Search or add a thesis

Advanced Search (Beta)
Home > Management of Insect Pests of Cotton Through Eco-Friendly Measures

Management of Insect Pests of Cotton Through Eco-Friendly Measures

Thesis Info

Access Option

External Link

Author

Noonari, Abdul Majeed

Program

PhD

Institute

Sindh Agriculture University

City

Tandojam

Province

Sindh

Country

Pakistan

Thesis Completing Year

2016

Thesis Completion Status

Completed

Subject

Entomology

Language

English

Link

http://prr.hec.gov.pk/jspui/bitstream/123456789/11239/1/Abdul%20Majeed%20Noonari_Entomology_2016_SAU_incomplete.pdf

Added

2021-02-17 19:49:13

Modified

2024-03-24 20:25:49

ARI ID

1676726604881

Asian Research Index Whatsapp Chanel
Asian Research Index Whatsapp Chanel

Join our Whatsapp Channel to get regular updates.

Similar


Five experiments were conducted consecutively for two years (2006 and 2007) for management of cotton insect pests through eco-friendly measures. In experiment-1, cotton agro-ecosystem analysis was carried out mainly based on measurement of the basic components i.e. recording the pest population, damage and natural enemies interactions with pest populations. In experiment-2, eight cotton varieties (CIM-499, TH-57/76, FH-901, CIM-473, CRIS-134, Chandi, Shahbaz and NIAB-78) were screened and monitored for their resistance against sucking insect complexes and bollworms. In experiment-3, sunflower, maize, okra and Sorghum were used as trap crops (sown in cotton) and sucking complex on cotton was compared; the effect of natural enemies on the insect pest population was examined. The population monitoring of spotted bollworm through pheromone traps was carriedout.Similarly, in experiment-4, biopesticiedes (Neem extract, Neem oil, Asafoetida (Hing) and Tobacco) were evaluated against sucking complex, with the compoent-5, model of eco-friendly measures package and IPM techniques was suggested. The results of experiment-1; showed that thrips population appeared on cotton at the age of 24-31 days after planting (DAP) and continued up to harvest. Its peak activity period varied from 1st week of June to last week of July during two years of the study period. This showed that after reaching the age of about two months the cotton crop observed maximum mean thrips population (8.71) per leaf during June-July. The whitefly attackedits vegetative growth at the age of 20-24 (DAP). The peak activity of the pest was recorded from 2nd week of June to 3rd week of July. Maximum peak population (3.20) per leaf was recorded during 2nd week of July. The jassid appeared at the age of 24-31 (DAP) in third week of May and continued upto crop harvest. Maximum activity on cotton remained during June and July with maximum mean of (2.13) per leaf during 2nd week of July. Similarly, the spotted bollworm species appeared on cotton in 3rd week of June on fruiting bodies and continued up to crop harvest. Its peak activity (0.93-2.60) per plant was recorded from 2nd week of August to 3rd week of September and decreased upto crop harvet. The larvae 265 collected from cotton were kept under labartory conditions in which 224 of Earias vitella and 41 of E.insulana emerged. The study confirmed that E. vitella existed in large nembers than E. insulana at the ratio of 57.33: 7.33. The findings of experiment-2; revealed that none of the variety was found immune to the attack of insect pests CIM-499 variety of cotton received the lowest mean whitefly population (0.51), jassid (0.61) and thrips (3.10) per leaf. Whereas, the overall lowest mean population of spotted bollworms (1.41) per plant was recorded in Shahbaz. The findings of experiment-3, indicated that cotton plant alone suffered maximum attack of pests in comparison to cotton planted with different trap crops.Theoverall maximum mean population of thrips was recorded in cotton alone (3.11)followed by (2.99), (2.93), (2.41) and(0.89) per leaf in cotton with Sorghum, cotton with sunflower, cotton with okra and cotton with maize.Similarly, the maximum jassids number (2.61) per leaf was obseved in cotton alone followed by (1.25), (1.24), (1.14) and (0.87) per leaf in cotton with sunflower, cotton with Sorghum, cotton with maize and cotton with okra.The maximum number of whitefly (1.54) per leaf was recorded in cotton alone followed by (1.07) (1.04), (0.89) and (0.82) per leaf in cotton with Sorghum, cotton with maize, cotton with sunflower and cotton with okra. Comparatively higher mean number of spotted bollworms (1.72) per plant was observed in cotton alone followed by (0.79), (0.64), (0.55) and (0.50) in cotton with maize, cotton with sunflower, cotton with Sorghum and cotton with okra, respectively. This showed that the trap crops contributed in pest reductions on cotton crops by attracting the pests as well as natural enemies which ultimatly reduced pest pressure on cotton (main crop). The okra and sunflower attracted sucking pests.The use of sex pheromone traps is advised for supressing of spotted bollworm in cotton. Two species of spiny bollworms were attracted to the sex pheromones traps. Average number of E. vitella (7.22-9.01) was attracted whereas, E. insulana ranged between (1.08-1.33) under field condition. The experiment regarding evaluation botanical pesticides showed that among all pesticides reduction of thrip (67.65%) was recorded in neem extract followed by Neem oil (60.00%), Tobacco (63.59%) and Hing (Asafoetida) (52.68%) after 96 h. of application of pesticides. Overall maximum mean reduction (64.69%) was recorded in neem extract followed by neem oil (57.74%), tobacco (52.91%) and Asafoetida (46.52%).The heighest reduction of jassid (71.97%) was recorded followed by neem oil (70.06%), Hing (Asafoetida) (68.15%) and tobacco (23.56%) after 96 h., of application of pesticides. With regards to reduction percent of whitefly revealed that maximum reduction (60.18%) was recorded in Hing (Asafoetida) followed by neem oil (59.78%), neem extract (59.38%) and tobacco (40.61%) after 96 h., of spray application. The botanical pesticides started reducing their toxicity after 96 h. However, the effective reduction of pests was recorded up to one week. Therefore, the bio-pesticides reduced their effectiveness. Development model of IPM package control measures recommendation were based on two year study on different IPM techniques for benefit of farming community through seminars, trainings and pamphlates. Using the safe botanical pesticides remained effective against sucking pests and is recommended against cotton pests, which showed less effective to natural enemies and environment friendly
Loading...
Loading...

