خدائے سخن‘‘ کی نظمیں
نظم کے معنی ’’موتیوں کی لڑی‘‘ کے ہیں۔موتیوں کو لڑی میں پرونا ہے۔لیکن ادبی اصلاح میں نظم سے مراد اشعار کا وہ مجموعہ ہے جس میں کوئی ایک مرکزی خیال ہوتا ہے۔بہت زیادہ اشعار ہونے کی صورت میں خیال کی درجہ بدرجہ بڑھوتری کو ظاہر کرنے کے لیے اشعار کو مختلف حصوں میں تقسیم کر لیا جاتا ہے تاکہ نظم کے معنی اور مفہوم کو اجاگر کیا جا سکے۔نظم میں ایک خیال یا تصور کو موضوع بنایا جاتا ہے۔نظم میں اشعار کی تعداد مقرر نہیں ہوتی صرف خیال کے تسلسل کو سامنے رکھا جاتا ہے۔
نظم میں موضوع کی کوئی پابندی نہیں ہوتی۔اس میں کسی بھی موضوع پر اظہار خیال کیا جا سکتا ہے موضوع چاہے تاریخی ہویا جغرافیائی دینی ہویا دنیاوی،تہذیبی ہویا ثقافتی،معاشی ہو یا معاشرتی،سیاسی ہو یا مذہبی،قومی ہو یا انقلابی،قدیم ہو یا جدیدعلمی ہو یا ادبی غرض ہر موضوع اور دنیا کے ہر معاملے،زندگی کے ہر مسئلے اور کائنات کے ہر پہلو پر نظم لکھی جا سکتی ہے۔
موضوع کی طرح نظم کے لیے خاص ہیئت کی پابندی ضروری نہیں جس طرح نظم کا کوئی بھی موضوع منتخب کیا جا سکتا ہے اسی طرح نظم لکھنے کے لیے کوئی بھی ہیئت اختیار کی جا سکتی ہے۔اگرچہ روائیتی طور پر نظم کی کچھ خاص اصناف کے لیے خاص ہیئت مخصوص ہیں۔مگر عام طور پر نظم کے لیے کوئی خاص ہیئت مقرر نہیں کی گئی،یہ بات ہمیں عطا محمد عنبر کی نظموں کی کتاب ’’خدائے سخن‘‘ میں دیکھنے کو ملتی ہے۔انہوں نیاپنے اس شعری مجموعہ میں جو نظمیں شامل کی ہیں۔ان کو مختلف ہیئتوں میں لکھا ہے کہیں کہیں نظم کا تاثر پھیکا پڑتا دکھائی دیتا ہیاور غزلیہ رنگ نمایا ں نظر آتا ہے۔کیونکہ آپ کی بہت ساری نظموں میں سے ایک سے...
This article discusses the Economic Reflections of Asean countries in facing the Covid-19 Pandemic in several Asean countries, namely Vietnam, Malaysia and Indonesia. Vietnam's economic growth was victorious, the economies of various countries in other Southeast Asian regions were battered by the corona virus. The process of economic growth is influenced by two kinds of factors, namely economic factors and non-economic factors. Economic factors, which are none other than production factors, are the main force affecting economic growth. Malaysia has proven to the world community that its country is capable of managing its economy even in challenging circumstances. He quoted the IMF as global economy recorded negative growth and in Indonesia it seems that contraction in income activities in some income classes is affected. In the second quarter there is a slowdown, then in the third quarter the savings are enormous. It could be that consumption, which has been a factor in economic growth, will be a challenge. In an effort to maintain economic stability during the Covid-19 pandemic. This reflects that the economies of ASEAN countries, even in the world, are currently under the same pressure due to the Covid-19 virus pandemic, the world economy this year will experience a recession.
The problem under investigation was to find out whether achievement through Mastery Learning (ML)
and Direct Instruction (DI) was dependent on the aptitude of student-teachers in the graduate teacher
training programme or not. The objectives of the study were to ascertain the aptitude of student-
teachers before teaching them through Mastery Learning and Direct Instruction, to compare the high
aptitude student-teachers in their academic achievement through Mastery Learning and Direct
Instruction. Further objectives were to compare the low aptitude student-teachers in their academic
achievement through Mastery Learning and Direct Instruction. Moreover, to compare the academic
achievement of student-teachers having high and low aptitude taught through Direct Instruction and to
compare the academic achievement of Mastery Learning group and Direct Instruction group of
student—teachers.
It was an experimental study. The population of the study consisted of student-teachers enrolled in B.
Ed. programme in Federal College of Education, Islamabad. The sample comprised of 116 student-
teachers of B. Ed. class of Federal College of Education. Research findings revealed that the student-
teachers having high and low aptitude differed in their achievement after teaching them through
Mastery Learning and Direct Instruction respectively, the difference being in favour of those taught
through Mastery Learning. The student-teachers with high and low aptitude did not differ in their
achievement when exposed to teaching through Mastery Learning. The student-teachers with high and
low aptitude however differed in their achievement when exposed to teaching through Direct
Instruction, the difference being in favour of student-teachers having high aptitude. Mastery Learning
was found to be equally effective for student-teachers having high and low aptitude for teaching,
whereas Direct Instruction was found to be effective for student-teachers having high aptitude.
The major recommendations of the study were: Keeping in view the significance of aptitude, the
enrollment selection criteria may suitably be modified. The text, lesson plans, co-curricular activities
and behaviour of teacher may have a positive influence on aptitude. Therefore, these aspects may be
improved and further research may be conducted on these aspects. Instructional material should be
developed based on these two models of teaching for different subjects at different grade levels. These
two models of teaching should be tested on under-achievers and over-achievers in terms of their
achievement.