جناب صلاح الدین اویسی مرحوم
جناب غلام محمود بنات والا کی فرقت کا صدمہ ابھی کم نہ ہوا تھا کہ مجلس اتحاد المسلمین کے قائد، فرزند دکن اور سالار ملت، سلطان صلاح الدین اویسی بھی اس دنیا سے رخصت ہوگئے، امت ایک اور ہوش مند، جرأت مند اور حوصلہ مند راہبر سے محروم ہوگئی، وہ عرصے سے صاحب فراش تھے، عمر مستعار کم نہ تھی، وقت موعود آیا اور رمضان المبارک کے نہایت مبارک اور آخری عشرے میں یعنی ۲۸؍ رمضان کو وہ اپنے مالک حقیقی کی رحمتوں سے جاملے ، اناﷲ وانا الیہ راجعون۔
قریب ساٹھ ستر سال پہلے جب مجلس اتحاد المسلمین کے بانی نواب بہادر یار جنگ کا ۱۹۴۴ء میں انتقال ہوا تھا تو اس وقت مولانا سید سلیمان ندوی نے معارف میں ان کا ماتم کرتے ہوئے لکھا تھا کہ ’’ان کا سا آدمی صدیوں میں پیدا ہوتا ہے اور جب پیدا ہوتا ہے تو انقلاب انگیز ہوتا ہے، ان کی ذات سے امت اسلامیہ کو بڑی بڑی امیدیں قائم تھیں اور خصوصیت کے ساتھ دکن کے مسلمانوں کے حق میں ان کا وجود آب حیات کا حکم رکھتا تھا‘‘۔
۱۹۴۴ء اور ۲۰۰۸ء کا زمانی فرق، تغیرات احوال کے لحاظ سے زمین آسمان کا فرق ہے لیکن صلاح الدین اویسی مرحوم کی ہستی کے لیے ان الفاظ کی حقیقت میں ذرا فرق نہیں۔
سلطنت آصفیہ اسلامیہ میں مجلس اتحاد المسلمین کا قیام، قومی تخیل اور سیاسی جذبوں کو نئی زندگی دینے کے ساتھ مسلمانوں کی تعلیمی اور معاشرتی ترقی کے لیے ہوا تھا، نصب العین تو ’’وسیع تر، عظیم تر، بیرونی و اندرونی مداخلتوں سے پاک اور کامل آزاد حیدرآباد تھا‘‘ اس وقت اس مجلس کے حوصلوں کو دیکھ کر کہا گیا تھا کہ دکن کے مسلمانوں نے صدیوں کے آرام کے بعد کروٹ لی ہے لیکن چند برسوں کے بعد تد اول...
The belief of the finality of Prophet Hood (Khatm e Nabuwwat) is the basic belief of the Muslim Ummah, and this belief has been adopted since the first day. From the time of the Prophet ﷺ until now, the belief in the end of Prophet Hood has been protected on practical grounds and intellectually. Muslim scholars and philosophers, while strengthening it on the basis of rational and simulated arguments, did not leave a single aspect from which it could be undermined. They presented simulated arguments for the misguided sects in Muslim Ummah and for the non-Muslims, presented rational arguments in such a way that there was no reason left to disbelieve this belief. In this research article, there is a description of the simulated and rational arguments that are usually presented, such as the Quranic verses and their interpretation, the Hadiths, and the sayings of the scholars. And it has also been narrated what their style of reasoning is, in the same way, the legislation that has been passed in this regard in Pakistan has been presented in detail. Hopefully, this will make it clear what are the services of scholars and thinkers on this issue and what is their style.
This work had tried to identify sources of competitive advantage for Pakistan in trade with India.Focusing five industries from both countries for the period 2005 to 2015. Industries include textile, Sugar and Sugar Confectionaries, Inorganic Chemicals, edible fruits,and nuts and Agriculture. A detailed literature review, Ratio analysis, and regression analysis were applied, to identify impediments to trade with India, future trade prospects, sources of competitive advantage for Pakistan, and assess the effects of granting of MFN status to India. The analysis identified many impediments to trade by India, like tariffs, quota, strict quality, non-tariff barriers, Visa policy, hindering trade between both countries.The intraregional trade share suggests a very costly future trade between both countries, intra-regional trade share suggested that the aggregate trade of Pakistan and India is not very significant in the world.The intraregional trade introversion index suggested that trade between both countries had an extra-regional bias suggesting trade diversion. The ratio of revealed comparative advantage suggested that Pakistani textile was not consistently competitive, but Inorganic chemical, Agriculture, Sugarand sugar confectionaries and Edible fruits and nuts industries were not competitive during the period under study.Whereas, textile and sugar and sugar confectionery were sustainable competitive but all the other Indian industries were not consistently competitive. The regression analysis suggests that government policy had significantly affected the national competitive advantage of Pakistan. Whereas for India, government policy and firm strategy and rivalry were significant. The research concludes that both Pakistan and India are facing the same problems regarding their factor conditions, demand condition, supporting and related industries. As compared to Pakistan, India is providing a better business environment and its relatively easy to conduct business in India. The governments of both countries are trying to liberalize trade and playing a positive role but the main hindrance is political and military interference in many issues. Both countries have the potential for future trade, but for that, they have to abolish their NTBs, tariffs and devise fairly liberal trade policies against each other.