Search or add a thesis

Advanced Search (Beta)
Home > Distribution and Molecualr Phylogeny of Artemisia Plants from Gilgit-Baltistan, Pakistan

Distribution and Molecualr Phylogeny of Artemisia Plants from Gilgit-Baltistan, Pakistan

Thesis Info

Access Option

External Link

Author

Hussain, Adil

Program

PhD

Institute

International Islamic University

City

Islamabad

Province

Islamabad.

Country

Pakistan

Thesis Completing Year

2019

Thesis Completion Status

Completed

Subject

Biotechnology

Language

English

Link

http://prr.hec.gov.pk/jspui/bitstream/123456789/11070/1/Adil_Hussain_Biotechnology_2019_IIU_08.04.2019.pdf

Added

2021-02-17 19:49:13

Modified

2024-03-24 20:25:49

ARI ID

1676725913733

Similar


In Pakistan, currently 38 species of the genus Artemisia (Asteraceae) have been identified so far. These Artemisia species were found in different phytogeographical regions including the Gilgit-Baltistan region of Pakistan. In this doctoral thesis, emphasis have been given to the ethnobotany, floral morphology, foliar epidermal anatomy (Epidermal cells/stomata types and diversity in trichomes), pollen morphology, phytogeography and molecular phylogeny of Artemisia species from Gilgit-Baltistan region of Pakistan.This study explored some rare species of the genus Artemisia and their folk medicinal uses from Gilgit-Baltistan region of Pakistan. The areas with deprived documentation of traditional information were covered and the native traditional medicinal awareness of the Artemisia species was acknowledged. For the first time in this investigation, 15 Artemisia species were explored and presented in the form of plates. These ethnobotanicaly important species were, Artemisia absinthium L., Artemisia annua L., Artemisia austriaca Jacq., Artemisia biennis Willd., Artemisia campestris L., Artemisia chamaemelifolia Vill., Artemisia herba-alba Asso., Artemisia indica Willd., Artemisia maritima L. Ex Hook. F., Artemisia rutifolia sub sp., Artemisia rutifolia var., Artemisia scoparia Waldst. & Kit., Artemisia sieversiana Ehrhl. Ex Willd., Artemisia verlotiorum Lamotte., and Artemisia vulgaris L. The native people of different regions of Gilgi-Baltistan uses different parts of these Artemisia species as food, ornaments, fuel and for medicinal purposes and were employed against more than 30 different kinds of ailments. The morphology of this genus is very complex and difficult to address. This is because the same species shows different forms under certain ecological conditions. Therefore, it was a dire need to revise the morphology of Artemisia species from Gilgit-Baltistan region of Pakistan. In this study, 66 morphological characters of 20 Artemisia species were nominated for the cladistics analysis of genus Artemisia. The consequential cladogram divided genus Artemisia into five major clades. Subgenus Artemisia and subgenus Absinthium were dispersed between the clades of other sections and appeared as a polyphyletic. All the remaining sections were found to be monophyletic. Subgenus Seriphidium was grouped with Artemisia clade which authenticates its recombination with the genus Artemisia. The micro-morphological attributes of foliar epidermal cells of 19 Artemisia species and stomata types of 17 Artemisia species using SEM and LM were evaluated. Primary
Loading...
Loading...

Similar Books

Loading...

Similar Chapters

Loading...

Similar News

Loading...

Similar Articles

Loading...

Similar Article Headings

Loading...

