چلے چلو کہ منزل ہے ابھی نہیں آئی
ہے جستجو کہ خوب سے ہے خوب تر کہاں
اب ٹھیرتی ہے دیکھیے جا کر نظر کہاں
منزل کے حصول کے لیے جدوجہد اور کدوکاوش ہرذی روح کا وتیرہ رہا ہے۔ منزل انہیں ملتی ہے جو جستجوئے منزل میں اپنے شب وروز گزار دیتے ہیں۔ منزل انہی کا استقبال کرتی ہے جو اس کے حصول کے لیے راستے میں آنے والی رکاوٹ کو ختم کر کے اپنا سفر جاری رکھتے ہیں۔ کچھ لوگ منازل کے تعین میں ہی اپنی زندگیاں صرف کر دیتے ہیں۔ لیکن وہ نہیں کر سکتے کہ اپنی منزل مقصود کا انتخاب کر لیں۔ بے معنی اور لایعنی باتوں کی طرف توجہ ان کی عادت ثانیہ بن چکی ہوتی ہے۔ بعض لوگ ایسے ہوتے ہیں جو منزل کا تعین تو کر لیتے ہیں لیکن عاقبت نا اندیشی کی بدولت ان کا تعین ہی صائب اور درست نہیں ہوتا۔
حشرات الارض سے لے کر انسان تک جو اشرف المخلوقات گردانا جاتا ہے ہر ایک اپنی اپنی منزل کی طرف گامزن ہے۔ مورومگس کی منزل اور ہے، گل و لالہ کی منزل اور ہے، جو ئے نغمہ خواں کی منزل اور ہے۔ حریرو پر نیاں کی منزل اور ہے، زمین پر رینگنے والے کیڑے کی منزل اور ہے، پھول کے گرد بھنبھنانے والی شہد کی مکھی کی منزل اور ہے، غلاظت کے ڈھیر پر چکر لگانے والی مکھی کی منزل اور ہے۔ گلستان سرسبز میں چہچہانے والی بلبل کی منزل اور ہے، برگد کے درخت پر بیٹھے بوم کی منزل اور ہے، آبادی کے مضافات میں شجر بار آور کی منزل اور ہے، ویرانی میں کھڑے خشک تنے والے درخت کی منزل اور ہے، فضاء میں محو پرواز عقاب وشاہین کی منزل اور ہے مردار کے گرد چکر لگانے والی گدھ کی منزل اور ہے۔
اس...
This research article is based upon critical analysis of D.S Margoliouth’s indictment regarding pious lineage “Nasb e Muṭahharra”. Generally Orientalists have tried to affect the image of the Prophet Muḥammad (s.a.w) and prevailed uncertainties. It affects a large number of Muslim Scholars, intellectuals and youngsters because Orientals’ are well aware that Muslims cannot be defeated in battle-fields unless they are defeated in the field of faith and ideology. Our aim is to protect less aware Muslims, intellectuals and youngsters form the pseudo and grimy views of the Orientalists. Like other prejudice Orientalists D.S. Margoliouth have also indictments regarding lineage (Nasb e Muṭahharra) in his book “Muḥammad and The Rise of Islam”. Margoliouth argue with texts of Qur’ān and Ḥadith, without having any relation with the passage, to identify the essence of his ill well, hatred and prejudice with in the eyes of Muslims and common readers at large. This article concern five allegations of D.S. Margoliouth on the lineage “Nasb e Muṭahharra” and concludes that he failed to maintain his objectivity in the description of lineage “Nasb e Muṭahharra”.
Cotton is the most important fiber crop of Pakistan. It is an input intensive crop but it is inevitable for the textile sector of country. About 60% of the imported pesticide is applied to cotton crop that disturbs the ecosystem by polluting natural resources. Similarly, there is intensive use of fertilizers and irrigation water. Realizing the fact that production of cotton in Pakistan poses a serious threat to environment, WWF-Pakistan, in collaboration with IKEA, launched ‘Pakistan Sustainable Cotton Initiative’ (PSCI) in 2005 to motivate the farmers for Better Management Practices (BMPs) through intensive training. Cotton is the source of income for millions of farmers and any cotton related intervention directly affects their livelihoods. In this context, the main objective of this research was to analyze the sustainable cotton initiative in Punjab, Pakistan with a livelihoods perspective. The PSCI was launched in five cotton producing districts of Punjab province. In the present study two districts, Toba Tek Singh and Bahawalpur were selected purposively because these districts had maximum concentration of registered farmers under Sustainable Cotton Initiative. From each district, one tehsil was selected purposively. From selected tehsil 10 Learning Groups (LGs) were selected randomly. From each LG, 20 farmers were selected randomly; thereby making a sample size of 400 respondents. Both quantitative and qualitative methods were used to collect data. The quantitative data were analyzed by using Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS) while qualitative data through content analysis technique. Kirkpatrick model was used for impact evaluation and livelihood framework was used for livelihood analysis. The results revealed that majority of the respondents were literate and smallholders having land less than 12 acres. The awareness level of farmers about the use of pesticides, water saving methods and use of organic fertilizers increased after joining SCI. There were positive changes in learning and reaction of respondents towards training but due to limitations of credit facilities, unavailability of botanical pesticides, no additional price for sustainable cotton and non-availability of alternative pesticides and approved seed, the sustainability remains in question. Following Kirkpatrick model, the analysis indicated that a significant majority of the respondents joined SCI and received training. Significant paired mean differences about the awareness of harmful and beneficial insects of cotton showed the positive impact of training. Farmers used to control the insect/pests of cotton with chemicals before training by applying chemicals at various crop growth stages (vegetative, flowering, and boll formation) but after training substantial percentage of them started to use botanical (neem extract, dhatora extract), cultural, and mechanical methods. Similarly, a majority of the respondents were not aware of precautions while spraying before the training by SCI-LG but after getting training majority of them started precautionary measures during spraying. A majority of the respondents thought that skill about insect pest control had enhanced because of SCI trainings. Slightly less than half of the respondents reported that tendency of disease attack on other crops was decreased and small number of the respondents said that it was increased. More than half of the respondents reported that human and livestock diseases had been decreased due to reduced pesticide use. Results regarding the impact of SCI on livelihood assets showed that skills about insect pest control, cotton picking, sustainable cotton production and water saving practices increased. Social assets of the respondents also increased due to interaction with other farmers outside the village, interaction with Govt. extension field staff and WWF staff. Physical assets of the respondents like land fertility also increased. Yet, financial assets of the respondents remained the same. The results of study demonstrated that such interventions should take care of the local livelihood realities because the farmers of the study area were not getting extra premium for sustainable cotton production and thus their interest was diminishing. The study recommended that WWF should develop proper interaction and linkage among other organization to facilitate the farmers at union council level. Sustainable cotton producers should be entertained with support price and credit facilities. Farmers should be provided alternative pesticides by public agriculture department (Extension) to reduce the use of chemicals on cotton.