Search or add a thesis

Advanced Search (Beta)
Home > اصول فقہ میں مسلک -فقہیہ کے مشترکات تقابلی جائزہ ادلہ جتہاد ک تناظر میں .

اصول فقہ میں مسلک -فقہیہ کے مشترکات تقابلی جائزہ ادلہ جتہاد ک تناظر میں .

Thesis Info

Access Option

External Link

Author

ندیم عباس

Program

PhD

Institute

National University of Modern Languages

City

Islamabad

Province

Islamabad

Country

Pakistan

Thesis Completing Year

2016

Thesis Completion Status

Completed

Subject

Islamic Studies

Language

Urdu

Link

http://prr.hec.gov.pk/jspui/bitstream/123456789/13690/1/Nadeem_Abbas_Islamic_Studies_2016_NUML_22.06.2016.pdf

Other

Romanized Title: Usool-E-Fiqh Mein Mesalik -E-Fiqhiya K Mushtraqat (Taqabli Jaiza Adila-E-Ijtehad K Tanazur Mein) .

Added

2021-02-17 19:49:13

Modified

2024-03-24 20:25:49

ARI ID

1676728125588

Asian Research Index Whatsapp Chanel
Asian Research Index Whatsapp Chanel

Join our Whatsapp Channel to get regular updates.

Similar


The purpose of this study is to investigate how different Islamic schools of thought interpret and derive basic principles in Islamic jurisprudence. It is believed that the Muslims set the principles of Islamic jurisprudence soon after the demise of the Prophet (s.a.w.w) of Islam. This branch of knowledge is actually a superb fusion of reasoning and imitation. It is the study of the arguments through which Islamic Sharia is interpreted and Islamic legislation is achieved. Most often, the debates involve doctrinal arguments, and all the existing Islamic schools of thought agree on the basic principles through which certain laws are derived from those debates. All the Islamic schools of thought agree that Qur’an is the final authority, and it is the Qur’an that provides the initial argument whenever some issue arises. Thus the Qur’an is the first and foremost source to provide an answer to any issue. However, the Hambli scholars ascribe authority to the Qura’an and the Sunnah, without making a clear distinction in order or rank between the two. The Sunnah is the second source for deriving doctrinal principles. All Islamic schools of thought agree that the Sunnah is an important and basic source for deriving the Sharia principles. The Sharia can be divided into two kinds: the first deals with the steady and gradual reporting which, according to every school of thought, adds to argumentative knowledge, and hence stands for authority in Islamic jurisprudence. The second kind involves personal reporting which depends on personal character for determining its truth-value. However, every school of thought takes it as authority once its truth-value is verified. For Hanfi school of thought, certain other conditions besides personal character are required in order to accept the personal reporting. The third most important source for deriving principles in Islamic jurisprudence is the community consensus. Every school of thought accepts the authority of the general consensus. Although most of the schools of thought agree on the authority of absolute consensus, the Malkis also take community consensus as an authority, i.e., if the community in Madina arrive at a consensus on some issue, it would be accepted as the authority. On the other hand, according to the Ja’fri school of thought, every consensus has attained authority with a ma’soom’s opinion in its favor. For the majority Ummah, reasoning is also regarded as authority for the derivation of the Sharia principles. According to Imam Ibne Hazam, logical reasoning is possible, but it is not recognized by the Sharia. On the other hand, the Ja’fri school of thought accepts the authority of both the mansoosul-illat reasoning and the awaliyat reasoning. As for the authority of istashab, all the Muslim states accept and set it as a precedence to implement the state laws. The Hanfis believe that only an accepted right can be explored and verified through istashab, and not a new one. All these are the basic principles that serve as authority in the Islamic jurisprudence. Every Islamic school of thought employs them for the interpretation and implementation of the Sharia.
Loading...
Loading...

Similar Books

Loading...

Similar Chapters

Loading...

Similar News

Loading...

Similar Articles

Loading...

Similar Article Headings

Loading...

استفہام بمعنیٰ تعجب

استفہام بمعنیٰ تعجب

استفہامیہ اسلوب تعجب کے لیے بھی استعمال ہوتا ہے جیسے آیت کریمہ:

"يَاأَيُّهَا الْإِنْسَانُ مَا غَرَّكَ بِرَبِّكَ الْكَرِيمِ"۔ [[1]]

"اے انسان تجھے کس چیز نے اپنے اس پروردگار کے معاملے میں دھوکا لگا دیا ہے جو بڑا کرم والا ہے ) میں استفہامیہ اسلوب اظہار تعجب کے لیے ہے کہ اگر خدا تمہیں برابر ڈھیل دے رہا ہے تو تم نے اس ذات کریمی سے بہت سخت دھوکا کھایا"۔

" أَيَحْسَبُ الْإِنْسَانُ أَلَّنْ نَجْمَعَ عِظَامَهُ”[[2]]

"کیا انسان یہ سمجھ رہا ہے کہ ہم اس کی ہڈیوں کو اکٹھا نہیں کر سکیں گے؟"

"أَيَحْسَبُ الْإِنْسَانُ أَنْ يُتْرَكَ سُدًى “[[3]]

"کیا انسان یہ سمجھتا ہے کہ اسے یونہی چھوڑ دیا جائے گا؟"۔

ان آیات میں اللہ تعالیٰ حیرت و استعجاب کے ساتھ کہ رہا ہے کہ انسان آفاق وانفس کی تمام نشانیوں اور اپنی خلقت و ممات کو دیکھتے ہوئے بعث بعد الموت کے بارے میں شک میں پڑا ہوا ہے کیا اسے یہ پوری کائنات نظر نہیں آتی۔ کیا اسے غیر مسؤل چھوڑ دیا جائے گا۔

