Search or add a thesis

Advanced Search (Beta)
Home > Iron Deficiency Anemia and its Consequences on the Mf, Ntal Health of Child Bearing Age Women and Their Children in a Country Like Pakistan

Iron Deficiency Anemia and its Consequences on the Mf, Ntal Health of Child Bearing Age Women and Their Children in a Country Like Pakistan

Thesis Info

Access Option

External Link

Author

Sufi, Bilal Aslam

Program

PhD

Institute

University of the Punjab

City

Lahore

Province

Punjab

Country

Pakistan

Thesis Completing Year

2011

Thesis Completion Status

Completed

Subject

Philosophy & psychology

Language

English

Link

http://prr.hec.gov.pk/jspui/bitstream/123456789/5806/1/5530H.PDF

Added

2021-02-17 19:49:13

Modified

2023-01-06 19:20:37

ARI ID

1676725315746

Similar


Loading...

Similar Thesis

Showing 1 to 20 of 100 entries
TitleAuthorSupervisorDegreeInstitute
PhD
University of the Punjab, Lahore, Pakistan
PhD
University of the Punjab, Lahore, Pakistan
MSc
Allama Iqbal Open University, Islamabad, Pakistan
Allama Iqbal Open University, Islamabad, Pakistan
Allama Iqbal Open University, Islamabad, Pakistan
Allama Iqbal Open University, Islamabad, Pakistan
Allama Iqbal Open University, Islamabad, Pakistan
Allama Iqbal Open University, Islamabad, Pakistan
PhD
Quaid-I-Azam University, Islamabad, Pakistan
PhD
University of Agriculture, Faisalabad, Pakistan
MSc
Allama Iqbal Open University, Islamabad, Pakistan
MSc
Allama Iqbal Open University, Islamabad, Pakistan
MMed
Aga Khan University, Karachi, Pakistan
MS
International Islamic University, Islamabad, Pakistan
Allama Iqbal Open University, Islamabad, Pakistan
MSc
Quaid-i-Azam University, Islamabad, Pakistan
PhD
The University of Lahore, Lahore, Pakistan
Allama Iqbal Open University, Islamabad, Pakistan
Allama Iqbal Open University, Islamabad, Pakistan
Mphil
Quaid-i-Azam University, Islamabad, Pakistan
TitleAuthorSupervisorDegreeInstitute
Showing 1 to 20 of 100 entries

Similar Books

Loading...

Similar Chapters

Loading...

Similar News

Loading...

Similar Articles

Loading...

Similar Article Headings

Loading...

کاغان وادی دیاں ویکھن یوگ تھاواں

کاغان وادی دیاں ویکھن یوگ تھاواں

                بالا کوٹ :

                بہت ای پر سکون تے خوبصورت تھاں بالا کوٹ سمندر توں 3226فٹ اچی تھاں اے ۔مانسہرہ توں ایس دا فاصلہ براستہ بڑاسی 50کلو میٹر تے براستہ جا بہ 40کلو میٹر اے ۔بالا کوٹ دے ارتھ اچے قلعے دے نیں ۔اے شہر اک اچے ٹبے اتے واقعہ اے ۔ایس لئی ایس نوں با لا کوٹ آ کھیا جا ندا نے ۔ایس شہر دے مشرق ولے بھنگیاں ناں دا پہاڑی سلسلہ موجود اے ۔مغرب ول مٹی کوٹ دے پہاڑ شمال ول سلسلہ کوہ دی دی اچی چوٹی ’’موسیٰ دا مصلیٰ ‘‘تے جنوب وچ گڑھی حبیب اﷲ توں بعد تحصیل ابیٹ آ باد موجود اے ۔کنہار دریا شمال توں جنوب ول کھپ پا ندا ،چھگ اڑاندا وگدا اے ۔ایس دے کنڈے اتے ہرے بھرے کھیت سیلانیاں دی کھچ دا کارن اے ۔ایس دے کنڈے سیلانیاں دے پرپھڑ لیندے نیں ۔ایس تھاں دا واتا ورن (آب و ہوا )بہت سوہنا اے جو مینہ پین سمے ہور سوہنا ہو جا ندا اے ۔

                ایس شہر نوں کا غان وادی دا بوھا(GATE WAY)وی آکھیا جا ندا اے ۔کاغان وادی دو پلاں راہیں ایس شہر نال ملی ہو ئی اے ۔ اک معلق پل (لٹکداپل )جس نوں 1895ء وچ بنا یا گیا تے دوجا اوہ پل جس اپروں ٹریفک لنگھ کے وادی وچ داخل ہو ندی اے ۔ایس پل نوں 1995ء بنا یا گیا تے ایس نوں اوس ویلے دے صدر فیلٖڈ مارشل محمد ایوب خان نے چالو کیتا ۔

                1992ء دے طوفانی سیلاب نے بالاکوٹ تے آل دوالے بہت نقصان کیتا ۔جس پاروں ایس دی قدرتی خوبصورتی وی متاثر ہوئی ۔ سڑکاں خراب ہو گئیاں ،پر پاک فوج دے جواناں نے ایہناں...

