ہجرت مدینہ
ہجرت مدینہ سے قبل کئی مسلمان اذیتوں اور تکلیفوں کے سبب حبشہ ہجرت کر چکے تھے۔وہاں بھی قریش نے پل بھر سکھ کا سانس نہ لینے دیا۔اپنا وفد بھیج کر شاہ حبش سے درخواست کی کہ انھیں اپنے ملک سے نکال دیں۔شاہ حبش نے درخواست مسترد ہی نہیں کی بل کہ مسلمانوں سے کہا کہ میرے ملک میں جہاں چاہو رہو۔اب ایک اور مقام کی طرف مسلمان بہ حکم رسولﷺ مدینہ ہجرت کرنے لگے۔ایک ایک دو دو موقع پاکر جانے لگے۔دوسری طرف قریش کے ظلم و ستم کی وارداتیں بڑھتی گئیں۔ طرح طرح کی اذیتیں دیں۔یہاں تک کہ قریشی بی بی کا شوہر جو غیر کفو ہوتا اس کی ہجرت کرنے کا پتہ چلتا‘پکڑ لاتے اور ظلم ڈھاتے نیز حفظ ما تقدم کے تحت اس کی بیوی کو ضمانت کے طور پر نظر بند کر دیتے۔بعض شوہروں کو ہجرت سے روکتے‘ نہ رکتے تو قید کر دیتے۔ مسلمان بچارے پٹتے تھے لیکن آہ و زاری نہیں کرتے تھے تکلیفیں سہتے مگر حر ف شکا یت زبان پر نہیں لاتے تھے جو جو ظلم کر سکتے تھے قریش نے روا رکھا لیکن ظالم کو کیا خبر کہ مظلوموں پر کیسی قیامت گزر رہی ہے ۔ ہر طرف دکھوں اور دردوں کے پہرے تھے پھر بھی وہ صبر کا پہاڑ تھے ڈٹے رہے اور زبان شکر گزاری کے ترانے الاپتی تھی ۔ خد اکا نام لینا جرم تھا ، نماز یا تلاوت قرآن کر نا موت کو دعوت دینا تھی ۔ آفات و آلام ان کے تعاقب میں تھے اور بقول انوری جو بلا آسمان سے آتی ہے انوری کے گھر کا پتہ پوچھتی ہے گویا رات کی سنگینی کا عالم یہ تھا کہ خود حضور ﷺ ( جن کی حفاظت کا ذمہ خود خدا نے لیا تھا ، خطرے سے باہر نہ تھے ۔غرض ہر ظلم...
Plagiarism is a serious offense that defies the ethics of scholarship and research. Research students need to pay substantive attention to the dynamics and contours of plagiarism in their creative, ethical, and academic endeavors. Scholarship avenues such as online tutorials and work assignments are important sources of instructions for plagiarism-avoidance among students. The current study explores the frequency of consultation of scholarship avenues and the usage of plagiarism-avoidance techniques among research students in social sciences. The study also recommends a scale to investigate plagiarism-avoidance techniques. Furthermore, it also examines the level of the study in predicting the usage of plagiarism-avoidance. Using the online survey technique, 108 research students from Pakistan were sampled. The questionnaire was uploaded on several student-based research groups of social media, including; Facebook, and Yahoo groups. Bivariate linear regression analysis was used for hypothesis testing. Findings revealed that scholarship avenues lead to greater usage of plagiarism-avoidance techniques among research students (R2 =0.065). Supervisors, class-fellows, colleagues, and faculty of the department are prominent human scholarship avenues. Similarly, articles and books from the web, books from the library, the anti-plagiarism policy of the Higher Education Commission (HEC), and lectures delivered in the classroom were leading informational scholarship avenues. Stage of the study and consultation of the scholarship avenues were predictors of usage of plagiarism-avoidance techniques. It is recommended that (i) plagiarism-avoidance is promoted through prevention rather than detection, and that (ii) scholarship avenues (e.g. Delivering lectures, institutional policy, and interaction with relevant websites) are used for enhancing awareness about intellectual dishonesty.
A Study in Indices of Discrepancy between Students ‘Learning Styles and Their Actual Grade Achievement at Masters’ Level Every person has a preferred way of learning that is called Learning style. It is a characteristic way of reaching to the solution of the particular problem. The present study was conducted to find out the indices of discrepancy between students’ learning styles and their actual grade achievement at the masters’ level. It was to find out which type of learners is better in terms of actual grade achievement. The mean difference was also to be found out between learning styles of male and female students, urban and rural students, mean difference due to difference of fathers’ academic qualification, mothers’ academic qualification, and parents’ monthly income. All the students of Social Sciences and Management Sciences studying in third and fourth semester in public sector universities of Rawalpindi and Islamabad constituted the population which was two thousand and seventy six. Eight hundred and twenty students were chosen as sample. The Stratified Random Sampling Technique was employed for selecting the sample. The Kolb’s Learning Style Inventory Version III was used for assessing learning styles of students. The students’ first two semesters’ results were used in order to find out the grade achievement. Data were analyzed by using, percentages, T -test, and one way ANOVA. After analysis it was found out that Divergent learning style was learning style of majority of student irrespective of the department or subject. It was concluded that there was a significant mean difference of learning styles in grade achievement at Masters’ level. The divergent, assimilative, accommodative, and convergent learners acquired higher grades respectively. It was also found out that residential location, academic qualification of mothers, and monthly income of parents brought significant mean difference in learning styles of students. No significant mean difference was found between learning style of male and female students, Along with that no significant mean difference was observed between learning styles due to academic qualification of fathers.