ہندوستانی اقبال شناس سید مظفر حسین برنی،اقبال کے خطوط اور صحتِ متن

فکرِ اقبال کا مطالعہ قلب و ذہن کو تر و تازگی عطا کرتا ہے۔قاری تحقیق و تنقید کی نئی دنیا میں سفر کرتا ہے۔نئی راہیں سامنے آتی ہیں اور اقبالیات کی حدود بھی توسیع اختیار کرتی ہیں۔ اقبال شناس اپنی قابلیت،فہم اور فراست کی بدولت نئے پہلو سامنے لاتے ہیں۔ہندوستان کے اقبال شناس سید مظفر حسین نے بھی اقبال کے افکار کا مطالعہ کیا اور پیشہ ورانہ ذمہ داریوں کی مصروفیات کے باوجود اقبال کے تمام دستیاب خطوط کو یک جا کیا اور چار جلدوں میں شائع کیا۔آپ اعلیٰ تعلیم یافتہ اور محبِ اقبال تھے جس کی تصدیق کے لیے آپ کی کاوشوں کا خزانہ دستیاب ہے۔آپ نے آئی سی ایس کا امتحان اعلیٰ درجے میں پاس کیا۔ہندوستان کے سرکاری اداروں میں اہم ترین عہدوں پر ذمہ داریاں ادا کرتے ہوئے اپنی قابلیت کا لوہا منوایا۔مصروفیت کے باوجود اقبال سے محبت کا اظہار کرتے ہوئے بھوپال میں ایک لیکچر دیا جو کتابی صورت میں سامنے آیا۔ہندوستان کی کئی زبانوں میں اس کا ترجمہ ہواجو ہندوستان میں اقبال شناسی کے فروغ کا باعث ہے۔بھوپال میں اقبال انسٹی ٹیوٹ کے قیام میں اہم کردار ادا کیا اور بہار میں اردو زبان کی توسیع کے لیے بھی اہم کردار ادا کیا۔فکرِ اقبال میں نثر کا شاندار خزانہ کلیاتِ مکاتیبِ اقبال کی شکل میں بکھرا پڑا تھا۔اقبال شناس اس خواہش کا اظہار کرتے دکھائی دیتے تھے کہ کوئی اقبال کے خطوط کو یک جا کرنے کا فریضہ سرانجام دے۔اقبال کے خطوط کوئی لیلیٰ مجنوں کے خطوط نہ تھے ان میں علم و ادب،مذہب،سیاست،شاعری،اسفار اور خیالات کے گوہر ہائے آبدار پوشیدہ ہیں۔انہیں اکٹھا کرنا اور ان کی تدوین کے مرحلے سے گزرنا جوئے شیر لانے سے کم نہ تھا۔متن کی تصدیق کا مرحلہ اس حوالے سے سب سے زیادہ مشکل کام تھا۔سید مظفر حسین برنی نے یہ بیڑا اٹھایا اور کئی سال...

تفسیرِ ماجدی کے منتخب آیات کی روشنی میں یہودیت کے متعلق مولانا عبد الماجد دریابادی کی آراء کا تحقیقی و تجزیاتی مطالعہ

There is no doubt in the fact that Judaism is the oldest Abrahamic religion among all. Judaism is not only the oldest religion, but it provides a foundation for the coming two Abrahamic religions as well i.e. Christianity and Islam. There have already been rigorous discussions in the existing literature regarding the beliefs and history of Judaism. Scholars have also shed light on the beliefs of various sects of Jews. ‘Tafseeri-Majdi’ is one such contribution to the literature. The present study focuses on the work of Majdi and discusses various famous theories, stories, and personalities presented in his ‘Tafseer’. The present study attempts to shed light on the life of Abdul Majid Daryabadi, the methodology adopted in his ‘Tafseer’, and analysis of his approaches and discussions about Judaism.

Prevalence, Clinical Importance and Predictors of Potential Drug-Drug Interactions in Different Wards of Tertiary Care Hospital Setting

