ناصر کاظمی
ناصر کاظمی کا اصل نام سید ناصر رضا کاظمی تھا۔ ان کی ولادت 8 دسمبر 1925ء جبکہ وفات 2 مارچ 1972ء کو ہوئی۔گئے دنوں کا سراغ لیکر کدھر سے آیا، کدھر گیا وہ، عجیب مانوس اجنبی تھا مجھے تو حیران کرگیا وہ ،جیسے ہزاروں اشعار کے خالق اردوغزل کے رجحان ساز شاعر (۵۲۹۱ - ۲۷۹۱) ناصر رضا کاظمی انبالہ (پنجاب) میں پیدا ہوئے ان کا پورا نام سید ناصر رضا کاظمی تھا۔ ابتدائی تعلیم انبالہ میں ہوئی۔ اس کے بعد اسلامیہ کالج لاہور میں زیر تعلیم رہے۔ اعلیٰ تعلیم کی تکمیل نہ ہو سکی۔۔ ۱۹۴۷ میں تقسیم ہند کے بعد لاہور میں سکونت اختیار کی۔ ناصر کاظمی نے 1939ء میں صرف سولہ سال کی عمرمیں لاہور ریڈیو کے ساتھ بطور اسکرپٹ رائٹر منسلک ہو ئے اور پھر آخری وقت تک کسی نہ کسی صورت ریڈیوپاکستان کے ساتھ منسلک رہے۔اسکے علاوہ وہ مختلف ادبی جریدوں، اوراق نو، ہمایوں اور خیال کے مدیر بھی رہے۔شعر گوئی کا آغاز جوانی میں ہو گیا تھا۔ شاعری کے علاوہ موسیقی سے بھی گہری دلچسپی تھی۔
ناصر کاظمی نے اپنی تخلیقی زندگی کی ابتداء تیرہ برس کی عمر میں کی اور ابتداء میں اس زمانے کے معروف شاعر اخترشیرانی سے متاثرہوکر رومانوی نظمیں اور پھر غزلیں کہیں۔اور میر تقی میر کو اپنا مرشد سمجھا یہی وجہ ہے کہ شاعری میں میر تقی میر کی شاعری کا عکس نظر آتا ہے۔
قیام پاکستان کے بعد ان کے اشعار کی مہک گوشے گوشے میں پھیل گئی اور پاکستان کو ناصر کاظمی کے روپ میں ایک نیا شاعر نصیب ہوا۔ ناصر کاظمی نے پیروی میر کرتے ہوئے اپنے سادہ اسلوب ،قادرالکلامی ،ندرت خیال، سچے جذبوں اور احساسات کی بدولت اردو غزل کا دامن ایسے ایسے تابدار موتیوں سے بھر دیا ہے کہ اردو ادب کی تاریخ میں امر ہو گئے۔کپڑے بدل کر جاؤں کہاں،...
Manuscript is a handwritten book. The writer of such book is known as "khattat". In the field of research editing and Makhtoota hold primary position. No research is possible without it. Editing is the farther goal than research. Therefore, being an expert in the manuscript is an obligatory factor for editing Manuscripts are the richest treasure of the human civilization, and their great contribution. They are the chronological records of past memories, incidents and circumstances. They need great expertise to understand these. A person who is not capable expert of manuscripts, he can’t carry out the research or editing task effectively.
This qualitative case study investigated the classroom practices of two English language teachers from Gilgit-Baltistan to understand what shaped their practices of teaching formal writing at the higher secondary level to identify what their current practices of teaching writing in use and the factors that hinder or help students’ formal writing skills according to the participants. The data were gathered through semi-structured interviews, focus group discussions, classroom observations, document analysis and field notes. Analyses of the data suggest that contrary to the traditional lecture practice, the participants use various approaches such as, Integration of product and process approach, communicative language teaching, technology integration, co-operative teaching approach, and student-centred teaching in the classroom. Their teaching, however, was dominated by an integrated approach of product and process to develop formal writing skill at higher secondary (11) level. The study participants believe that sharing model texts help students in gaining a deeper understanding of the assigned writing tasks. However, there remain some apparent factors which hinder teachers’ practices in the learning process. Because of these hinders, multiple approaches being used show little improvement in the case of composition writing of struggling students and their motivation. This research work calls teachers to be more informed about these approaches in order to engage the students fully in meaningful writing exercises. It is evident from the findings that students, on the other hand, take formal writing skill development for granted and fritter the time provided by the teacher in trivial activities. Therefore, this study recommends that teachers and students need to spend more time in building a strong base in the form of background knowledge and vocabulary to help the students remember, recognize, apply and create coherent, meaningful and error-free written compositions. teaching formal writing at the higher secondary level to identify what their current practices of teaching writing in use and the factors that hinder or help students’ formal writing skills according to the participants. The data were gathered through semi-structured interviews, focus group discussions, classroom observations, document analysis and field notes. Analyses of the data suggest that contrary to the traditional lecture practice, the participants use various approaches such as, Integration of product and process approach, communicative language teaching, technology integration, co-operative teaching approach, and student-centred teaching in the classroom. Their teaching, however, was dominated by an integrated approach of product and process to develop formal writing skill at higher secondary (11) level. The