Search or add a thesis

Advanced Search (Beta)
Home > Prevalence, Clinical Importance and Predictors of Potential Drug-Drug Interactions in Different Wards of Tertiary Care Hospital Setting

Prevalence, Clinical Importance and Predictors of Potential Drug-Drug Interactions in Different Wards of Tertiary Care Hospital Setting

Thesis Info

Access Option

External Link

Author

Ismail, Mohammad

Program

PhD

Institute

University of Peshawar

City

Peshawar

Province

KPK

Country

Pakistan

Thesis Completing Year

2012

Thesis Completion Status

Completed

Subject

Applied Sciences

Language

English

Link

http://prr.hec.gov.pk/jspui/handle/123456789/1557

Added

2021-02-17 19:49:13

Modified

2024-03-24 20:25:49

ARI ID

1676727010897

Asian Research Index Whatsapp Chanel
Asian Research Index Whatsapp Chanel

Join our Whatsapp Channel to get regular updates.

Similar


Multiple drug prescriptions are very common for the treatment of various ailments and such therapy may be the potential source of drug-drug interactions (DDIs). DDIs can result in alteration of therapeutic response or increase untoward effects of many drugs. In hospitalized patients, the issue of DDIs deserves more attention due to severity of diseases, comorbid conditions, chronic diseases, polypharmacy, complex therapeutic regimens, and frequent modification in therapy. To the best of our knowledge, no data are available regarding the prevalence and nature of potential drug-drug interactions (pDDIs) in hospital settings in Pakistan. Studies are needed to explore pDDIs in hospital settings in Pakistan. This will help physicians and clinical pharmacists to identify and manage pDDIs. The objectives of the present study were to identify prevalence, levels and predictors of pDDIs in pulmonology, psychiatry, cardiology, pediatrics and internal medicine wards of tertiary care hospital settings in Khyber Pakhtunkhwa (KPK), Pakistan. This study involved evaluation of 2015 patients’ profiles from five different wards (at least 400 from each ward) of two major tertiary care hospitals of KPK, Pakistan (a) Ayub Teaching Hospital (b) Khyber Teaching Hospital. Micromedex Drug-Reax software (Thomson Reuters Healthcare Inc., Greenwood Village, Colorado, United States) was used to screen patients’ profiles for pDDIs. Logistic regression was applied to determine the odds ratio for specific risk factors of pDDIs such as patients’ age, number of prescribed medications, patients’ gender and duration of hospital stay. In pulmonology ward, 400 patients’ profiles were evaluated for pDDIs. Total 126 interacting drug-combinations were identified that encountered in 558 numbers of pDDIs. Overall, 45% patients were exposed to at least one pDDI regardless of type of severity, 24% to at least one major pDDIs and 36% patients to at least one moderate pDDIs. Among 558 pDDIs, most were of moderate (53.6%) or major severity (34%); good (74.2%) or fair (16.3%) type of scientific evidence; and delayed onset (70%). Thirteen interacting drug-pairs were considered potentially important interactions and included dexamethasone + rifampin (41 cases), isoniazid + rifampin (38), furosemide + captopril (38), rifampin + pyrazinamide (38), acetaminophen + isoniazid (20), spironolactone + captopril (18), digoxin + furosemide (16), potassium chloride + spironolactone (15), prednisolone + rifampin (15), furosemide + aspirin (13), potassium chloride + captopril (13), levofloxacin + prednisolone (12), and digoxin + spironolactone (10). There was significant association of the occurrence of pDDIs with patients’ age of 60 years or more (odds ratio (OR) = 3.85; 95% confidence interval (CI) = 2.17-6.83; p < 0.001), hospital stay of 7 days or longer (OR = 2.33; 95% CI = 1.23-4.43; p < 0.001), and 7 or more number of prescribed medications (OR = 27.63; 95% CI = 14.6-52.3; p < 0.001). Of 415 patients from psychiatry ward, 64.8% patients had at least one pDDI (overall prevalence), 27.2% patients at least one major pDDIs, and 58.5% patients at least one moderate pDDI. Total, 126 interacting drug-pairs were identified that presented in 825 numbers of pDDIs. Of 825 pDDIs, most were of moderate (75.6%) or major severity (20.8%); good (66.4%) or fair (29%) type of scientific evidence; and delayed onset (71%). Most frequent potentially important interactions included haloperidol + procyclidine (127 cases), haloperidol + olanzapine (49), haloperidol + promethazine (47), haloperidol + fluphenazine (41), diazepam + divalproex sodium (40), haloperidol + trihexyphenidyl (37), lorazepam + divalproex sodium (34), fluphenazine + procyclidine (33), olanzapine + divalproex sodium (32), promethazine + procyclidine (29), promethazine + trihexyphenidyl (25), trifluoperazine + procyclidine (17), haloperidol + chlorpromazine (14), alprazolam + fluoxetine (13), and divalproex sodium + risperidone (13). There was significant association of the occurrence of pDDIs with hospital stay of 7 days or longer (OR = 2.01; 95% CI = 1.23-3.28; p = 0.005), and 7 or more number of prescribed medications (OR = 3.33; 95% CI = 2.03-5.48; p < 0.001). In 400 patients’ profiles from cardiology ward, 100 interacting drug-combinations were identified that encountered in 1120 pDDIs. Overall, 77.5% patients were exposed to at least one pDDI of any severity, 36.75% to at least one major pDDI, and 69.75% to at least one moderate pDDI. Of 1120 identified-pDDIs, most were of moderate (56.3%) or major severity (25.4%); fair (45.3%) or good (42%) type of scientific evidence; and delayed onset (50.4%). Sixteen interacting drug-pairs, eight each of major and moderate severity, were considered potentially important interactions and included ramipril + aspirin (129 cases), nitroglycerin + aspirin (100), furosemide + aspirin (59), digoxin + furosemide (41), heparin + aspirin (39), digoxin + spironolactone (35), spironolactone + aspirin (34), warfarin + spironolactone (34), furosemide + ramipril (29), spironolactone + ramipril (23), lisinopril + aspirin (22), warfarin + aspirin (17), heparin + nitroglycerin (14), warfarin + amiodarone (14), digoxin + amiodarone (13), and clopidogrel + omeprazole (11). There was significant association of the occurrence of pDDIs with patients’ age of 65 years or more (OR = 2.32; 95% CI = 1.26-4.28; p = 0.007), male gender (OR = 1.94; 95% CI = 1.07-3.53; p = 0.03), hospital stay of 4 days or longer (OR = 3.51; 95% CI = 1.60-7.70; p = 0.002), and 7 or more number of prescribed medications (OR = 26.84; 95% CI = 11.11-64.83; p < 0.001). In pediatrics ward, pDDIs of any severity were identified in 25.8% patients, major pDDIs in 10.75% patients, and moderate pDDIs in 15.25% patients. Total 86 interacting drug- combinations were recorded that presented in 260 pDDIs, of which, most were of moderate severity (41.5%); good (76.9%) or fair (16.5%) type of scientific evidence; and delayed onset (46.5%). Eleven interacting drug-pairs (4 major and 7 moderate) were considered potentially important interactions and included rifampin + pyrazinamide (14 cases), phenobarbital + diazepam (14), dexamethasone + rifampin (8), amikacin + furosemide (7), furosemide + captopril (7), dexamethasone + phenobarbital (6), phenobarbital + divalproex sodium (6), isoniazid + rifampin (5) amikacin + ibuprofen (5), digoxin + furosemide (4), and acetaminophen + phenytoin sodium (4). There was significant association of the occurrence of pDDIs with 5 or more number of prescribed medications (OR = 6.82; 95% CI = 4.0-11.59; p < 0.001). In internal medicine wards, 188 interacting drug-combinations were identified that contributed to 675 pDDIs. Of 400 patients, 52.8% patients were presented with at least one pDDI (overall prevalence), 21.25% with at least one major pDDI, and 44.25% with at least one moderate pDDI. Among 675 pDDIs, most were of moderate (63.6%) or major severity (23%); good (61.2%) or fair (25.5%) type of scientific evidence; and delayed onset (50.2%). Twenty interacting drug-pairs (9 major and 11 moderate) were considered potentially clinically important interactions and included furosemide + aspirin (38 cases), rifampin + pyrazinamide (37), isoniazid + rifampin (35), furosemide + ramipril (21), acetaminophen + isoniazid (20), furosemide + captopril (17), furosemide + lisinopril (16), insulin + aspirin (15), dexamethasone + rifampin (15), captopril + aspirin (14), aspirin + ramipril (14), nitroglycerin + aspirin (14), lisinopril + aspirin (14), heparin + aspirin (10), warfarin + aspirin (5), and spironolactone + ramipril (5). There was significant association of the occurrence of pDDIs with patients’ age of 60 years or more (OR = 2.06; 95% CI = 1.27-3.33; p = 0.003), hospital stay of 6 days or longer (OR = 2.58; 95% CI = 1.50-4.45; p = 0.001), and 7 or more number of prescribed medications (OR = 5.88; 95% CI = 3.62-9.55; p < 0.001). In conclusion, the present study has recorded a high prevalence of pDDIs in pulmonology, psychiatry, cardiology and internal medicine wards. Most of the interactions were of moderate severity, however, major pDDIs were also recorded in considerable number. Patients with old age, longer hospital stay and increased number of prescribed drugs were more exposed to pDDIs. Close monitoring of patients is recommended to manage and prevent negative clinical outcomes of these interactions." xml:lang="en_US
Loading...
Loading...

Similar Books

Loading...

Similar Chapters

Loading...

Similar News

Loading...

Similar Articles

Loading...

Similar Article Headings

Loading...