Multiple drug prescriptions are very common for the treatment of various ailments and such therapy may be the potential source of drug-drug interactions (DDIs). DDIs can result in alteration of therapeutic response or increase untoward effects of many drugs. In hospitalized patients, the issue of DDIs deserves more attention due to severity of diseases, comorbid conditions, chronic diseases, polypharmacy, complex therapeutic regimens, and frequent modification in therapy. To the best of our knowledge, no data are available regarding the prevalence and nature of potential drug-drug interactions (pDDIs) in hospital settings in Pakistan. Studies are needed to explore pDDIs in hospital settings in Pakistan. This will help physicians and clinical pharmacists to identify and manage pDDIs. The objectives of the present study were to identify prevalence, levels and predictors of pDDIs in pulmonology, psychiatry, cardiology, pediatrics and internal medicine wards of tertiary care hospital settings in Khyber Pakhtunkhwa (KPK), Pakistan. This study involved evaluation of 2015 patients’ profiles from five different wards (at least 400 from each ward) of two major tertiary care hospitals of KPK, Pakistan (a) Ayub Teaching Hospital (b) Khyber Teaching Hospital. Micromedex Drug-Reax software (Thomson Reuters Healthcare Inc., Greenwood Village, Colorado, United States) was used to screen patients’ profiles for pDDIs. Logistic regression was applied to determine the odds ratio for specific risk factors of pDDIs such as patients’ age, number of prescribed medications, patients’ gender and duration of hospital stay. In pulmonology ward, 400 patients’ profiles were evaluated for pDDIs. Total 126 interacting drug-combinations were identified that encountered in 558 numbers of pDDIs. Overall, 45% patients were exposed to at least one pDDI regardless of type of severity, 24% to at least one major pDDIs and 36% patients to at least one moderate pDDIs. Among 558 pDDIs, most were of moderate (53.6%) or major severity (34%); good (74.2%) or fair (16.3%) type of scientific evidence; and delayed onset (70%). Thirteen interacting drug-pairs were considered potentially important interactions and included dexamethasone + rifampin (41 cases), isoniazid + rifampin (38), furosemide + captopril (38), rifampin + pyrazinamide (38), acetaminophen + isoniazid (20), spironolactone + captopril (18), digoxin + furosemide (16), potassium chloride + spironolactone (15), prednisolone + rifampin (15), furosemide + aspirin (13), potassium chloride + captopril (13), levofloxacin + prednisolone (12), and digoxin + spironolactone (10). There was significant association of the occurrence of pDDIs with patients’ age of 60 years or more (odds ratio (OR) = 3.85; 95% confidence interval (CI) = 2.17-6.83; p < 0.001), hospital stay of 7 days or longer (OR = 2.33; 95% CI = 1.23-4.43; p < 0.001), and 7 or more number of prescribed medications (OR = 27.63; 95% CI = 14.6-52.3; p < 0.001). Of 415 patients from psychiatry ward, 64.8% patients had at least one pDDI (overall prevalence), 27.2% patients at least one major pDDIs, and 58.5% patients at least one moderate pDDI. Total, 126 interacting drug-pairs were identified that presented in 825 numbers of pDDIs. Of 825 pDDIs, most were of moderate (75.6%) or major severity (20.8%); good (66.4%) or fair (29%) type of scientific evidence; and delayed onset (71%). Most frequent potentially important interactions included haloperidol + procyclidine (127 cases), haloperidol + olanzapine (49), haloperidol + promethazine (47), haloperidol + fluphenazine (41), diazepam + divalproex sodium (40), haloperidol + trihexyphenidyl (37), lorazepam + divalproex sodium (34), fluphenazine + procyclidine (33), olanzapine + divalproex sodium (32), promethazine + procyclidine (29), promethazine + trihexyphenidyl (25), trifluoperazine + procyclidine (17), haloperidol + chlorpromazine (14), alprazolam + fluoxetine (13), and divalproex sodium + risperidone (13). There was significant association of the occurrence of pDDIs with hospital stay of 7 days or longer (OR = 2.01; 95% CI = 1.23-3.28; p = 0.005), and 7 or more number of prescribed medications (OR = 3.33; 95% CI = 2.03-5.48; p < 0.001). In 400 