the Indus River. The distribution of Jhelum water was settled by the Indus Water Treaty in 1960, but India's repeated breaches made it a problem between the two neighboring states and one of the reasons for conflict between them. The research's main goal is to not only examine the causes of conflict but also to predict how it will be resolved in the future.
Banking industry is considered the most crucial financial intermediary in service sector in any state. The
concept of knowledge management has been around for past many decades but its true potential has been
realised in recent times. Despite of so much attention to this concept, its perfect description and explanation is
still far from complete. As Knowledge Management (KM) practices have benefitted many business
organizations from various industries, its adaptation to the banking institutions is still unrealised.
Ever growing global competition has introduced a new world order, 'Innovate or Die'. Constant innovation is
an enormous challenge for modern organizations. Many of the organizations look for concepts and practices to
enable themselves to develop and maintain sustainable competitive advantages over others. Knowledge
management (KM) philosophy has gained importance in the business world as one of the critical enablers for
innovation activities.
This study was conducted with the objective to investigate the impact of various dimensions of KM; knowledge
acquisition, knowledge dissemination and responsiveness to knowledge on innovation in the banks of
Faisalabad. The author used Structure equation modelling (SEM) technique to develop a model among three
endogenous KM factors and one exogenous factor innovation and attempted to study this relationship with
authentic empirical evidence and a firm belief that KM philosophy, if implemented in its true spirit, may
improve the organization's ability to innovate and perform effectively.
One of the major findings of the study was the significant effect of all three dimension of KM on innovation. The
empirical evidence acquired through test results of the Confirmatory Factor Analysis (CFA) and structural
model showed that all factors support innovation activities but on a different proportion. The results of the
study indicated that responsiveness to knowledge has the most favorable effect on innovation, in comparison
to other dimensions of KM. Knowledge gives best results when it is shared and used purposefully. Knowledge
must be put in use through processes, routines and systems to promote innovation. Innovation is a result of
active use of knowledge and idle knowledge is of no help for innovation.