Similar Books

Loading...

Similar Chapters

Loading...

Similar News

Loading...

Similar Articles

Loading...

Similar Article Headings

Loading...

آرزو

آرزو
اے نقطہ راز کے واقف۔۔۔!
اے نقطہ راز کے واقف۔۔۔!
پہچان کے درویش۔۔۔و مِن الاصحاب عشق کا دعوی کرنے والے!
اے آشناء مستی کے روبرو۔۔۔!
افاعیل میں زحافات کی تقطیع کے اصلاحی علائم کو!
نظم میںمشخص کرنے والے۔۔۔!
ستیہ پال آنند، امجد اسلام امجد اور علی محمد فرشی مجھ سے بولتے نہیں
خالد سجاد ، اظہر عباس اور نعیم گیلانی تھکے ہوئے ہیں
ماجد مشتاق، افتخار شفیع اور شبیر بٹ سوئے ہوئے ہیں
ہوا شبنمی خوشبو کے ہم رکاب چل رہی ہے
چاندنی خشک کوزوں میں اترتے ہوئے!
محبت پہ درود اور چاہت پر سلام پڑھ رہی ہے
اب تم ہی آجاؤ نا۔۔۔!
ہم ترجیحی تدوین۔۔۔اختصار ترکیب پہ نہ سہی۔۔۔!
چلو نثری نظم پہ ہی مناظرہ کرتے ہیں

العلوم الطبيعية في القرآن الكريم

Quran has deep relation with science. For Example Quran teaches us about the creation of the world, human being, all the living and nonliving things and its advantages and disadvantages. Quran also tells us about the different diseases and its cure. Now in the modern time the scientist are following the Quran for their scientific research. There are 13 hundred verses in Quran belongs to human thoughts. Just like this there are different explanation about the human’s health and food and these things are related to science. The Quran has presented knowledge about mountains, sea, water, air environment etc.

Spatiotemporal Variation in Organochlorine and Pyrethroid Pesticides in Ecosystem of River Chenab