مولانا حفیظ الرحمن واصف

مولاناحفیظ الرحمن واصف
گذشتہ مہینے (۱۳ مارچ) کواجڑنے اور باربار بسنے والی دلّی کی ایک اور فخر روزگار شخصیت مولانا حفیظ الرحمن واصف کی شکل میں اس دنیا سے اٹھ گئی اور دلّی کی بساط علم و دین اورادب وشعر پرچھایا ہوا اندھیرا کچھ اور گہرا ہوگیا، ان کی وفات پر محدود صحافتی اورعلمی حلقوں میں اضطراب اور ہلچل کی کمزورسی کیفیت نظر آئی جو مولانا حفیظ الرحمن واصف جیسی جلیل القدر شخصیت کے ماتم کے لیے نہ صرف ناکافی بلکہ کہناچاہیے کہ ان کی رفعت شان سے حددرجہ کم تر تھی۔ وہ ان ٹمٹماتی ہوئی شمعوں میں سے ایک شمع تھے جوآزادی سے پہلے اورآزادی کے بعد کی دہلی کی تمدنی تبدیلیوں اورلسانی اورسماجی تلاطم کی نوعیت اور کیفیتوں کی عکاس تھی اوروہ خود آزادی سے پہلے اور آزادی کے بعد کے درمیان نہ صرف حدِ فاصل کی حیثیت رکھتے تھے بلکہ ان کاشمارسماجی انقلاب حال کے مشہور ماتم گساروں اور میرؔ،سوداؔ، غالبؔ ،حالیؔ اورداغؔ جیسے نوحہ خوانوں میں ہوتاتھا۔
وہ اس خانوادۂ علم وشریعت کے چشم وچراغ تھے، جس نے ۱۸۵۷ء میں اجڑنے والی دہلی کواز سر نوسجانے اور بہاروں سے آراستہ کرنے میں حصہ لیا تھااور ایک پورے تمدن کی تباہی کے بعد اس کے ملبہ سے نئی اوردلآویز عمارت تعمیر کرنے کی ہمت دکھائی تھی۔
وہ حضرت مولانا مفتی کفایت اﷲ کے فرزند دلبند اوران کی سیرت اور خصلت کے بے شمار پہلوؤں میں ان کے حقیقی وارث اور جانشین تھے۔انہوں نے آنکھ کھول کراپنے یگانہ روزگار والد کے علاوہ جن لوگوں کی آنکھیں دیکھی تھیں، اور جن کی صحبتوں سے فیض اٹھایا تھاوہ سب وہ لوگ تھے کہ اب ان کا ثانی، دہلی کی سرزمین پرشاید ہی چشم فلک کوکبھی دیکھنا نصیب ہو۔
آج کی دہلی میں ان کاوجود بہاروں کی یادگار یاغالب کے الفاظ میں داغِ فراق صحبت شب کی...

The Impact of Lane Discipline on Speed and Time Headway

Lane discipline has a major impact on traffic density, speed, and time headway. In this paper, three-dimensional (3D) centre lane marking is used to enforced lane discipline.  Traffic congestion mitigated with three dimensional lane marking as the speed and headway increased. The Camlytics is used to observed the egress and ingress time. The statistics analysis noticed an increase in speed and headway after 3D lane marking. Gamma and Lognormal distributions are found the best fit for speed before and after 3D marking, respectively. Normal and Weibull distributions are the best fit for headway in the absence and presence of 3D lane markings, respectively. These distributions can be used for traffic flow characterization. This study recommends strictly enforcement of lane discipline to counter traffic congestion. 

Developing Young Childrens Creative Writing Ability in English As a Second Language in a Primary English Medium School in Karachi, Pakistan

The purpose of the study was to improve teaching of creative writing for young children in English as a second language. For this purpose, action research was done in an English medium private primary school in Karachi, Pakistan. Five students were involved as research participants and their teacher acted as my critical friend during the study. The main question asked was: How can I, as a teacher researcher, help children of class five to develop creative writing ability in English as a second language in an English medium primary school in Karachi, Pakistan? I conducted six cycles of action research. During each cycle I planned-acted-observed-reflected (See figure 1, action research cycle, chapter two) and used this experience and my reflection to plan the next cycle of research. Data collection was done through interview, document analysis, observation and reflection. I learnt during pre-intervention phase that there was an issue of children's motivation; there was too much control over children's writing; insufficient use was made of stimulating materials and activities to motivate and support creativity. I also learnt that no sense of audience was developed when writing, and there was no focus for writing of second drafts; as giving peer feedback was not practiced. I used a range of strategies to address these issues, for example. When pictures and other people's writings were used as a trigger children wrote with a lot of intent and enthusiasm. When music was played, children learnt the rhythm quickly and wrote poems easily. Children's imagination was supported through songs and pictures. When children's work was shared and published, they became motivated and confident. When a focus was provided for writing, the second draft the children's enthusiasm was sustained. The quality of writing also improved, because they were able to expand their ideas through answering questions asked by their peers. When children gave peer feedback they learnt to appreciate their peers' work and also their own. It was also found that if teachers care for children and treat them well, it motivates them to write creatively and also builds confidence in them. The research experience indicated that it was possible to teach creative writing to nonnative speaker children if the focus was on pedagogy as well as and on emotions of the children as both readers and writers.