دنیا بڑی مکار
ہر دم رہیں چوکنا یار
اکھاں کھول ٹریں دلدار
کسے وی تینوں معاف نہیں کرنا
پھر توں رونا دکھڑے جرنا
خالی بھانڈا عقل دا بھرنا
فیر سوچنا اے بیکار
اس دنیا نوں سمجھ توں بھائی
اندر وڑ کے کرن صفائی
رب رسول دی بات بھلائی
ایہہ دنیا ہے بڑی مکار
ایہہ دنیا سب دھوکے بازی
عشق مجازی تلکن بازی
نہ اوہ شہید تے نہ اوہ غازی
دنیا نال جو کردا پیار
ہر پاسے ہے افراتفری
پھردی اے ابلیس دی نفری
زندگی ہر دی اوکھی بسری
نہ ملیا چین قرار
گھر گھر ہوندی پئی بدخوئی
مہر محبت اُٹھ گیوئی
ہر دم دیندا یار دھروئی
توبہ اللہ استغفار
بھانویں گھر وچ ہون نہ دانے
کیبل چلدی ، وجدے گانے
ٹر گئے یار اوہ لوگ سیانے
آوے گھنگرو دی چھنکار
رناں روز بازار نوں جاون
اوتھے جا ایہہ خوشیاں پاون
کھڑ کھڑ ہسن ناں شرماون
ہوون ناں اوتھے بیزار
شادیاں دے کیہو جئے وطیرے
داج چ منگن موتی ہیرے
کھجل ہوون سب بے پیرے
پر نہیں کر دے گفتار
کڑیاں منڈے کالج پڑھدے
ہر کوئی تکے نکلدے وڑدے
چنگے لوکی ویکھ کے سڑدے
میری توبہ ہے لکھ وار
مطلب دی ہن رہ گئی یاری
مہر محبت اٹھ گئی ساری
ہر نے جانا وارو واری
قبر کریندی نت پکار
بھرے بازار مسیتاں خالی
اُجڑے باغ تے روون مالی
ہر جا ہوئی اے بدحالی
ہووے شالا فضل غفار
مسجد نوں آباد نہ کردے
ڈیریاں دے وچ حقے دھردے
رب رسول توں مول...
To maintain and enhance social peace and mutual interaction among people it is mandatory to resolve their mutual conflicts. The eradication of mutual conflicts and working for reconciliation is obligatory on the Muslims. Al-mighty Allah has declared reconciliation and resolution of conflicts among all the Muslims as legitimate action. There are numerous verses of the Holy Quran and Hadith of the Prophet where Muslims have been ordered for reconciliation aiming to promote brotherhood and peace in society. The main rationale behind this is to bring harmony and peace in the social order of life. What are the pre-requisites of reconciliation from Sharia’s perspective, in which conflict reconciliation is permissible and in which cases it is not allowed. This study emphasizes to answer the above mentioned question. Furthermore, efforts have been made to provide a sharia’s foundation for those who are involved in the process of reconciliation in the form of Taḥkīm. This will not only encourage them, but will help in the maintenance of peace in the society. Similarly, a comparison will also be made between the merits and demerits of Pakhtūn’s traditional reconciliation process, and important suggestions will be made to make the Pakhtūn’s traditional reconciliation process more productive and valuable.
The historiographical writings produced by the court writers in medieval north India focused on lives of the sultans and their nobles, rebellions, military campaigns, conquests, and administration. This statist discourse represented elite culture and seems silent on the sociocultural, socio-religious, spiritual and intellectual life of the common people. Resultantly, social history of medieval India remained an ignored area of study. Social history is interested in studying long-run trends and structures in society and culture. It focuses on experience rather than events or actions, while identifying patterns from daily life. Keeping this in view, the historiographical gap on social history of medieval India can be adequately filled by sufi literature and its varied genres. It can help construct a more informed view of social history of medieval India, with a particular focus on its ‘Indo-sufi culture’. The present research aims at emphasizing the significance of sufi literature in the historic literary traditions of South Asian history. It explores the formation and functioning of the thirteenth- and fourteenth-century north Indian society by utilizing tadhkirah literature with a particular focus on Siyar al-awliyā [Biographies of the Sufis] authored by Amir Khurd Kirmānī, a Chishtī adept, in 1361-64. Based on Siyar al-awliyā, the present study offers a vivid account of a diverse range of social, cultural, religious, intellectual, spiritual aspects of medieval India ranging from, but not limited to, the development of vernacular languages and dialects, place of women, Muslim education, food culture, dressing trends, building and construction, prevalent diseases, spiritual life, recognition of female spirituality, question of conversion, Hindu-Muslim relations, ‘ulema-sufi and khanqāh-madrassa dichotomies, curricula and scholarship, transmission of knowledge and methods of teaching, production of sufi and non-sufi literature, and issues, principles and writings on samā‘or devotional sufi music. In addition, it offers an overview of varied forms of state-sufi relationship, such as meditational, symbiotic and conflictual, as well as socio-economic profile of medieval India. In a nut shell, the study argues that sufi tadhkirah writings help provide profound insights into minute details of social realities in medieval India. Modern scholars like Richard M. Eaton, Shehzad Bashir, Nile Green along with others also highlight the importance of xi utilizing sufi literature and urge to use these writings to fill the gaps in socio-historical perspective on history. The present study opens a window to our past and serves as corrective to many of the mistaken assumptions regarding Muslim-Hindus divide, absence of female Sufis, and strict segregation of sexes in sufi khanqahs. The study brings to the fore the dire need to shift our focus of research from state-centred court writings to lesser-studied sources of history like sufi tadhkirahs