مسيحيت اور اسلام ميں تصور گناہ

God has given us two kinds of commandments "al-awaamir wan-nawaahi" i.e. Biddings and forbiddings whose violation is called "sin”. Christianity and Islam both are divine religions and their teachings are God-gifted. Their followers are required to lead their lives according to the commandments of God in order to succeed. But with the passage of time, Christians started distortions within their law. They, therefore, promoted the belief that every man is a sinner by birth. Christians believe that Adam (PBUH) committed sin. Islam teaches that every child is innocent by birth. The holy Prophet (BPBUM) said: “Every child is born on Islamic nature and his parents cause him to be Christian, Jew or Magian". Despite being distorted, Christianity does possess yet such teachings that resemble Islamic teachings. If these teachings are followed the mankind can be reformed though these teachings have its limitations. Islam is a final and ultimate religion and its teachings are, valid up to the day of resurrection. Also, these teachings have not been distorted. Islam has described each and every sin in detail more than the Christianity. If one follows Islamic teachings be can achieve success and salvation.

The Role of Military in Politics: Institutionalizing Civilian Control over Pakistans Military

Unless we compare we cannot identify? So for all those who propagate the theme of ''leave the army alone'' or ''stop army bashing'' in the name of patriotism I can only say that this will do no good to an institution whose identity is undergoing a change and which needs to be debated. After all here was an army that not very long ago, created maintained and executed proxies to try and achieve its strategic ends. If it is now growing up to realize the fruitlessness of this failed strategy and the harm that it has brought to the country than is it not a sign of change? For the army and its senior military leadership it will be no mean task to break away from the ideological and strategic frontiers that has taken it decades to build, consolidate and reside within. Drawing comparison between the army of the past and today will only help army to build on its resolve and ability to bring about a change in its character and functions; from an army accused of periodical political interference''s and running the governments to the army now ready to cede to the civilian control. The question that I investigate is ‘Will military cede to civilian control?’ The army may have finally realized that subordinating itself to the civilian control is actually the best method to both win public approval as well as safeguard its institutional interests. Subordination to civilian authority will not be easy if the officer corps especially the senior military officers don''t accept that, ‘civilians too can make mistakes’. If our military has learnt from its history than today it definitely has an opportunity to build on the good work it has done so far on the matter of civilian and democratic rehabilitation by distancing itself from the politics. In fact an important benchmark on the change in the future behavior of the army would be the difficulty to distinguish on important policy matters, the views of the army from those of the civilian rulers. On termination of General Musharaf’s military rule two important measures were taken by the civilian government; it appointed a President that belonged and was leading a ruling party; the separation of the post of Prime Minister and the Defence Minister. The presidency which in the past was military compliant when worn as a crown by the leadership of the party became an important stabilizing factor to combat all crisis situations. The separation of the post of Defence Minister ensured bringing in an intermediary only through whom the army chief now reported to the Prime Minister, to whom he previously reported directly. These were institutionalized methods of control exercised by the government unlike some other dreadful efforts like bringing ISI under the ministry of interior and imposing the Kerry Lugar conditioned formalities on the army. These actions by the government amply demonstrate how well planned as well as poorly conducted methods employed to control the military by the civilian government could be. These had far reaching strategic and political consequences for the country in the past and if managed poorly they will continue to adversely affect the nature of civil-military relationship in future as well. Institutionalization of control that the civilians may exercise over the military in Pakistan will stretch over a long duration. Both civilians as well as military leaders will have to understand the benefits of this process. Democracy is still in a state of infancy in Pakistan but it is the only system of government that can help Pakistan to combat the many problems it faces today. For democracy to consolidate in Pakistan the military must subordinate to the civilian authority. The Dissertation suggests the ways and means to achieve it.