اردو میں ہائیکو کا آغاز و ارتقا
محمد حسنین عسکری
وقت کے ساتھ ساتھ ادب میں بھی تبدیلیاں رونما ہوتی رہتی ہیں۔ کسی بھی ترقی یافتہ زبان کی علامات میں سے اہم ترین علامت یہ ہوتی ہے کہ اس میں نئے الفاظ وجود پاتے ہیں اور پرانے الفاظ وقت کے ساتھ ساتھ متروک ہوتے جاتے ہیں۔ اگر دیکھا جائے تو بہت سی ایسی زبانیں آج ناپید ہو چکی ہیں جو کسی زمانے میں خاص اہمیت و فوقیت رکھتی تھیں۔ تاریحِ السنہ کے مطابق عبرانی دنیا کی سب سے قدیم زبان ہے مگر آج وہ تقریبا ًناپید ہو چکی ہے۔ اسی طرح سنسکرت کا ایک وقت میں ہندوستان پر عروج رہا مگر آج وہ بھی تقریبا ًختم ہو چکی ہے۔ اردو زبان نے نہایت سرعت سے ترقی کی اورکم وقت میں دنیا کی ترقی یافتہ زبانوں کی صف میں شامل ہو گئی۔ اردو شاعری ہو یا نثر دونوں کی اصناف پر خاطر خواہ کام ہو چکا ہے ۔لا تعداد تحقیقی موضوعات سامنے آچکے ہیں تنقید ہو یا تحقیق ،تخلیق ہو یا لسانیات ،اردو زبان کا دامن ہر ایک سے لبریز ہے۔
نثر کے ساتھ ساتھ اردو شاعری کی تمام اصناف بھی تحقیقی میدان میں زیر موضوع رہیں۔ ان میں مختلف زبانوں کی اصناف کو بھی شامل کیا گیا مثلا سانیٹ اور ہائیکو وغیرہ۔ ان اصناف سے اس زبان کی وسعت اضافہ ہوا۔ البتہ شاعری کی کچھ اصناف ابھی تک ایسی موجود ہیں جن میں تحقیق کی ضرورت ہے ان میں ایک صنف ہائیکو ہے یہ دراصل جاپانی صنف ہے جو کہ اردو زبان میں وارد ہوئی۔
ہائیکو کا آغاز آٹھویں صدی عیسوی میں ہوا(1)۔
اگر دیکھا جائے تو قران کریم کی "سورۃالکوثر "ہائیکو کی بہترین مثال پیش کرتی ہے
آغاز میں اسے مختلف ناموں سے پکارا جاتا رہا مثلا چوکا، واکا، تنکا، اورینگا (2)وغیرہ
واکا ہائیکو کی سب...
This study deals with a historical overview of the entry of Islam to the Indian subcontinent and the contribution of the companions, successor, and their followers in spreading the Prophetic Sunnah in it. Moreover, It contains a brief historical overview of the emergence of hadīth science، its weakness, renaissance, development, and flourishing, and a study of the attention of Muhaddithūn to the Sahih al-Bukhārī by writing its Shuruh, Taliqāt، Hawāshī, and Tarājim in the Indian subcontinent. It has been proven from the study of the history of hadīth science that after the entry of the Ghaznavids and the Ghurids to this region, the science of hadīth weakened due to the interest of the locals in rational sciences until Sultān Ala’ud-Dīn al-Khiljī (d. 716/1316) period. The scholars began to pay attention to the compilations of hadīth in general and Sahih al-Bukhārī in particular, and the first Sharh of Sahih al-Bukhārī appeared by Sheikh al-Hassan b. Muhammad al-Saghānī al-Lāhourī (d. 1252/650). It was revealed from a historical study of Sahih al-Bukhārī’s related studies in the Indian subcontinent that all were written in three stages. The first stage was the era of the renaissance of hadīth science and the emergence of Sahih al-Bukhari’s Shuruh and Hawāshī in the Arabic language. The second stage was the era of the development of hadīth sciences and the emergence of Sahih al-Bukhari’s Shuruh and Tarājim in the Arabic and Persian languages. Besides, the study proved that it was the era of translation and authorship in the Persian language, which was one of the most widespread languages، understanding, and delivered in the scientific community of the Indian subcontinent. As for the third stage, it is the flourishing of hadīth science and the emergence of a diversity of books about the Sahih al-Bukhārī in Arabic, Urdu, and Pashto. It was discovered from the study that the Urdu language took the place of Persian in the dissemination of legal sciences and the authorship of Sahih al-Bukhārī.
Among pulses, pea is an important legume crop which is not only the major source of proteins but also provide significant amount of carbohydrates, minerals and vitamin B complex. The current research work was planned to study genetic diversity among available pea germplasm and to evaluate inheritance pattern controlling seed yield related traits in Pisum sativum L. For this purpose 99 pea genotypes were field evaluated following RCBD replicated thrice. Data were taken for seed yield and its related traits. All the studied parameters showed significant amount of variation among genotypes. The cluster analysis classified 99 pea accessions into three clusters on the basis of genetic diversity of seed yield and its related traits. Eight accessions namely 19605, 20202, 26710, 20300, 19716, 20126, 26701 and 20153 were selected from cluster I and III for hybridization. Selected genotypes were crossed in 8×8 half diallel fashion excluding reciprocals to study the inheritance patterns for yield and quality traits. Twenty eight F1 crosses and parents were field evaluated during winter season 2015-2016 while F2 of all crosses was evaluated during winter season 2016-2017. Analysis of variance displayed significant amount of variation for all the studied parameters in both generations. The accession 20126 was good general combiner for number of branches per plant, biological yield, carotenoids contents and seed yield per plant in F1 generation while the accession 20153 was good general combiner for pod length, hundred fresh seed weight, hundred dry seed weight, harvest index and seed yield per plant in F2 generation. The cross combination 20202 × 26710 was good combination for pod length, pod width and seed yield per plant in F1 generation while the cross combination 19605 × 20202 was found best combination for seed yield per plant in F2 generation due to maximum significant and positive specific combining ability effects for seed yield per plant. The cross combination 20202 × 26710 showed maximum mid parent as well as better parent heterotic effects for pod length and seed yield per plant in F1 generation. The correlation analysis in F2 generation showed that number of branches per plant, pod length, biological yield and harvest index was significantly and positively correlated with seed yield per plant in Pisum sativum L. The cross combination 20202 × 26710 may be used as hybrid due to its higher specific combining ability variance and heterotic effects for seed yield per plant. Presence of non additive effects advocated the importance of heterosis breeding for development of high yielding varieties in pea.