نواب جعفر علی خاں اثرؔ لکھنوی
افسوس ہے کہ ۶ جون کو نواب جعفر علی خاں اثر لکھنوی نے انتقال کیا، وہ اس دور کے استاد فن شاعر اور اردو زبان و ادب کے نامور محقق تھے، اس کے جملہ متعلقات پر ان کی نظر بڑی گہری اور محققانہ تھی، اور اس میں ان کا قول سند کی حیثیت رکھتا تھا، ان کی ذات لکھنؤ کی تہذیب و شائستگی اور قدیم شرافت و وضعداری کا نمونہ تھی، ان کی زندگی کا بڑا حصہ سرکاری ملازمت میں گذرا، کلکٹری کے عہدے سے ریٹائر ہوئے لیکن تصنیف و تالیف و تلاش و تحقیق کا مشغلہ ہمیشہ جاری رہا اور انھوں نے اردو زبان و ادب کے مختلف پہلوؤں پر محققانہ مضامین اور مستقل کتابیں لکھیں، ان کا سب سے بڑا کارنامہ فرہنگ اثر ہے جس کی پہلی جلد شائع ہوچکی ہے، ان کی وفات سے اردو زبان کا ایک بڑا محقق اٹھ گیا، اور قدیم تہذیب کی ایک اہم یادگار مٹ گئی، اﷲ تعالیٰ ان کی مغفرت فرمائے۔ (شاہ معین الدین ندوی، جون ۱۹۶۷ء)
Allah used to send Prophets to deliver his message and to provide guidance to the people in every field of life. Different Prophets brought divine religions with them and make people convince to that particular religion. For the purpose of guiding people, Allah made a formal arrangement of sending down divine books. Among those, Torah, Gospel and the Holy Quran are the three books on which this paper will focus on Torah, Gospel and Holy Quran are followed by Jews, Muslims and Christians respectively. This paper emphasizes on the respect and status these books give to their prophets. As three of these have been sent down by Allah, researchers are interested in knowing the similarities in these books with reference to esteem and prestige these books offer to their holy prophets, i.e. Hazrat Moosa (A.S), Hazrat Issa (A.S)and Hazrat Muhammad (PBUH).
In the recent past various researches have been conducted regarding the concept of matching/mismatching of teaching and learning styles; and its role in teaching learning process. Some of these researches emphasize that matching of teaching and learning styles in institutional academic programs help in improving students‘ academic performance and developing their interest and motivation towards learning. However some researchers oppose any such role and argue that there is no solid empirical evidence to conform to this idea of teaching learning styles.The researcher, therefore, decided to examine the relation of teaching learning styles with students‘ academic performance by conducting this causal-comparative research to put forth some further evidences across Pakistani culture. The overall purpose of the study was to explore the effect of matching/mismatching of teaching and learning styles on students‘ academic achievement in higher education. The study was causal- comparative in nature to study the cause and effect relationship between matching/mismatching of teaching learning styles and students‘ academic achievement. The sample for this study consisted of 120 teachers and 240 students of BS-4 year program in four disciplines (Physics, Chemistry, Botany and Mathematics) from six public sector universities of Khyber Pakhtunkhwa. Felder-Solomon Index of Learning Style (FSILS) was used for the identification of learning styles of students while Teaching Style Instrument developed by Letele et al. (2011) was used to identify teachers‘ teaching styles. These styles of students and teachers were then analyzed to see if they matched or mismatched. In order to see the effect of matching/mismatching on students‘ academic achievement, the final score of the students in the subjects taught by the teachers participating in the study was considered. The collected data was then tabulated and organized across various tables. Data analysis was made with the help of SPSS (Statistical Package for Social sciences). For comparing means, t-test for independent samples was used. The results showed that Visual learning style was the most favorite learning style followed by Balanced and Sensing learning style. Teaching style analysis showed that Visual teaching style was the most favorite style followed by Abstract and Sequential teaching styles. Group statistics indicated 42.75% matched cases and 57.25% mismatched cases. T-test for independent samples revealed a significant difference (p=.000) between the mean scores of matched group and mismatched group of students; and it was concluded that the students with matched learning styles performed significantly better than students with mismatched learning styles. In light of the findings, recommendations were advanced for teachers, students, educationists, researchers and policy makers.