سری پرکاش جی
افسوس ہے کہ گذشتہ مہینہ ہندوستان کی دو نامور شخصیتوں سری پرکاش جی اور پروفیسر محمد حبیب نے وفات پائی، سری پرکاش کی شخصیت مختلف حیثیتوں سے بڑی اہم تھی، وہ ہندوستان کے مشہور فلسفی صوفی ڈاکٹر بھگوان داس کے فرزند اور پنڈت جواہر لال نہرو کے پرانے معتمد علیہ رفیق تھے، انگلستان کی تعلیم کے زمانہ سے لے کر ہندوستان کی جنگ آزادی اور اس کے بعد تک ہر مرحلہ میں دونوں کا ساتھ رہا، آزادی کے بعد سری پرکاش حکومت کے ذمہ دار عہدوں پر رہے اور بڑی خوبی سے اپنے فرائض انجام دئیے اور اپنے اخلاص اور سلامت روی کی بنا پر پاکستان میں بھی ہائی کمشنری کے زمانہ میں مقبول رہے اور دونوں ملکوں کو قریب لانے کی کوشش کی، وہ ہماری پرانی مشترک تہذیب کی یادگار اور ہندو مسلم اتحاد کے بہت بڑے علمبردار تھے اور آخر تک اس پر قائم رہے، ان کا سب سے بڑا وصف ان کی بے تعصبی، فراخدلی اور اخلاقی بلندی تھی، وہ سیاست میں بھی صداقت و اخلاص پر عامل تھے، جو آجکل کے سیاسی لیڈروں میں کمیاب ہے اس لیے آزادی کے بعد کے حالات سے بہت بددل تھے، عرصے سے خانہ نشینی اختیار کرلی تھی، لیکن کبھی کبھی اپنے خیالات اخبار کے ذریعہ ظاہر کرتے رہتے تھے، ایک دو مرتبہ پنڈت جواہرلال نہرو کے ساتھ دارالمصنفین بھی آئے تھے، اور یہاں کے بزرگوں سے ان کے تعلقات تھے، وہ جس تہذیب کی پیداوار تھے اس کا دور اب ختم ہوگیا، سری پرکاش اس کی آخری یادگار تھے، اب ایسے نمونے نہ پیدا ہوں گے۔ (شاہ معین الدین ندوی، جولائی ۱۹۷۱ء)
The death penalty is one of the core issues which have been widely discussed around the world. As capital punishment has been the part of the Islamic legal system, the Quran and hadith explicitly established the penalties in various serious crimes. A majority of the world‟s nations has abolished the death penalties from their constitutions, but most of the Islamic countries firmly believe in this system. One root cause of it is that the Holy Quran and hadith provide the justification for capital punishment. Further, several Islamic countries where Islam has the status of the state religion, allow the application of the death penalty. This work has prompted us to expose that the Islamic penal code is well-established in the legal and political systems of Islamic countries and the impact of religious traditions have an indirect impact on the implication of the death sentence. Since the death penalty is even now broadly established in Muslim countries, there is also increasing support in several of these states to abolish of the death penalty. Some secular activists have distorted the Quranic verses dealing with the death penalty to support their instance. For different reasons, they claim that political governments may use the death penalty as cover to suppress their political rivals. Our findings reveal that secular propaganda against the Islamic penal system is based on wrong assumptions and a result of Islamophobia. This research article can provide a logical discussion on the issue of capital punishment, rooted in the true spirit of the Islamic punishment system.
Exogenous shocks have been studied in organization studies literature to investigate specific events that trigger sensemaking in organizations. The focus of majority of this research is how these triggers create discontinuity in the organizational routines and how actors make sense of these events to restore order. However, this narrow focus ignores the impact of multiple intensities of exogenous shocks that trigger sensemaking across different levels in an organization and the key role of enactment in organizational transformation and changes in internal organizational control. To address these theoretical gaps, this dissertation focuses on a large public-sector organization – Punjab Irrigation Department (PID), Pakistan – to empirically investigate the impact of multiple exogenous shocks of different magnitudes that triggered a process of sensemaking resulting in the organizational transformation with changes in internal organizational control. More specifically, this dissertation explores research questions related to distributed sensemaking across different hierarchical levels, enactment of sensemaking of various groups of actors, systematic differences in sensemaking across these groups of actors and the power asymmetries within these groups through an interpretive research methodology. The research design consisted of three cases of exogenous shocks that were witnessed by the PID in the last two decades. For the first case, i.e. the 2010 flood, I conducted a pilot study for six months of the flood affected districts in the province of Punjab. It was supplemented by in depth interviews with officials from PID during the main study. The second case consisted of institutional reforms in PID for which I conducted a longitudinal study to understand how reforms have evolved over a period of last twenty years. The last case consisted of inclusion of external stakeholders in the maintenance and repair works in iii PID. I conducted interviews with PID staff and the external stakeholders to understand their role in the organizational transformation. I coded all the data of interviews in MAXQDA to conduct qualitative thematic content analysis. I then analyzed the main themes from the data using multiple theoretical perspectives to develop my findings. My analysis shows the enactment of sensemaking of these exogenous shocks varied across different hierarchical levels in the PID. Actors at different hierarchical levels used the ambiguity and uncertainty of the situations to enhance their sphere of control in the organization. The role of identity and systemic powers by virtue of their designation played a key role in the strategic action they engaged in to enact changes in the organizational routines. In doing so, this dissertation contributes to the institutional change/transformation research in the field of organization studies by providing in-depth context-specific analysis of enacted sensemaking in a large public-sector organization. Moreover, this research also adds valuable insights about how power asymmetries in organizations impact the process of institutional maintenance and change.