سید صدیق حسن
گزشتہ مہینہ سید صدیق حسن صاحب مرحوم کا حادثہ وفات ایسے وقت پیش آیا جب معارف چھپ چکا تھا، اس لیے تعزیت کا فرض ادا نہ ہوسکا، یہ اتفاق ہے کہ ان کی وفات سے صرف تین چار دن پیشتر ندوہ کی مجلس انتظامیہ کے جلسہ میں ان سے ملاقات ہوئی تھی، پھر دوسرے دن وہ ملنے کے لئے آئے، اس وقت یہ گمان بھی نہیں ہوسکتا تھا کہ یہ آخری ملاقات ہے، اعظم گڑھ واپس آنے کے دوسرے دن معلوم ہوا کہ مرحوم نے عالم غربت میں جنت کی راہ لی، اس سے اور بھی دل متاثر ہوا، مرحوم اپنے اوصاف و خصوصیات میں مومن کامل، اخلاص وﷲیت، حسن خلق، سادگی و تواضع، خدمت خلق، اہل حاجت کی امداد و دستگیری کا نمونہ اور غریبوں اور بے نواؤں کا ملجا و ماویٰ تھے، ان کی فیض رسانی عام تھی، کسی طبقہ اور فرقہ کی تخصیص نہ تھی، ہر حاجت مند کے لئے ان کا دروازہ کھلا ہوا تھا، عقیدۃً اور عملاً پکے مسلمان تھے، ان کے یہاں ہر ہفتہ قرآن مجید کا درس ہوتا تھا، جس میں بہت سے مسلمان حکام شریک ہوتے تھے، ان میں انھوں نے ایک مذہبی ذوق پیدا کردیا تھا، دینی و اسلامی اداروں سے ان کو بڑی دلچسپی تھی، ندوے کے رکن رکین اور بڑے معاون و مددگار تھے، دارالمصنفین سے بھی ان کو مخلصانہ تعلق تھا، اس کی مجلس انتظامیہ کے رکن بھی تھے، ان کا مذہبی اور اسلامی تاریخ کا مطالعہ بھی وسیع تھا، انھوں نے جمع و تدوین قرآن پر ایک طویل مقالہ لکھا تھا، جو معارف کے اس نمبر میں چھپ رہا ہے، اس سے ان کے علمی و دینی ذوق اور اس میں دقت نظر کا اندازہ ہوگا، شعر و ادب کا بھی ستھرا ذوق رکھتے تھے، رسمی غزل سرائی کے علاوہ...
The hall mark of Shah Waliullah has been advocate moderation and the communal spirit of Isla shuns worldly attitude and abhors rejection of the wor and offers a middle path. There is no extremism in Isla and Shah Wali Ullah has preached the same. The juris the Sufis and the Muhaddisseen have taken up a differe line of thinking regarding "Tassawwuf" --- yet th essential spirit of Islam is the path of moderation. T spiritualism and physical world has to be kept in balance— with moderation and balance. It is this aspect of Sha Waliullah's writings that has been highlighted in th article.
This study intended to investigate misconceptions and errors commonly made by the students at primary level, finding out the reasons for these misconceptions and designing a remedial intervention for removing these misconceptions. The following research questions were developed to accomplish the task: • What are the misconceptions of students in learning mathematics at primary level? • What are the possible causes of these misconceptions of students in learning mathematics at primary level? • How can these misconceptions be rectified / removed? • How can teachers help the students to learn mathematics in a better way and remove the targeted misconceptions? The study was conducted in 12 sample schools and concepts included in the investigation were not limited to grade IV rather, all contents of mathematics were included from grade I to IV, excluding grade V. The grade V was excluded for the reason that the pre-test was administered in the beginning of the grade V study. The content tested through the pre-test was classified into eight concept areas namely, numbers, operations on numbers, fractions, operations on fractions, decimals, measurement, information handling and geometry. It was expected that the study would focus on misconceptions in few of these eight areas, but the findings of the pre-test and interviews with the teachers compelled the researcher to include all the eight areas as a significant number of misconceptions was found in all of the concept areas. The study was a mixed design approach (quantitative and qualitative). The pre-test and the post-test provided quantitative data while the interviews with the teachers and sample students helped to collect the qualitative data.On the basis of identification of the misconceptions and errors through the pre-tests, four students from each of the 12 schools were interviewed along with their teachers. The analysis of the qualitative and quantitative data provided insight about the causes of them is conceptions of students, and to remove these misconceptions a teachers training program was developed and conducted.At this stage, the study was converted into Pre test-intervention-post-test design keeping only one school out of the 12 schools as control group and the remaining 11 as the experimental group. Key misconceptions include numbers and operations on numbers; these were considered difficult by the students due to misconceptions regarding numbers’ names (language problem) and their place value. Fractions were thought as two numbers instead of part of a whole. Decimals were considered mostly on the basis of digits without having proper understanding of the place value of the digits written in a decimal number. Understanding of units for measuring different quantities was not entrenched due to not using measuring tools practically by the students. Mostly estimation of length, mass and area were made full of mistakes. Scale for drawing a graph,both line and bar graphs was not understood; it was seemed that students were having the wrong conception as they were not trained to draw a graph. Geometry was full of misconceptions starting from measuring a line segment or drawing a line segment of given measurement.The use of simple geometrical tools like protractor, straight edge, compass or set squares was felt difficult by most of the students and their teachers. The training of the teachers of the experimental group was focused on providing an opportunity to them to have an experience of doing mathematics as well as consolidating content including knowledge they were lacking.Misconceptions of the students in different concept areas were discussed with the teachers.The difference in gain scores of the experimental group students provided evidence that the students’ achievement improved in most of the concepts after being re taught by the experimental group teachers.