Home > Parenting Practices and Behavioral Problems Among Adolescents Having Parents With Psychopathology: Adolescentss Coping and Effortful Control As Moderators
Parenting Practices and Behavioral Problems Among Adolescents Having Parents With Psychopathology: Adolescentss Coping and Effortful Control As Moderators
Mental disorders studied in offspring research typically show familial aggregation of psychiatric and psychological problems. A large body of research suggests that symptoms of mental illness in parents become reflected in family and parent–child interactions, affecting the nature and quality of caregiving and, in turn, both shortand long-term child outcomes (Beardslee, Gladstone & O’Conner, 2011; Downey & Coyne, 1990; Goodman & Gotlib, 1999, 2002). There is reason to believe that these parenting processes are part of a larger set of factors that contribute to patterns of intergenerational transmission of problems (Zahn-Waxler, Duggal & Gruber, 2002). Despite the tremendous work on parent–child interactions and emotional behavioral outcomes in children of parents with psychopathology in Western countries, there was an extreme scarcity in Pakistan for empirical support for this area of research. The present research aims to examine differences in parenting practices and behavioral problems among adolescents having parents with psychopathology (Major Depressive Disorder & Schizophrenia) and without psychopathology. It also investigated the association between parenting practices and behavioral problems among adolescents having parents with psychopathology. Moreover, it attempts to explore moderating role of adolescents’ coping and effortful control on the relationship between parenting practices and behavioral problems among adolescents having parents with psychopathology. The present research was conducted in two phases. The phase-I aimed at establishing psychometric properties of measures used in the present study. The findings of the pilot study indicated that all the Urdu translated scales of the present study supported the evidence of reliability and suggested appropriateness and relevance of these measures for Pakistani culture. Phase-II aimed to test the hypotheses of present research. Sample of the main study consisted of 348 parents and their adolescent children divided into two groups (Clinical Group i.e., Parents with Psychopathology =173, Control Group i.e., Parents without Psychopathology =175). The clinical group was selected from different psychiatric departments and clinics from the twin cities of Rawalpindi and Islamabad. Urdu translated version of Alabama Parenting Questionnaire (APQ) for both parent and adolescent reported parenting practices, Youth Self Report (YSR) for adolescent reported behavioral problems, Brief COPE to assess adolescent reported coping strategies and Effortful Control subscale of Early Adolescent Temperament Questionnaire-Revised Short Version (EATQ-R) to assess effortful control were used for information collection. Results of present research indicated that parents with psychopathology reported less positive involvement/parenting and more negative/ineffective discipline and deficient monitoring. The adolescents having parents with psychopathology also reported elevated levels of behavioral problems (internalizing and externalizing problems) as compared to adolescents having parents without psychopathology. The findings also indicated that positive involvement/parenting was significantly negatively associated with internalizing and externalizing problems whereas negative/ineffective discipline and deficient monitoring were significantly positively associated with externalizing problems. The findings further suggested significant positive association between deficient monitoring and internalizing problems. However, the findings of the present research could not suggest significant association between negative/ineffective discipline and internalizing problems. The main effect of coping strategies and effortful control on behavioral problems among adolescents indicated significant association in the expected direction. The results of moderation analyses revealed that problem-focused coping, positive coping, and effortful control mitigated the potential impact of negative parenting practices (i.e. negative/ineffective discipline and deficient monitoring) on externalizing problems whereas denial exacerbated this relationship. The results further indicated that problem-focused coping, religious coping, denial and effortful control also moderated the relationship between positive/involvement parenting and externalizing problems. However, interactive effect of avoidant coping on the relationship between any aspect of parenting practices and behavioral problems among adolescents was not supported in the present study. Furthermore, the moderating role of coping strategies and effortful control on the relationship between parenting practices and internalizing problems was not found. It is concluded that problem-focused coping, positive coping, religious coping and effortful control have served as important moderators between parenting practices and externalizing problems. Despite its limitations, the results of this study are promising and significantly contribute to the existing literature. The implications are discussed for the implementation of effective preventive interventions with at risk families and children.