Present study was designed to monitor organochlorine and pyrethroids pesticides, possible sources, their spatial and temporal variations, bioaccumulation pattern in fish through water and sediments and human risk assessment. Levels of aldrin, o, p′, DDT p, p′, DDT o, p′, DDE p, p′, DDE, α-Endosulfan, β-Endosulfan from organochlorine and cypermethrin, deltamethrin, permethrin and bifenthrin from pyrethroids class were monitored in the present study. During the study, five fish species, four carnivores (Channa marulius, Anguilla rostrata, Channa punctatus and Wallagu attu) and one herbivore (Labeo boga) were sampled from the four headworks of the river Chenab. Samples were collected from three major aquatic matrices (water, sediments and fish) from the eight sampling sites situated at Marala, Khanki, Qadirabad and Trimu Headworks of River Chenab, during summer and winter seasons. Prior to analysis, liquid phase extraction technique was applied for water samples while all the collected sediment and fish samples were extracted by Soxhlet Extraction Technique. Samples were then processed to column chromatography for cleanup and analyzed by High Performance Liquid Chromatography (HPLC) after achieving LOD and LOQ and assuring all the quality control procedures. BCF and BSAF were calculated for the presence of relevant pesticides in water, fish and sediments. Human health risk was assessed for organochlorine and pyrethroids pesticides by consuming the contaminated fish. Physical and chemical parameters of both water and sediments collected from all the sampling sites of the river Chenab were determined. Analysis of variance (ANOVA), cluster analysis and PCA were applied for significance, classification of sites and source identification of pesticides. Concentrations of pesticides in surface waters of River Chenab ranged from 15 to165 and 23 to 275 ngL- 1 for organochlorine and 0.087 to 0.189 and 0.094 to 0.355 µgL-1 for pyrethroids during summer and winter seasons, respectively. Among organochlorine pesticides, DDTs exhibited the highest concentration in all water, sediments and fish samples, followed by Endosulfan and then aldrin while from pyrethroids group, deltamethrin showed highest values followed by cypermethrin, permethrin and then bifenthrin in descending order. Concentrations of DDT in water exceeded from the CCC concentration guidelines of USEPA while aldrin levels were higher than the PSQCA set criteria. Concentrations of pesticides in sediments ranged from 4.3 to 156.3 and 8.15 to 239.19 ngg-1 for organochlorine and 0.147 to 1.162 and 0.254 to 1.248 µgg-1 for pyrethroids during summer and winter seasons respectively. The risk assessment estimated that the 12.5-100% of sediments exceeded than the sediment quality guidelines while total DDTs level exceeded in 75-100% of sediments samples compared to the sediments quality standards. Indicative ratios of DDT with its isomer and metabolites suggested the past and current application and long transport range of organochlorine. Deltamethrin, cypermethrin and permethrin concentrations in water were found to be higher than their LC50 while levels of pyrethroids in sediments were below its LC50 values. Statistical analysis reflected the intensive agro-industrial activities and municipal effluents as major sources of organochlorine and pyrethroids in the freshwater ecosystem of river Chenab. The level of organochlorine monitored at Khanki Headworks (S3, S4) was relatively higher than the other three Headworks while level of pyrethroids was higher at Trimu Headworks (S7, S8) as compared to Marala, Khanki and Qadirabad Headworks. Organochlorine and pyrethroids levels in all the samples of water, sediments and fish were higher during winter season as compared to summer season. Organochlorine concentrations in fish ranged from 23.79 to 387.12 ngg-1 but 0.35 to 1.272 µgg-1 for pyrethroids during summer and winter seasons respectively indicated their bio-magnification in fish. Risk assessments of organochlorine pesticides showed that DDT contaminated fish intake would pose a health risk to humans. However, no immediate risk was assessed by pyrethroid contaminated fish consumption. Present study results highlighted both organochlorine (outdated) and pyrethroids (current) pesticides associated pollution in the riverine ecosystem of the river Chenab to mitigate the adverse situation. Current study also evaluated the phytoremediation potential of aquatic macrophytes (Eichhornia crassipes, Pistia stratiotes) and algae (chaetomorphasutoria, sirogoniumsticticum and zygnema sp.) for organochlorine and pyrethroids pesticides. Eleven treatments (T1- T11) with and without plants were used for phytoremediation of organochlorine and pyrethroid pesticides. Water and plant samples were extracted by liquid phase and solid phase extraction respectively and analyzed by high-performance liquid chromatography. During the experiment, P. stratiotes, E. crassipes and algae (C. sutoria, S. sticticum and Zygnema sp.) showed good removal efficiency with 62% (71% root, 29% shoot), 60% (67% root, 33% shoot), and 58% respectively for organochlorine and 76% (76% root, 24% shoot), 68% (69% root, 31% shoot), and 70% respectively for pyrethroids. Dissipation rate constant of treatments with plants (T2, T3, T5, T6, T8, and T9) was significantly higher (p < 0.05) as compared to treatments without plants i.e. T10 and T11 (control) for both organochlorine and pyrethroids. Bioconcentration factor of pyrethroids treatments (T3, T6, and T9) was significantly higher (p < 0.05) as compared to that of organochlorine treatments (T2, T5 and T8). The removal efficiency of E. crassipes, P. stratiotes and algae (C. sutoria, S. sticticum and Zygnema sp.) for pyrethroids was significantly higher (p < 0.01) as compared to that of organochlorine. Present study concluded that organochlorine and pyrethroids pesticides were abundantly found in the three aquatic environmental compartments (water, sediments and fish) that may cause a severe ecological risk to humans and other biota due to continuous and irregular use of these chemicals which ultimately add to the river Chenab via surface runoff or atmospheric deposition.