" مَا لَكُمْ كَيْفَ تَحْكُمُونَ"[[4]]

"تمہیں کیا ہو گیا ہے ؟ تم کیسی باتیں طے کر لیتے ہو "۔

یہ متکبرین سے بانداز تعجب سوال ہے کہ تمہیں کیا ہو گیا ہے کس طرح کے فیصلے کرنے لگے ہو کہ آخرت اور جزا سزا کو نہیں مانتے ۔

" لِأَيِّ يَوْمٍ أُجِّلَتْ ، لِيَوْمِ الْفَصْلِ"۔ [

The Concept of Medical Treatment and Guidelines for Physicians in Islamic Perspective

In fact, good health is the ultimate end of medicine for everyone through medical treatment. Islam does approve necessary measures to sustain good health. Thus its sustenance senses the subjects to avoid undue pains and sufferings. For this purpose medications and medical treatment is measured as a recognized tool in Islamic law. Therefore, this research paper reveals that numerous Muslim scientists worked on different branches of science,  and hence the Muslim physicians execute one of the most complicated “eye surgery” almost six hundred (600) years earlier than the European physicians. Indeed, it is the Muslim scientists who discovered the ‘force of gravity’, ‘blood circulation’, ‘laws of motion’. Factually, they developed the ‘theory of evolution’, ‘differential and integral mathematics’ and many more in the field of science. Consequently, the words of Campbell in this regard are very important to note that: “the European medical system is Arabian not only in origin but also in its structure”, which signify that “Muslim scientists are directly responsible for the European renaissance”. Resultantly, this paper argues that ‘medical treatment is an obligation if one’s life is in danger’ since preservation and protection of life is one of the primary objectives of Shariah. Although, in extraordinary circumstances, seeking medical treatment is highly encouraged in Islam, and an ill person is supposed to pursue medical treatment because Allah almighty has made both the illness and the cure.

Dual Career Couples With Impact on Marital Quality and Career Satisfaction in Peshawar, Pakistan

Since fifty years or so, many studies had examined the interplay between occupational role and familial responsibilities in dual career couples, however the phenomena is yet to be explored in the context of Pakistan. This study was planned with the aim to explore the impact of role conflict (work to family and family to work conflict) on marital quality and career satisfaction of duel career couples. The study also aimed to explore that to what extent coping mechanisms are associated with role conflict, marital quality, career satisfaction and how these are experienced by respondents having various demographic features. Data was collected from 388 respondents who were selected through purposive sampling while using snowball technique in the targeted 6 public sector universities and 3 hospitals in the city of Peshawar, Khyber Pakhtunkhwa of Pakistan. A group of theories was reviewed including role strain, theory of role differentiation, theory of asymmetric permeability and expansion/scarcity hypotheses to guide this study.A sequential explanatory design of Mixed Method Research (MMR) was used to collect quantitative data by using a questionnaire and qualitative data through in-depth interviews. Statistical analysis was performed through Chi-square test, Regression analysis, T-test, ANOVA and correlation for exploring association and relation between the selected variables. A significant and negative association was found between family to work conflict (FWC) and marital quality while highly significant and negative associations were obtained with career satisfaction. Similarly, work to family conflict (WFC) was found highly significant and negatively associated with all the items loaded on the components of marital quality while found in less significant association with items loaded on the components of career satisfaction. It was also found through regression analysis that family to work and work to family conflict was significantly while negatively directed with marital satisfaction, communication, togetherness and positively related with marital disagreements. Furthermore, family to work conflict was significantly and negatively associated with career happiness, motivation and job involvement. Similarly, role conflict was found in significant and negative association with coping mechanisms while a significant positive association was obtained between coping mechanisms, marital quality and career satisfaction. It was concluded from the data obtained through T-test and ANOVA that role conflict, marital quality and career satisfaction was experienced differently by respondents having various demographic characteristics. Additionally, the data collected from the study participants through indepth interviews in the form of narratives were found in consonance with our statistical findings. The themes of the study were including 1) Role balancing is difficult; 2) Family stresses have negative implications on the job; 3) We have a happy marriage, but role overload is problematic; 4) Child care is difficult to manage with occupational role; 5) We have little but quality time together: 6) Job schedule is difficult while family responsibilities are flexible; 7) Disagreements erupts but we respond with coping; 8) Friendly communication is helpful: 9) Coping mechanisms are very useful. Considering the findings obtained from all the statistical models and in-depth interviews that family to work and work to family conflict was significantly reducing the level of marital satisfaction, marital togetherness and marital communication while causing marital disagreements in dual career couples. Likewise, family related problems and work induced stresses had certain negative outcomes for career happiness, motivation and job involvement while coping mechanisms positively negotiate the carryover of role permeability in dual career couples. Our findings support the major assumptions of the role strain theory and scarcity hypotheses by suggesting that role conflict significantly mitigate the marital quality and career satisfaction of dual career couples. Likewise, our findings supported the theory of asymmetric permeability by outlining that work related stresses were more likely permeating to cause unrest in the family because the family domain was more flexible to absorb stresses than work domain. It is recommended that medical and academic institutions should specifically formulate policies to address issues and problems of dual career couples so that their potential may be utilized for the betterment of organisations, families and society. These include flexible and favorable recruitment policies, provision of baby care and counseling centers within these settings.