سیرتِ صحابہ کرام کی روایات کے اصول و ضوابط : معاصر آراء کا تجزیاتی مطالعہ

Researchers, Scholars and historians have rendered invaluable services on important topics such as the biography of the Prophet ( P.B.U.H) and the Biography of Sahaabah. But unfortunately some writers have included in their writings some traditions and baseless historical references about the holy congregation of the Companions which are not worthy of the holy congregation and do not meet the rules and regulations of the traditions of these biographies and histories ۔ Leading historians of the present day have done unparalleled work on the Seerah of the Companions in the case of the writings and compilations of the Seerah and history. Has done research work on relations with But in the beginning (in the case) as well as in the context, the principles of Seerah  and history have been discussed in detail and we have tried to bring out all the principles that are standard, accepted, in the Seerah and the character of the Companions and the disputes of the Companions. I am going to pave the way for balance and moderationIn The following Lines, a special study or the principles of biography and history described by contemporary historians such as Maulana Shibli Nomani ( 1913) Maulana Saeed Ahmed Akbarabadi ( 1985) and Maulana Nafe (2014) is presented. In this regard, efforts will be made to clarify how the path of moderation can be taken in this regard, how the honor of Ahel Bayt and Sahabah can be  maintained and how such traditions  can be avoided as a result. There was no mention of Ahle –e- Bayt or Zat –e- Sahaba or there was no element of division.

A Randomised Comparative Trial of Seven Versus Fourteen Day Triple Therapy for Helicobacter Pylori Eradication at the Aga Khan University Hospital, Nairobi

Background: Helicobacter is associated with a number of important upper gastrointestinal conditions including chronic gastritis, peptic ulcer disease, and gastric malignancy. Proton pump inhibitor -based triple therapies are considered the standard regimens for Helicobacter pylori eradication, but the optimal duration of these regimens is still controversial. Local studies are required to evaluate the H. pylori eradication rates in a country for adequate eradication to prevent H. pylori infection and complications Objectives: The main objective of this study was to compare 7 day and 14 day regimens and determine the optimum duration of triple therapy for H. pylori eradication. Methods: A prospective randomised comparative trial of 7 and 14 day H. pylori eradication triple therapy at the Aga Khan University Hospital Nairobi. One hundred and twenty patients with dyspepsia and H. pylori infection were randomized to receive esomeprazole, amoxicillin and clarithromycin for either 7 days (EAC 7) or 14 days (EAC 14). Compliance and side affects were assessed two weeks after start of therapy and H. pylori eradication was assessed by H. pylori stool antigen done four weeks after treatment. Results: Both the intention-to-treat (ITT; n = 120) and per protocol (PP; n = 97) analyses showed no significant differences between the eradication rates of EAC 7 (ITT 76.7%; PP 92%) and EAC 14 (ITT 73.3%; PP 93.6%; ITT p = 0.67; PP p = 0.76). Poor compliance was reported in only one patient who was in EAC 14 group. Incidences of adverse events were comparable. Conclusion: 1-week and 2-week triple treatments for H. pylori eradication are similar in terms of efficacy, safety and patient compliance.