The low recovery of soil phosphorus (P) associated with poor soil characteristics could be corrected through its foliar application if administered at proper growth stage with suitable concentration strength and appropriate phosphorus source. For this purpose a series of hydroponic, pot and field studies were conducted at The University of Agriculture, Peshawar to optimize foliar solution strength and its role on maize and wheat yield and phosphorus use efficiency (PUE) when applied at different growth stages and soil phosphorus levels. The hydroponic study was conducted in phosphorus-excluded Hoagland solution to evaluate plant phosphorus absorption from different foliar KH2PO4 solutions whereas the pot study was conducted to optimize foliar phosphorus levels in conjunction with various soil applied phosphorus levels. The 1st field trial consisted of “investigating the optimum growth stage of maize and wheat and number of sprays for foliar phosphorus application” while the 2nd field experiment was conducted on “supplementing effect of foliar phosphorus application in enhancing maize and wheat yields with saving fertilizer under calcareous soils” during 2013-14. The hydroponic study was conducted by spraying three foliar sprays of 0, 18, 36, 72, 144 and 216 mM KH2PO4 solution with 5 d intervals on 3 week old transplanted wheat plants cv Atta Habib into phosphorus-excluded Hoagland solutions. In pot study three sprays of 0, 45, 90 and 135 mM KH2PO4 solution were sprayed at 5 days interval on 20 days old maize and wheat plants grown at 0, 10 and 20 mg P kg-1 soil. In both cases the treatments were arranged in completely randomized design (CRD) with three replications and data on plant biomass, height, shoot and root [P] and PUE were recorded. Based on hydroponic study results, 144 mM KH2PO4 were sprayed at different growth stages of maize and wheat to optimize their suitable growth stages for foliar phosphorus in 1st field trial. In maize crop spray was given at four leaf, knee height, tasling and silking stages whereas in wheat it was performed at tillering, stem elongation, boot and anthesis stages as one, two and three sprays in both crops at given stages. In 2nd field trial, the maize and wheat were supplied with 0, 20, 40, and 60 kg P ha-1 as DAP applied either as broadcast or banding at time of sowing were sprayed with 144 mM KH2PO4 solution at knee height + tasling in maize and stem elongation + boot stages in wheat. In both field trials, the experiments were arranged in randomized complete block design (RCBD) with four replications and maize cv Jalal and wheat cv Atta Habib were the test varieties. Data on plant height, grains ear-1, grains spike-1, 1000-grain weight, grain and biological yields were recorded for both crops along with postharvest plant and soil NPK. Results of hydroponic study showed that foliar phosphorus application as KH2PO4 solution increased plant height, biomass and phosphorus uptake of 45 days old wheat plants grown in phosphorus-excluded iii Hoagland solution revealing the effective absorption of phosphorus from solution, its assimilation and translocation to other parts of the plant. No detrimental effect of over phosphorus concentrations from 0 to 216 mM was observed, however, the maximum plant growth or phosphorus uptake was recorded with increase in phosphorus solution up to 144 mM KH2PO4. The pot study, similarly, showed increase in maize and wheat growth and phosphorus uptake with foliar application of KH2PO4 at all levels of soil applied phosphorus. The response to foliar phosphorus increased with strength of KH2PO4 solution but decreased with soil applied phosphorus indicating more promising effect in soil phosphorus deficient conditions. The leaf [P] and PUE also improved with foliar phosphorus and increased with its concentration but at diminishing rate with soil phosphorus doses. Again no detrimental effect at any level of applied KH2PO4 was observed. The 1st field trial showed significant increases in maize and wheat yields, phosphorus uptake and use efficiency with 144 mM KH2PO4 