اسم ِ استفہامیہ :أنّٰی کہاں؟
ارشادِ ربانی ہے:
"اَنّٰى لَهُمُ الذِّكْرٰى وَقَدْ جَاءَهُمْ رَسُوْلٌ مُّبِيْنٌ"۔ [[1]]
"ان کے لئے نصیحت کہاں ہے؟ کھول کھول کر بیان کرنے والے پیغمبر ان کے پاس آچکے"۔
رسولِ مُبین کے دو مطلب ہیں ۔
ایک یہ کہ اس کا رسول ہونا اس کی سیرت، اس کے اخلاق و کردار اور اس کے کارناموں سے عیاں ہے۔
دوسرا یہ کہ اس نے حقیقت کو کھول، کھول کر بیان کرنے میں کوئی کسر نہیں اٹھا رکھی ہے۔اُس وقت یہ ماننے کا کوئی فائدہ نہیں : سو ارشاد فرمایا گیا کہ " اس وقت ان کے لیے نصیحت کا کوئی موقع کہاں باقی رہا جبکہ اس سے پہلے آچکے انکے پاس کھول کر بیان کرنے والے ایک عظیم الشان رسول " ۔ ایسے عظیم الشان رسول جن کی صداقت و حقانیت روز روشن کی طرح واضح تھی۔ اور واضح ہے۔ مگر پھر بھی یہ لوگ ایمان نہیں لائے تو اس کے بعد اب کیسے اور کیا ایمان لائیں گے؟ سو اس وقت ان کی تذلیل و تخجیل کیلئے اللہ کی طرف سے انکو یہ جواب دیا جائے گا۔ بہرکیف ارشاد فرمایا گیا کہ اِعلانِ حق کے پہنچ جانے اور اس کے دیکھ لینے کے بعد ایمان لانے اور نصیحت قبول کرنے کا موقع کہاں باقی رہے گا۔ بالخصوص جبکہ انکے پاس اِتمامِ حجت کیلئے اللہ تعالیٰ کی طرف سے ایک ایسا عظیم الشان رسول بھی پہنچ گیا جس نے انکے سامنے حق کو پوری طرح واضح کرکے اور نکھار کر بیان کر دیا تھا۔ لیکن انہوں نے اس کی بات کو مان کر نہ دیا سو ایمان لانے کا وہ موقع جب گزر گیا تو...
This study aims to compare the learning outcomes of physics taught using face-to-face learning models with online learning models at Islamic Senior High School 2 Palu City in the academic year of 2021/2022. In this study, the X1 variable consists of the face-to-face model, the X2 variable is the online learning model, and the Y variable consists of the results of learning Physics. This study used quantitative research with comparative analysis techniques. The subject of the research was students of X IPA 1 at Islamic Senior High School 2 Palu, which is totaling 25 students. Data collection was carried out using student learning outcomes tests, observation, and documentation. The method used for the analysis of hypothesis testing is the paired sample t-test. Descriptive, normality, and homogeneity tests were used for data analysis. The results showed that there were significant differences in the learning outcomes of Physics subjects between face-to-face learning and the online learning model for class X IPA1 Islamic Senior High School 2 Palu in the academic year of 2021/2022. The results of the descriptive analysis calculation show that there is a difference between the Physics Learning Outcomes Taught Using the Face-to-Face Learning Model and the Online Learning Model in class X IPA1 in the academic year 2021/2022. This shows that the face-to-face learning model is more effective than the online learning model in physics subjects.
This thesis is a critical exploration of traditional management education discourse. It advocates imparting transformative business education leading to ‘whole person’ learning of business students. Traditional management education needs transformation because it is in crisis. The prestigious management education journal Academy of Management Learning & Education is leading a wave of scathing criticism on different aspects of business school education for the last decade or so. The most critiqued of these aspects include inability of traditional business school education to prepare students to face real world complexities. This is attributed to management education pedagogy’s over-reliance on science and rationality leading to short term profit focus and its being oblivious to larger issues of society, context, values and history. A majority of previous research involves application of Mezirow’s transformative learning theory in non-management settings. This thesis combines Mezirow’s cognitive perspective of transformation with later developments including extra-rational thinking, multiple ways of knowing and the ability to critically evaluate social and organizational dynamics to presents the concept of ‘wholistic management education’ (WME). Based on contemporary scholarly critique on management education, UNESCO Curricular Reforms Manifesto (2011), Principles of Responsible Management Education (PRME) (2011) and guidelines of Higher Education Commission (HEC) of Pakistan (2012) the thesis constructs five ‘missing’ discourses of management education. These discourses serve as foundations for developing WME model of the thesis. This model not only captures the micro level discursive interplay between business school texts and actions but also connects it with the macro discourse’s proximal and distal structures like organizations, society and environment. From WME discourse construction the thesis turns to critical analysis of traditional management education discourse by incorporating extra-linguistic factors such as power relations, dominance, history, ideology and hegemony inherent in it. The five main discourses are constructed on the basis of carefully and systematically selected management education and transformative learning literature. The main proponents of different perspectives of transformative learning are identified on the basis of number of well received books authored/edited (the cut-off point is at least 4 well received books) and their publications in IF Journals. For selecting literature of management education it is ensured to include the main writers highlighting different gaps in management education over the last 15 years. Academy of Management Learning & Education is the main source for selecting frequently cited articles on management education critique. More than 100 such articles were short listed for abstract reviews. Those found relevant with research objectives and questions of this thesis were reviewed thoroughly. Some of the books mentioned in the References of the selected articles were shortlisted and their Introductions and Prefaces were read. Those resonating with the research aims of the thesis were given detailed reading. The same criterion of identifying influential authors is employed as in the case of transformative learning literature. The thesis creates nuance in transformative learning and management education research by positing them as discourses and also through the application of critical discourse analysis on business education. The construction of WME discourse and critical analysis of traditional management education discourse reveal that history of Western civilization has a reflexive relation with history of management education which in turn has shaped the overall discourse of business education. Similarly Civilizational values have played an important role in shaping different historic-philosophical epochs of Western civilization which have influenced the development of cultural and organizational values manifesting as organizing practices institutionalizing and reinforcing the legitimacy of management education texts. The strong reflexive relation of management education with this ‘value hierarchy’ creates the notion of ‘universalism’ through which traditional business education implicitly suppresses local non-Western contexts and epistemologies. The micro-micro and micro-macro intertextuality-based discourse relations emerging through applying the proposed WME model are shown to counter this suppression and to encourage developing whole person learning in business students enabling them to face the ambiguities and complexities of their respective real worlds. The thesis not only pioneers the application of extra-linguistic critical discourse analysis techniques on management education but also advances transformative learning theory towards a more unified, contextualized and wholistic perspective. The major scholarly value of this thesis is production of a contextualized ‘counter-discourse’ to the universal traditional management education discourse.