patients’ profiles from cardiology ward, 100 interacting drug-combinations were identified that encountered in 1120 pDDIs. Overall, 77.5% patients were exposed to at least one pDDI of any severity, 36.75% to at least one major pDDI, and 69.75% to at least one moderate pDDI. Of 1120 identified-pDDIs, most were of moderate (56.3%) or major severity (25.4%); fair (45.3%) or good (42%) type of scientific evidence; and delayed onset (50.4%). Sixteen interacting drug-pairs, eight each of major and moderate severity, were considered potentially important interactions and included ramipril + aspirin (129 cases), nitroglycerin + aspirin (100), furosemide + aspirin (59), digoxin + furosemide (41), heparin + aspirin (39), digoxin + spironolactone (35), spironolactone + aspirin (34), warfarin + spironolactone (34), furosemide + ramipril (29), spironolactone + ramipril (23), lisinopril + aspirin (22), warfarin + aspirin (17), heparin + nitroglycerin (14), warfarin + amiodarone (14), digoxin + amiodarone (13), and clopidogrel + omeprazole (11). There was significant association of the occurrence of pDDIs with patients’ age of 65 years or more (OR = 2.32; 95% CI = 1.26-4.28; p = 0.007), male gender (OR = 1.94; 95% CI = 1.07-3.53; p = 0.03), hospital stay of 4 days or longer (OR = 3.51; 95% CI = 1.60-7.70; p = 0.002), and 7 or more number of prescribed medications (OR = 26.84; 95% CI = 11.11-64.83; p < 0.001). In pediatrics ward, pDDIs of any severity were identified in 25.8% patients, major pDDIs in 10.75% patients, and moderate pDDIs in 15.25% patients. Total 86 interacting drug- combinations were recorded that presented in 260 pDDIs, of which, most were of moderate severity (41.5%); good (76.9%) or fair (16.5%) type of scientific evidence; and delayed onset (46.5%). Eleven interacting drug-pairs (4 major and 7 moderate) were considered potentially important interactions and included rifampin + pyrazinamide (14 cases), phenobarbital + diazepam (14), dexamethasone + rifampin (8), amikacin + furosemide (7), furosemide + captopril (7), dexamethasone + phenobarbital (6), phenobarbital + divalproex sodium (6), isoniazid + rifampin (5) amikacin + ibuprofen (5), digoxin + furosemide (4), and acetaminophen + phenytoin sodium (4). There was significant association of the occurrence of pDDIs with 5 or more number of prescribed medications (OR = 6.82; 95% CI = 4.0-11.59; p < 0.001). In internal medicine wards, 188 interacting drug-combinations were identified that contributed to 675 pDDIs. Of 400 patients, 52.8% patients were presented with at least one pDDI (overall prevalence), 21.25% with at least one major pDDI, and 44.25% with at least one moderate pDDI. Among 675 pDDIs, most were of moderate (63.6%) or major severity (23%); good (61.2%) or fair (25.5%) type of scientific evidence; and delayed onset (50.2%). Twenty interacting drug-pairs (9 major and 11 moderate) were considered potentially clinically important interactions and included furosemide + aspirin (38 cases), rifampin + pyrazinamide (37), isoniazid + rifampin (35), furosemide + ramipril (21), acetaminophen + isoniazid (20), furosemide + captopril (17), furosemide + lisinopril (16), insulin + aspirin (15), dexamethasone + rifampin (15), captopril + aspirin (14), aspirin + ramipril (14), nitroglycerin + aspirin (14), lisinopril + aspirin (14), heparin + aspirin (10), warfarin + aspirin (5), and spironolactone + ramipril (5). There was significant association of the occurrence of pDDIs with patients’ age of 60 years or more (OR = 2.06; 95% CI = 1.27-3.33; p = 0.003), hospital stay of 6 days or longer (OR = 2.58; 95% CI = 1.50-4.45; p = 0.001), and 7 or more number of prescribed medications (OR = 5.88; 95% CI = 3.62-9.55; p < 0.001). In conclusion, the present study has recorded a high prevalence of pDDIs in pulmonology, psychiatry, cardiology and internal medicine wards. Most of the interactions were of moderate severity, however, major pDDIs were also recorded in considerable number. Patients with old age, longer hospital stay and increased number of prescribed drugs were more exposed to pDDIs. Close monitoring of patients is recommended to manage and prevent negative clinical outcomes of these interactions." xml:lang="en_US