foliar solution but the extent of response varied with growth stage and number of total sprays administered to crops. Knee height and tasling stage in maize and stem elongation and boot stage in wheat were observed to be highly responsive. Application of multiple sprays at different growth stages further increased the growth and yields but the combination of tasling in maize and stem elongation in wheat with other growth stages seemed to have more promising effect. The leaf phosphorus in both maize and wheat at the given stages was higher with number of sprays received but at maturity the higher phosphorus was observed when the spray was administered at knee height or tasling in maize and stem elongation or boot stage in wheat. The higher response at these critical stages could be associated with increasing demands of plant for P with rapid vegetative growth which were partially fulfilled by foliar sprays. It can be concluded that application of 144 mM KH2PO4 at given maize and wheat growth stages as a single or two sprays effectively enhanced crop yields and phosphorus use efficiency in the prevailing soil and climatic condition. In 2nd field trial significant increases in maize and wheat growth, yields and PUE were also observed through foliar application of 144 mM KH2PO4 solution sprayed at knee height + tasling in maize and stem elongation + boot stage in wheat. The growth and yields of both crops at lower soil phosphorus with foliar phosphorus was statistically at par or even better than respective next higher soil phosphorus levels suggesting decrease in soil applied phosphorus demand with foliar application. The overall results based on crop yield performance followed a pattern at each soil phosphorus level in order of banding + foliar phosphorus > broadcast + foliar phosphorus > banding > broadcast for almost all parameters indicating that lower recovery of phosphorus associated with broadcast could be corrected with foliar phosphorus as performance of broadcast + foliar phosphorus was better than banding + no foliar phosphorus. Tissue NPK concentrations improved with foliar KH2PO4 solution while post-harvest soil NPK content enhanced with soil applied P level coupled with foliar applied P. The results conclude that application of 144 mM KH2PO4 at knee height + tasling in maize and stem elongation + boot stage in wheat with 40 kg soil P ha-1 should be adopted for enhanced maize and wheat yields under calcareous soil conditions of the area. Keeping the promising effect of foliar phosphorus application, such studies should be conducted for other crops and locations for more widespread assessment, recommendations and adoption of technology.
پروفیسر سید حسن مرحوم افسوس کہ ۱۸؍ نومبر ۸۸ء کی صبح ۳۰:۸ بجے اردو اور فارسی کے نامور معلم محقق جناب پروفیسر سید حسن کا پٹنہ میڈیکل کالج میں انتقال ہوگیا، اناﷲ وانا الیہ راجعون۔ چند دنوں پہلے ان پر فالج کا حملہ ہوا تھا، انتقال کے وقت ان کی عمر تقریباً ۷۸ برس کی تھی۔ وہ ۱۹۱۱ء میں اپنے نانہالی گاؤں شیخ پورہ ضلع مونگیر میں پیدا ہوئے، اسی ضلع کا الہرہ گاؤں ان کا آبائی وطن تھا، یہاں کے سادات کا تعلق حضرت سید احمد جاجنیریؒ سے ہے، پروفیسر سید حسن کا خاندان بھی جاجنیری تھا، والدہ کا سلسلہ نسب حضرت مخدوم شیخ شعیبؒ برادر عم زاد حضرت شیخ شرف الدینؒ احمد یحییٰ منیری سے ملتا ہے، جب وہ ۷؍۸ سال کے تھے تو ان کے والد کا انتقال ہوگیا، لیکن ماں کی شفقت و تربیت نے یتیمی اور محرومی کا احساس نہ ہونے دیا اور نامساعد حالات کے باوجود وہ تعلیمی مراحل طے کرتے رہے اور مڈل، میڑک، انٹر اور پھر گریجویشن کے سارے امتحانات میں اول آئے، ۳۵ء میں اردو میں ۳۷ء میں فارسی میں ایم اے کیا، ۳۶ء میں انھوں نے ایجوکیشن میں ڈپلوما بھی لیا، بعد میں ۱۹۰۶ء میں انھوں نے دانش گاہ تہران ایران سے فارسی جدید، زبان پہلوی اور فارسی قدیم میں ڈپلوما حاصل کیا، طہران میں ڈاکٹر نذیر احمد اور پروفیسر سید امیر حسن عابدی وغیرہ بھی ان کے ساتھ تھے۔تعلیم ختم ہونے کے بعد ان کے مشغلہ تدریس کا آغاز ہوا، ۳۷ء میں بہار نیشنل کالج میں وہ فارسی اردو کے لکچرر مقرر ہوئے، ۷ سال کے بعد ۴۴ء میں پٹنہ کالج میں لکچرر مقرر ہوئے اور اسی کالج میں وہ ۵۰ء میں اسسٹنٹ پروفیسر اورچھ سال کے بعد ترقی کرکے ۶۱ء تک پروفیسر رہے، اسی عرصہ میں حکومت بہار نے عربی و فارسی میں مطالعہ و...
