سلطان کھاروی دیاںکافیاں
کجھ و دواناں دے وچار نیں کہ کافی عربی زبان دا لفظ اے جیدے معنی نیں مکمل ، پورا یا کافی ہونا۔ کیوں جے قرآن مجید وچ ربی فرمان اے۔
’’ کفیٰ باللہ شہیدا اللہ دی گواہی کافی اے ‘‘ (۱)
’’ کفیٰ باللہ وکیلا اللہ کارساز کافی اے ‘‘(۲)
’’قرآن حکیم وچ ایہہ لفظ کافی تے مکمل دے معنی وچ استعمال ہویا اے۔ ایس لئی شاعری دی اجہی صنف نوں کافی آکھیا گیا ہے۔ جہدے وچ اک مکمل مضمون اک مکمل خیال یاں اک مکمل جذبے دا اظہار کیتا گیا سی۔ شاعری دی ایس صنف نوں پڑھ کے یاںسن کے ہور کسے صنف یاں شاعری دے مطالعے یاں سنن دی لوڑ نہیں رہندی ۔ کیوں جے ایہدے راہیں بیان ہون والا مضمون یاں خیال ، ادبی ذوق ، روحانی لوڑاں تھوڑاں تے وجدان دی مکمل حد تک تسکین کر دیندا اے۔ ایسے پاروں شاعری دی ایس صنف نوں کافی آکھیا گیا اے۔‘‘(۳)
کافی تے سنگیت دا آپسی گوہڑا سمبندھ ہے ۔ کافی وچ سنگیت پکھ اگھڑواں ہوندا اے۔ ایس لئی سنگیت توں بنا ں کافی مکمل نہیں ۔جے ایہہ آکھیا جاوے کہ شاہ حسین نے کافی تے سنگیت نوں لازم و ملزوم بنا دتا اے تاں کجھغلط وی نہ ہووے گا۔ اونہاں اپنیاں کافیاں بارے واضح شبداں وچ لکھ دتا، پئی ایہہ کافی فلاں راگ یاں راگنی وچ گائی جاوے مثال دے طور تے اوہناں نے اپنی ایس کافی نوں راگ جے جے ونتی وچ گاون دی ہدایت کیتی اے۔
متراں دی مجمانی خاطر دل دا لہو چھانی دا
کڈھ کلیجہ کیتم بیرے سو بھی...
Where Islam takes the protection of human life on first priority there it places the fluctuation and safety of one's property and ownership on the second priority_ Qura’nic Verses, sayings of the Prophet and civil and criminal juristic laws stress the protection of property__ The extravagancy, misuse, theft, robbery, usurpation, aleatory, deception and alike have been termed unfair means regarding the property. Besides, according to Muslim jurists there are some other elements, if not checked may lead to deterioration of property_ like disposition of property during immaturity, lunacy, drunkenness and inebriety, stupidity etc. In this connection Islamic Law introduces the rules of Hajr (interdiction) which ensure the sanction upon such a person found suffering from the above imperfection and forbids him to make disposition in his own property and terms it invalid for further legal effects. In juristic terminology such rules are called Hap (interdiction) .
This research work was performed to study the antecedents of individual decision making in the higher education sector of Pakistan and to examine the effects of such decisions on organizational performance. Specifically, eight theoretically driven and significant antecedents, including work-family conflict and interpersonal conflict as individual conflicts; leadership skills, emotional intelligence and self-efficacy as individual abilities; and time pressure, information level and risk as situational forces, were studied in relation to faculty decision making, which was measured in terms of rational, intuitive, dependant, avoidant and spontaneous decision-making styles employed by faculty members. In addition, the consequent effects of such faculty decision-making styles on organizational (University) performance were examined. Nine hypotheses (H1-H9) were formulated to test the theoretical model based on the relationships among individual conflicts, abilities, situational forces, decision-making styles and organizational performance in the higher education environment. The hypotheses were partially supported, except for one fully supported hypothesis (H4). The questionnaire method was utilized to collect data using quota sampling from a targeted sample that consisted of faculty members working in these higher education institutions (HEIs) of Pakistan. A total of 722 questionnaires were distributed to these faculty members, from which 516 valid questionnaires were returned, yielding a response rate of 72%. The survey results showed that individual conflicts are significant predictors of individual decision-making behavior because individual conflicts inversely predict rational and intuitive decision-making styles, resulting in higher usage of avoidant and spontaneous decision-making styles. Correspondingly, higher individual abilities resulted in more use of rational and intuitive decision making by faculty members, which made them less inclined towards avoidant and spontaneous decision making. Similarly, time pressure, information level and risk as situational forces were also found among the significant antecedents of individual decision-making styles. Likewise, faculty conflicts and situational forces were also found to be significant moderators for the relationships between faculty abilities and University performance. Such faculty decision-making styles also significantly contribute towards University performance and mediate the relationship of their antecedents and University performance. The significance and implications of the study findings are also discussed. These findings can be comprehensively utilized in the formulation of faculty development programs and for the betterment of the higher education institutions in Pakistan.