لگدا اے سکھ پریڑے ہو گئے
دکھ ہن چار چوفیرے ہو گئے
نہیں پرندے لہندے گھر وچ
اُچے ڈھیر بنیرے ہو گئے
بُھج کلیجہ زخمی ہویا
سیکھاں اتے بیرے ہو گئے
وچ درگاہ دے رتبے پاندے
عاجز ڈھیر نویرے ہو گئے
جتھے حسن بہاراں آئیاں
اوتھے عشق دے ڈیرے ہو گئے
جنھاں وفا نہ میں نال کیتی
سکے کیویں اوہ تیرے ہو گئے
غم دی رات ہجر دی لمی
اتوں گھپ ہنیرے ہو گئے
کیویں ختم غلامی منّاں
جدوں غلام پتھیرے ہو گئے
رُکھ تاں سارے کٹ دتے نیں
پکھواں کتھ بسیرے ہو گئے
سجناں رات غماں دی گھلی
قسمت نال سویرے ہو گئے
میں باغی ہاں اس مسکن دا
منصف جتھ وڈیرے ہو گئے
واہی ہجر دی برہوں فصلاں
اتوں غم دے کیرے ہو گئے
دکھاں دی پنڈ چاون والے
ساتھی کئی ہن میرے ہو گئے
We can divide human beings into two categories: Leaders and Followers. Leaders are a few, the rest of the overwhelming majority of the human beings are followers. They show an earnest tendency of following or obligingness towards their leaders. This capacity of the following is exploited and abused by the egoist and toxic leaders to bring destruction to their followers and the world. The author of the paper tries to explore and determine the motives of obligingness or complaisance of blind following. The author studies this phenomenon in the light of theories of the hierarchy of needs by Abraham Maslow, The Situational Factor by Philip Zimbardo, the Function of Labeling by Albert Bandura and Ego Depletion by Michael Cholbi. These theories have earned good acceptance from the experts. The theories are found helpful to understand the mentality of leaders and their followers as described by the Qur’ān. These theories are applied to some selected cases from the Qur’ān to reach a better understanding of the phenomenon. The Qur’ān at many places describes and discusses this human tendency. It presents dialogue between the leaders and their blind followers in the life hereafter, the person of Pharaoh, his maneuvering, his courtiers, the common people of Egypt, the followers of pagan chieftains and their opposition to the prophets give us ample description to know how blind following actually works under the influence of leadership. The author hopes that this study helps understand the mentality of the present day leaders and their blind or complaisant followers.
Pakistan is a land of linguistic diversity having more than sixty languages. Punjabi, along with its numerous mutually intelligible dialects, is an ancient language. It is mainly spoken in the Pakistani province of Punjab and Indian Punjab in the subcontinent. It is a member of the Indo-Aryan branch of the Indo-European language family. The aim of this ethnographic study is to explore the status of Punjabi language in our society by looking at the language usage and linguistic practices of Punjabi native speakers residing in selected urban and rural areas. Ten families, five from urban area and five from rural area, participated in the study. The participants were selected on the basis of their educational level, marital status, monthly income, occupation, family background and the size of land owned by them. The theoretical framework which informs this research is the constructivist qualitative paradigm. The tools of data collection include semi structured interviews and recordings of informal conversation of the research participants. The analysis of the collected data reveals that in the urban areas, Punjabi language is not the dominant medium of communication among the research participants. The participants do not consider it important and worthwhile to maintain Punjabi language, as they do not see it as economically advantageous and profitable to them. It is just a part of their cultural heritage, but they do not use it for communicative purposes. In the rural areas, however, the research participants expressed a strong sense of association and affiliation with Punjabi language; Punjabi language is their dominant medium of communication with others; they consider Punjabi an inevitable part of their cultural heritage and identity; they support the idea of learning English and Urdu languages but not at the cost of Punjabi language. These findings suggest that language desertion is an urban phenomenon, as Punjabi language is not maintained by the urban research participants due to certain wider socio-political factors which have disrupted and distorted the status of Punjabi language while consolidating the role of English and Urdu in the society.