نہ کر توں مان وساہواں دا
چھڈ جانا ایں پنجرا ساہواں دا
انج عشق دیوانہ کیتا اے
ہو گیا اے حال تباہواں دا
اتوں فجری ویلا آ ہویا
راہ تک تک تیریاں راہواں دا
جیہڑیاں پتر شہید کراندیاں نیں
دھن جگرا اے انہاں ماواں دا
بھانویں لکھ موبائل آ گئے نیں
ہے اپنا رنگ سنیاہواں دا
اینویں رو رو رائیگاں عمر گئی
مُل پیا نہ میریاں ہاہواں دا
جس تھاں تے اوس سلام کیتا
کراں ادب میں انہاں تھاواں دا
پڑھ لکھ کروڑ سلام نبیؐ تے
راہ مل مدینے دیاں راہواں دا
مرے ماں تے پتہ لگ جاندا
کی قدر اے ٹھنڈیاں چھاواں دا
پھرے پیا حنیف ہو دیوانہ
ایہو اثر ہے تیز نگاہواں دا
Background and Aim: The majority of people suffered with low back pain (LBP) at least once during their lifetime. As such, LBP is a highly prevalent and costly condition. People respond inappropriately as a result of current or possible risks and establish defensive habits (for example, hyper-vigilance) that aim at avoiding new injuries. A continued reconciling of studies which provide various answers for the same issue will be necessary for treatment decisions. This study is performed to conclude the function of Kinesiophobia and check it on Pain, Disability and Quality of Life in Patients that are suffering from Chronic Low Back Pain: A Systematic Review.
Methodology: A Systematic Review has been conducted. Secondary data collected from Electronic database including PubMed, Medline and Cochrain Library from inception to 2010. Total 554 Article found out of which 10 articles included in the study after excluding the duplicate article, Quality screening through Pedro Scale, and article don’t fulfilling the inclusion criteria of the study. Review completed within 9 months after approval of synopsis.
Results: According to this Review total Sample size was 554 with mean Sample size 130±90, mean Age 46±5 years, Mean of Pain Intensity (VAS 0-10) 6.12±1.5, mean Pain Duration 30±14, mean Kinesiophobia Measures (Tampa Scale of Kinesiophobia 0-68) 37±6.5, mean Disability (Oswestry Disability Index 0-100%) 56±27, mean Quality of Life (SF 36 0-100) 39.17±15.197.
Conclusion: TSK scores showed a statistically significant correlation with Pain, Disability, education level, and SF-36 QOL. As the education level decreases, kinesiophobia scores increase and as kinesiophobia scores increase, Level of disability increases and the quality of life decreases. Patients with kinesiophobia presented greater pain intensity, a greater fear of movement and of performing physical activities and it was also associated with worse quality of life.
Violence among students is a serious problem, especially in public schools. It is difficult to achieve the standardized level of education in public schools without lessening violence among students, since violence makes it difficult for students to learn regardless of how good the teachers or curriculum are. Although the students who involve in violence cannot be expected better results, they however undergo the consequences, either the harm that comes from being maltreated or the punishment that comes from being the aggressor. The aim of the study was to investigate the types of violence among students, the reasons behind this violence and the teachers? strategies to control this violence. It was a descriptive study with survey design. All the male secondary school teachers (769) of District Sialkot were the population of the study. For taking inferences and generalization data was collected through 304 randomly selected male secondary school teachers.After the validation by experts and considering the content validity ratio of items a questionnaire was used to collect data. Analysis of data were drawn by using descriptive (Frequency & Mean) as well as inferential statistics (T-Test & Anova). The study reveal students? violence of calling bad names, quarrelling with fellows, using others? belongings without consent, abusing, threatening others, grabbing writing material of other students and slapping other students have witnessed by the teachers in the schools. The study found psychological problems and moral issues, economic problems in the families of students, parenting style and teacher behavior as causes of violence among students. Counseling, warning and informing to head teachers are found best strategies respectively. Schools are supposed to provide learning supportive environment which surely influence students? attitude. There is family on one side who plays very important role in student development while on the other hand school also has equally important role in building the character of students.