A Comparative Research Between Conventional and Islamic Bank System of Pakistan: Liquidity Risk Management

The function of the bank is differentiated into budgetary middle people, facilitator and supporters. Hence, the banks keep themselves as confided body to their trade and business partners. Assets hazard could emerge and to be seen out of such diverse tasks since they are entirely on stake in terms of accessibility. When assets are set out by the non-members supplementary actions are necessary to be taken by the Islamic banks in order to balance assets and liquidity with sharia standards. The purpose of this exploration is to find the liquidity risk associated to the dissolvability of finance based foundation in order to evaluate assets risk management via parallel evaluation between Islamic and other Pakistani banks. This paper inspects the significance of the magnitude of the bank, networking capital margin on equity, finical sufficiency plus return on Resources and Assets (RoA), along assets stake organization in conventional plus Islamic banks of the Pakistan. The investigation relays on auxiliary knowledge that is over the period of four years. For instance, during 2017-2018, the investigation explored positive, hence, less significant relationship of magnitude of the firm plus networking cash surge to net assets along with liquidity vulnerability in similar models. Moreover, financial competence share in other banks plus margin of assets in Islamic banks is found encouraging and prominent at ten percent 10% gradation equivalent.

Development and Validation of Deception As Conflict Management Scale - Dcmts

The main purpose of the study was to develop and validate a tool on the perceptions and the uses of deception; named: Deception as a Conflict Management Technique Scale (DCMTS). The scale attempted to measure deception with five dimensions: General Deception, Deception in Conflict Management, Self-Deception, Interpersonal Deception and Deception at Workplace. The scale development task was undertaken in three phases. Phase I operated starting with literature review, random input from people on the construct of deception and subject experts’ contribution to develop 50 item questionnaire. With a sample of 408 individuals selected through convenient random sampling the questionnaire was administered and data was collected and analyzed; on the basis of correlation values 35- item scale was formulated. Descriptive statistics, inter-item correlation, item total correlation, reliability analysis through Cronbach and exploratory factor analysis was done for all five sub scales. SEM was done and relative fit model was found. In phase 2, with a random sample of 103 individuals, test-retest analysis was calculated. In phase 3, construct validity: convergent and discriminant, was examined on a random sample of 135 individuals, by correlations with measures of jealousy, sandbagging, social desirability for convergent analysis; with honesty and integrity for discriminant validity. Findings provided support for the reliability and validity of Deception as Conflict Management Technique Scale. Results provided support for the reliability and validity of the Deception as Conflict Management Technique Scale. The outcomes and applications of the developed scale are discussed both in terms of theoretical and managerial implications. Allusions for further research are also stipulated.