شفیق الرحمن قدوائی
شفیق الرحمن مرحوم اگر چہ شہرت و ناموری کے عام معیار سے کو ئی بڑے آدمی نہ تھے مگر اپنے ایثار و قربانی، اخلاق وکردار، اخلاص و عمل اور خاموش اور بے لوث خدمات کے لحاظ سے بہت سے بڑے بڑے لیڈروں پر فائق تھے، جامعہ ملیہ کے لئے تو انھوں نے اپنی زندگی وقف کردی تھی اور سرد و گرم دور میں بھی اس سے جدا نہ ہو ئے، اور یہ کہنا غلط نہ ہوگا کہ جامعہ انہی کی محنت و جانفشانی کی بدولت زندہ رہ گیا، ظاہر وباطن دونوں میں مسلمان اور اپنے اوصاف کی بنا پر ہر جماعت میں مقبول تھے، کا نگریس اور حکومت دونوں کے سنجیدہ طبقہ میں ان کا بڑا وقار و وزن اور اخلاقی اثر تھا، مگر وہ اتنے بے لوث تھے کہ کبھی اس اثر سے فائدہ اٹھانے کی کوشش نہیں کی، ان کو بنیادی تعلیم کا عملی تجربہ تھا، اس کے وہ ماہر تھے، اس لئے یو این او کی جانب سے اس کام کے لئے انڈونیشیا بھیجے گئے تھے، ابھی وہ وہیں تھے کہ گذشتہ الیکشن میں کانگریس نے ان کو دہلی اسمبلی کے لئے مقرر ہو ئے، مگر اس سے بھی ان کا فائدہ اٹھانے کا موقع نہ مل سکا، تھوڑے ہی دنوں کے بعد بیمار پڑگئے، اور چند مہینے بیمار رہ کر ۳؍ اپریل کو انتقال کیا، انتقال کے وقت کل ۵۳ سال کی عمر تھی جو سیاست کی دنیا میں عین شباب کی عمرہے، مسلمانوں میں اب ایسے مخلص اور باعمل آدمی مشکل سے پیدا ہوں گے، اﷲ تعالیٰ اس پیکر اخلاص کو اپنی رحمت و مغفرت سے سرفراز فرمائے۔ (شاہ معین الدین ندوی، اپریل ۱۹۵۳ء)
Fish Aggregating Devices (FAD's) have long been used by fishermen in South Buton Regency. This study aims to determine the utilization of FAD distribution as a fishing aid by purse sein vessels in the waters of Kadatua District, South Buton Regency. This study aims to determine the utilization of FAD distribution as a fishing tool by purse sein vessels in Kadatua District, South Buton Regency. Data collection methods include FAD point data taken from GPS (Global Position System) fishermen and dominant catch data from purse sein fishermen. The results of the study obtained data on the distribution of FADs in Kadatua District spread between a distance of 0-12 miles, during the study the coordinates of FADs were obtained as many as 79 coordinate points owned by fishermen in Kadatua District. FADs used by purse sein fishermen to carry out fishing operations have 24 FAD points, which are spread over a distance of 0 – 12 miles. In April the distribution of FADs used as fishing aids by purse sein vessels was at a distance of ± 0 – 12 miles, while in May and June FADs used as fishing aids were at a distance of ± 2 – 12 miles. The dominant fish catch data for purse sein fishermen is 690 kg in April, 525 kg in May and 735 kg in June. The dominant catch during the study was dominated by scad fish (Decapterus spp). The level of effectiveness of the dominant catch of purse sein fishermen is highest at a distance of 4-12 miles with a total catch of 1,070 kg of the total catch of 1,950 kg.
Introduction: Estimating the risk of future cardiovascular (CV) events is an essential step in the management and prevention of cardiovascular diseases. Many cardiovascular risk tools are available such as the Framingham Risk Score (FRS), the American Heart Association/ American College of Cardiology (AHA/ACC) and the International Society of Hypertension and World Health Organization (ISH/WHO) risk charts. Regrettably, none of these tools has yet to be validated based on data from our Kenyan population. This study, therefore, sought to compare the accuracy of FRS and ACC/AHA in a Kenyan population. The risk estimates derived from the CV tools were correlated with coronary artery calcium score (CACS), a well-established reliable predictor of future risk of cardiovascular events.
Objective: Determining the level of agreement between coronary calcium score and traditional cardiovascular risk models for coronary artery disease risk stratification in a multiethnic population at a tertiary healthcare institution in Kenya.
Design: A cross-sectional study
Methods: Data were collected retrospectively from the medical records of 200 patients referred to the Radiology department for a CT coronary artery calcium score.190 patients met the inclusion criteria. Comparisons for risk stratification were made according to FRS, ACC/AHA, WHO/ISH and CACS and the agreement (Kappa) and correlation (Spearman rho) between them were calculated. Statistical significance was set at p
Results: There was poor agreement (Kappa >0.191) between CACS and the clinical CVD riskmodels in the Kenyan population studied. In relation to this, 83.6%, 81.8 % and 66.2% of the intermediate risk group according to FRS, ACC/AHA and WHO/ISH, respectively, were down-classified by CACS. Moreover, 81.6%, 84.6% and 66.7% of those who would qualify for aggressive management as per FRS, ACC/AHA, and WHO/ISH risk-based algorithms, respectively, would not qualify for the same management as per the CACS.
Conclusion: The poor agreement between CACS and these clinical CVD risk scores suggests that the clinical CVD risk tools currently used in our Kenyan population might be incorrectly stratifying CV risk in patients. This highlights the need to externally validate these CVD risk models in our population to better risk predictions and set appropriate population-wide thresholds that are essential to aid better clinical decision making.