أحاديث الأحكام المختلفة على سفيان الثوري بابدال الراوي وأثرها على اختلاف الفقهاء

The differences in the transmissions of the Hadith have great impact on the disagreement among the jurists, and this sets in the diversity in Fiqh. This research is about the disagreement of narrators from Imam Sufyan al-Thawri in the Asanid of Hadiths which are collected from the book “Ellal al-hadith by Imam al-Daraqutni”. The difference among the narrators exist in the Sanad by the change of narrator in the Sanad, and it results in the disagreement its impact on the various jurisprudential issues between Jurists Key words: Canonical Ahadith, Narrators of Sufian al-Thawri, Disagreement among the Jurists.

An Analysis of Indian, Russian & Us Responses to China Pakistan Economic Corridor

Every state adopts a policy in response to an issue or in reaction to other state’s policy. But when two states come up with a divert policy responses to the same issue, it raises many questions in the academic and intellectual community. The aim of the study is to inquire why two or more states adopt different policy responses to a similar issue. In specific, the study tried to investigate the policy responses of India, Russia and America towards CPEC. Additionally, the study is designed to answer what are the differences in their policy responses and why. Lastly, the study also probes into their channels or sources through they are communicating their policy responses over CPEC. Factor analysis method was used for answering the research questions to explore the level of variations in the policy responses of India, Russia and America to CPEC. To support the study from theoretical perspective, Decision Making Theory, articulated in the Schematic Model, was applied. In its methodology, the research designed to thoroughly analyze CPEC by investigating its origin, rationale, interests of Beijing and Islamabad, short and long term planning, challenges and opportunities and its political, economic and strategic implications for both the Iron Brothers and for the regions including, South Asia, Middle East and Central Asia. Secondly, a comparative analysis of rationale and sources of Indian, Russian and American policy responses over CPEC have been presented. It was found that the diversity in the policy responses of India, Russia and USA to CPEC shaped by multiple internal and external factors. The three states have different interests in China and Pakistan and their joint project, CPEC. For New Delhi, both states are rival and hostile since its inception and CPEC is the question of their security and integrity. For Moscow, China is a strategic partner while Pakistan is a new emerging ally in South Asia while CPEC is just another opportunity and a trade corridor that connects Eurasian region with the rest of the World. For Washington, China an economic rival that has challenged US hegemony across the globe; while Pakistan is a trustless ally throughout the Cold War and post 9/11. America considers CPEC as part of Beijing OBOR initiative and does not welcome it as it undermines its economic and strategic interests in the regions of SA, CARs and Middle East. Keeping in mind the theoretical questions, the study found that the spectrum of factors shaping the responses of the three countries are; political structure, political culture, diversity in traditions, norms and values, priorities, perception of threats, differences in capacity and skills of policy makers, political and economic dependency, geographic position, choice and time, idiosyncratic factor, leadership skills and the capacity of policy makers and their decision-making dexterity. In response to the policy responses of New Delhi, Moscow and Washington to CPEC, it was found that for India, CPEC is the issue of sovereignty as the project passes through GB which New Delhi claims an integral part of Jammu and Kashmir. Moscow’s response to CPEC is mixed, as on the one hand Moscow did not join the project but on the other hand it supported the idea of integration that ultimately supports Russian Eurasian vision. Washington response to CPEC was initialy ambiguous, but the new administration came up with a clear message and rejected both OBOR; and CPEC on the grounds of Indian rationales. From rationales and sources analysis, the study found, New Delhi never miss any platform at global, regional and national level where it could voice their response to CPEC, thus, adopting a rigid stance against both China and Pakistan about the construction of CPEC and its implications. Russia mostly used state run official sources of communications to come up with a response to CPEC through electronic and print media to count its soften attitude and balance approach. The US issues its official stance through the offices of Sectary of State, Defense Sectary and White House to show their concerns about the Chinese OBOR and, specifically, CPEC.