Shaikh Ahmed Sirhindi, known as Mujaddid Alf Sani (R.A) was not only a well-known Muslim mystic but also a great reformer. He brought reformative changes in political system of subcontinent and introduced social set up of Islamic society, spiritual patterns of Islamic mystics and religious scholars of Islamic sciences. His services regarding the revival of Islam and purification of Islamic beliefs are versatile and multidimensional. Mughal emperor Akbar tried to reconcile the differences of both religions, and introduced a new faith called the Din-i-Ilahi, which incorporated both Islam and Hinduism which stressed the Muslim community a lot. This article is a study of the role of Shaikh Ahmad Sirhandi in purification believes. Main tiopics of this study are oneness of Ram and Raheem, wahdat-ul-wajood and wahdat-ul-Shahood, finality, eternality, sustainability and universality of Prophethood, Meraj-ul-Nabi, Aqeeda Tanasukh and Aqeeda Halool with reference to the life hereinafter. Article also mentions the methodology of this pious personality in purification of believers and its utility in contemporary period. This ends with findings of the research paper and no doubt it provides important guidance for researchers of Islam to face the challenges for the betterment of Muslim Ummah.
Administration is the backbone of any institute, which not only utilizes the human and material resources in the best possible way but also gives direction for the achievement of its goals and objectives. This study aimed to compare the administrative practices of public and private sector universities of Pakistan. The administrative practices consisted of amendments in university statutes; university governing bodies; its members selection; tenure; meetings; decision making practice; and implementation of decisions; recruitment/selection/appointment and promotion of official and faculty; provision of facilities to faculty; administrative, financial and academic matters; establishment of new departments; allocation of funds; university timings suitability; scholarships; evaluation of the employees; Procedure for overcoming irregularities; university management; dealing of university with community, HEC; Government, and other universities; HEC influence in university affairs; students admission; affiliation to colleges; and the like. The population of the study consisted of all administrators and academicians in the universities of Punjab and KPK provinces of Pakistan. Eight universities, four each from Punjab and Khyber Pakhtoon-khwa (two public and two private of each provinces) were randomly selected as sample of the study. Questionnaire for Administrative Practices (QAP), consisted of 32 domains, was utilized for data elicitation. Cronbach’s alpha coefficient was used to measure the reliability of QAP, resulting in 0.963. Data was analyzed through the utilization of Mean score and t-test. Significant difference was observed between public and private sector universities regarding the administrative practices i.e. amendments in the statutes; universities bodies tenure; the provision of facilities to staff; officials attitude for handling of ixacademic matters; official’s way of supervising their subordinates; student admission; university timings suitability; process of college affiliation; evaluation of employees; procedure for overcoming irregularities; meeting with authorities; university management. While insignificance difference was found for universities bodies members selection; student representation in university bodies; their meetings; decision making; decision implementation; official appointment; staff promotion; administrative and financial matters; relations with community; HEC; Government and other universities; HEC influence in administration and other matters; scholarships; fund allocation; process to visit authorities and establishment of new departments. Significant difference was found between the opinions of academicians of public and private sector universities in terms of amendments in statutes; bodies decision making; staff selection; financial matters; academic matters; HEC influence in administration; student admission; university timings; meeting with authorities, and university management. Significant difference was observed between the opinions of administrators of public and private sector universities in terms of universities bodies’ tenure; bodies’ decision implementation; provision of facilities to staff; administrative matters; academic matters; official supervision; relations with other universities; HEC influence; fund allocation; university timings; College affiliation; procedure for overcoming irregularities; and university management. It was concluded from the findings that both public and private sectors are performing numerous practices in different ways and means. The university stakeholders’ administrators and academicians have lack of coordination. xIt is recommended that the coordination body HEC may arrange workshops, seminars for both public and private sectors universities. In the universities a body may be established which strives for the coordination between administrators and academicians.