مشکوٰۃ المصابیح پر شیخ عبدالحق محدث دہلوی کے کام کا جائزہ

"Mishkāt al-Maṣābīḥ" has a sound rank among the Hadith collections. Its importance can be gauged from the fact that it has been described and summarized by several scholars. The works of Sheikh Abdul Haq Muḥaddith Dehlavi over that is a great contribution and have a special place in the context of his Hadith services. He is one of the prominent muhaddithin of the Subcontinent. He was pioneer in teaching and disseminating Hadith knowledge in the subcontinent. Firstly, he described the Mishkāt al-Maṣābīḥ in the Persian language of that time, which gained immense popularity among the people and increased the taste for understanding Hadith. Secondly, He accumulated a treasure trove of mysteries and secrets in Arabic for the use of Researchers. The name of the Persian commentary is Ash‘atul Lam‘āt while the Arabic commentary is called Lam‘āt al-Tanqīh. They are more than one in usefulness, which has created a taste for reading and understanding Hadith among the people and Researchers. In the said article, an introduction and methodological study of the work done by Sheikh Abdul Haq on Mishkāt al-Maṣābīḥ will be presented.

Sino-Russian Policies in the Centre and Periphery: A Comparative Analysis

The thesis entitled “Sino-Russian Policies in the Centre and Periphery: A Comparative Analysis”, shall focus on different aspects of the peripheries of Russia and China. For a thorough understanding, a selective number of areas have been chosen from the two states’ peripheries. The regions selected for the study of Russian periphery lie in the northwest Caucasus, namely; Dagestan, Chechnya, Ingushetia and Kabardino-Balkaria. In the case of China, Tibet Autonomous Region, Xinjiang Uyghur Autonomous Region, Hong Kong and Taiwan will be discussed in detail. The significance of the above mentioned territories lie in the unique nature of their relationship with their respective centres. The policies devised by the centre, which lie at notable distance from these regions, are often regarded with skepticism and doubt. The selected Russian peripheries of northwest Caucasus, Tibet and Xinjiang, which experience a rather uneasy relation with Moscow and Beijing respectively, also carry huge significance for the national governments, for these regions are immensely rich in natural resources including oil and gas. Moreover, these regions also serve as hydrocarbon conduits, thus adding to their significance. In addition to this, the above named territories lie in such a geographical arrangement that they become extremely important in the respective national policy framework of the two countries. Although, both Russia and China have colossal opportunities in these regions but the perturbed state of affairs present both governments with immense challenges to conduct their policies in the best interest of the country. (xvi) While Hong Kong’s relations with Beijing are smooth and comfortable, but in the recent past, the centre’s attempts to exercise CCP’s principles in the island territory have caused friction in the relations between the island territory and the mainland. As for the case of Taiwan, historical dispute between the two governments has come between, time and again, in smooth bilateral relations across the strait, whereas comfortable relations between the two are especially important for China’s ever growing economy. Moreover, both China and Russia, which share a communist past, also share a similar attitude in handling matters related to expression and religion in the above mentioned peripheries inhabited by ethnic minorities. In addition, China and Russia, lying at close proximity with each other share common interests and apprehensions in the context of regional and trans-regional politics. These factors have brought the two countries together in political and economic spheres. This thesis also discusses the potential of Sino-Russian partnership in the region in view of regional geo-political milieu and of countering non-regional hegemony in the region. This research focuses on the policies of Russia and China in these disturbed peripheries. It brings to light how measures designed in the centre for the management of these peripheries are implemented in these regions of Russia and China and why such policies have often failed in bringing about the desired results. It also highlights the areas of trouble in Beijing’s and Moscow’s political framework and the policies designed by the respective centres to counter them, as well as the commonalities and differences in these policies. As both Russia and China occupy a significant position in world politics, it is important to understand the problems faced by their leadership within the borders and (xvii) also in their individual peripheries, as these challenges also have serious effects on the two countries’ global reputation. By using historical references and quantitative research methods, the research is a sincere endeavor at bringing out a clearer and unbiased picture of the challenges and possible solutions to the problems in these two similar-to-an-extent societies.