Islam and the West are two competitor civilizations of 21st century. West is much fear by the rapid expansion of Islam. It is imagined that very soon Islam is going to become a major religion of the Europe. Now European think tanks are constantly working to present a negative picture of Islam. Bernard Lewis is trying his best to prove that Islam is not a suitable civilization and religion for the world. As there are different classes of citizens within Islamic State and society and all the citizens are not equal in Islamic teachings and practice like women, slaves and Non-Muslims. Whereas, his presented theories are quite different than real teachings and practice of Islam. All the citizens of Islamic State are equal before law but there is difference of responsibilities according to their abilities. This article is presenting a critical and real discussion about the social inequalities blamed by Bernard Lewis, existing in Islamic state and society.
The present study conducted in two phases attempted to evaluate fertilizer grade Single super phosphate (SSP) vis-à-vis Di-calcium phosphate (DCP) in terms of their effect on production and health in dairy cows and buffaloes. Phase I entailed comparative evaluation of SSP and DCP in buffaloes and cows for their effects on health and production. It was conducted for one complete lactation on buffaloes and sahiwal cows (n=150) to evaluate in comparative terms the effect of feeding SSP and DCP on health, production and reproduction. For this purpose, animals were randomly divided into two treatment (DCP and super juice prepared from SSP) and one control group. Responses to the two treatments were examined on the basis of milk yield, weight gain and reproductive performance. Benefit-cost analysis of P supplementation from SSP or DCP (calculated on monthly additional milk yield basis only) in cows indicated that phosphorus supplementation from SSP was far more cost beneficial (benefit-cost ratio = 19.2: 1) than phosphorus supplementation from DCP (benefit-cost ratio = 1.2:1). In the case of buffalo, SSP and DCP respectively had a benefit-cost ratio of 26:1 and 2.83:1. Benefit-cost analysis of P supplementation from SSP and DCP also indicated that the P supplementation from either SSP or DCP was more cost effective in buffalo than in cow. In SSP supplemented cows and buffaloes, serum P levels (5.84 ± 0.13 mg/dl) were higher than those of cows and buffaloes treated with DCP (5.18 ± 0.10 mg/dl). The values of liver enzymes specific in bovine species viz: sorbitol dehydrogenase (SDH), glutamyl transferase (GGT), and aspartate aminotransferase (AST) recorded in DCP and SSP treated animals were comparable to those in control group of animals indicating that both SSP and DCP did not exert any liver toxicity. Fecal excretion of P in the DCP (119.46±4.42) treated animals (cows and buffaloes) was significantly higher than in the control (77.00±1.88) and SSP (108.71±5.36) treated groups. Non-significant (P>0.05) differences in RBC, WBC, PCV and Hb values were recorded between treatments (control, SSP, DCP). Pregnancy rate in control, DCP and SSP treated groups, respectively was 42, 60, and 74% over the duration of the trial. Mean number of services per conception in control, DCP and SSP treated buffaloes was 2.1, 1.96, and 1.92, respectively. The corresponding mean number of services per conception for cows was 2.3, 2.1, and 2.1, respectively. Phase II of the study dealt with evaluation of comparative therapeutic efficacy of SSP and DCP in the treatment of such P associated disorders as parturient hemoglobinuria, osteomalacia-like disease, pica, anestrus and repeat breeding. DCP or SSP were used as adjunct therapeutic agents in the treatment of these P associated clinical disorders. The responses in terms of clearance of clinical signs and serum mineral profiles with SSP for these five diseases were broadly comparable to the responses obtained by treatment with DCP. In conclusion, integration of the findings of phase I and phase II of the present study would tempt one to tentatively conclude that super juice prepared from SSP can be used as a cheaper alternative to DCP in dairy production as well as to treat important P associated disorders of cows and buffaloes.