TO COMPARE THE EFFECTIVENESS OF TRUNK STABILIZATION EXERCISE AND GENERAL EXERCISE IN NON-SPECIFIC CHRONIC LOW BACK PAIN-A COMPARATIVE STUDY

Aim of study: To identify the effectiveness of particular trunk stabilization versus a general exercise in low back pain management. Methodology: An experimental study was conducted at the physiotherapy department of Dow University of Health Sciences, 52 participants with low backache were enrolled and assessed for pain intensity using Visual Analog Scale (VAS) and disability by using the Modified Oswestry Low Back Disability Index (MOLBDQ-I). Through equal randomization one group got their low back pain treated through trunk stabilization exercises while the other with general exercises, 3times/week* 4weeks. Data were analyzed using SPSS version 25.0 by applying non-parametric Mann-Whitney U-test. Results: This study demonstrated that males and females are equally affected by chronic low back pain. Trunk stabilizing and general exercise regimes both significantly reduced the pain and disability in the study population but the effectiveness of trunk stabilizing exercises were significantly superior in reducing pain. Limitations and Future Implications: Study did not include a control group that received no intervention. It would be valuable to assess the cost-effectiveness of trunk stabilization exercises compared to general exercises or other interventions. Originality: Trunk stabilizing exercises are superior in reducing pain, disability, and restoring functional mobility than general exercises in chronic back pain. Conclusion: Trunk stabilizing exercises are superior in reducing pain, disability, and restoring functional mobility than general exercises in chronic back pain.

The Effect of a Preanaesthesia Clinic Consultation on Adult Patient Anxiety in Aga Khan University Hospital; a Cohort Study

Background: Preoperative anxiety is a common perioperative complication, according to studies done it is seen in approximately 11-80% of adults undergoing surgery. Various pharmacological and non pharmacological techniques have been used to reduce preop anxiety. One of the goals of the preanaesthesia clinic is to allay anxiety. Literature shows that a preanaesthesia clinic evaluation reduces anxiety however b current studies done on anxiety and the preanaesthesia clinic have not quantified this reduction. Objective: To determine the reduction in anxiety in patients evaluated in the clinic versus those evaluated in the ward. Study Design: A cohort and before – after study Setting: The surgical outpatient clinics, the gynaecological outpatient clinic, the antenatal clinic, the wards and operating theatres at the Aga Khan University Hospital, Nairobi. Population: All the adult patients scheduled for non-cardiac elective surgical procedures during the study period. Sample size: 44 adult patients with 22 patients in each of the 2 groups i.e. anaesthesia clinic (AC) group and the ward group (W). Methods: 51 adult patients with 28 patients in anaesthesia clinic group and another 23 in the ward were sequentially recruited from both the surgical outpatient clinic, gynaecology outpatient clinic and antenatal clinic. The patient’s State Trait Anxiety Index (STAI) was taken once the patient was booked for theatre. The patient then had a preanaesthesia evaluation either in the preanaesthesia outpatient clinic (PAC) or in the wards. Another STAI score was taken in the preoperative area in theatre on the day of surgery. The patients were then traced back as to whether they had their intervention in the ward or the clinic and hence divided into two groups. The difference in the change of STAI scores in both groups was then analysed. Results: 51 adult patients were recruited i.e. 28 in the clinic group and 23 in the ward group. The majority of the recruited patients were female (n=38). Statistically significant difference was seen in the reduction of the anxiety scores between the clinic group 2.143(C.I=1.384-2.902) and ward group 0.739(C.I=0.168-1.311) with a p value=0.0051.There was also significant difference in reduction in anxiety scores within ward group in the patients with no prior anaesthetic experience having a greater reduction than those a prior anaesthetic experience. There were no other significant differences between the 2 groups. Conclusion: Patients evaluated in the anaesthesia clinic had a greater reduction in their anxiety but it was not as much as hypothesised which may