مولانا عبدالحفیظ بلیاوی
ابھی چند روز ہوئے (۲۶ ؍جولائی کو) مولانا عبدالحفیظ صاحب بلیاوی بھی ہم کوداغِ مفارقت دے گئے۔انا ﷲ وانا الیہ راجعون۔ مرحوم دارالعلوم دیوبند کے قدیم فارغ التحصیل تھے اوراب ادھر ایک عرصہ سے ندوۃ العلماء لکھنؤ میں عربی زبان وادب اوردوسرے علوم وفنون دینیہ کے نامور استاد تھے۔استعداد بڑی پختہ تھی اورمطالعہ وسیع تھا۔عربی زبان وادب کاذوق فطری تھا جس کی شاہد عدل ان کی مشہور متداول کتاب ’’مصباح اللغات ‘‘مطبوعہ مکتبہ برہان ہے اور جس پران کو وزارت تعلیم اور یوپی گورنمنٹ کی طرف سے انعامات بھی ملے تھے۔ طبعاً بڑے متواضع، خوددار اور خلیق و ملنسار تھے۔ ابھی گزشتہ مئی کی ۱۷؍ تاریخ کوان کی قیام گاہ پران سے ملاقات ہوئی تھی ۔چند ماہ سے بیمار تھے لیکن اس وقت اس کا خیال بھی نہیں تھاکہ یوم موعود اتنا قریب ہے۔ اﷲ تعالیٰ ابرار وصلحا ء کامقام جلیل عطا فرمائے ۔آمین [اگست ۱۹۷۱ء]
Muhammad ibn ‘Umr Al-Wqid is considered to be one of the most famous early Muslim historians. Despite being disputed among the circle of Muhaddithn, he was popular among the early Muslim historians. He got recognition and fame as a historian in the 2nd half of 2nd century of Hijrah. In fact, he was an outstanding historian who introduced new trends in writing and composition of historic narratives. The early Muslim historians cited and quoted Al-Wqid freely where they needed him without any kind of reluctance. It is well to know that western orientalists pay special attention to AlWqid and his book "Al-Maghz ". Perhaps it is not due to their biasness or impartiality, but for the excellent work of Al-Wqid. In this regard, they think that Al-Wqid is more accurate and clear in giving details and judgments about historical events than any other early Muslim historian. Al-Wqid 's dating of historical events is more acute and correct. He owns what he produces and narrates. Moreover, he seems to be sensitive and aware of consequences of what he writes in his book " Al-Maghz ", that is why we see him sometime indulging in some issues extra-ordinarily and proving and disproving what he thinks right or wrong by logical (internal and external) criticism. Al-Wqid explores historical events and tries to know about root causes of their happening and finally analyzes their consequences. These are some special qualities of Al-Wqid 's work in the eyes of western orientalists. In this article, I have tried to highlight these aspects of Al-Wqid 's work from the oriental literature.
Relations between the United States and Pakistan have a long history spread over nearly six decades. Though these relations have seen various phases of engagements and estrangements, this study takes into account the changing facets of the US- Pakistan relations in the wake of the collapse of Soviet Union in early 1990s till 9/11(2001). The era under focus saw the acute type of estrangement between the two states. In the changed geostrategic scenario, the US strategic priorities had changed. Pakistan lost her strategic worth for the US policymakers. The issue of Pakistan’s controversial nuclear program resurfaced that further pushed these states apart from each other. Pressler Amendment (1985) was invoked by the US and sanctions were applied against Pakistan. Based on such a policy, all the US economic and military assistance to Pakistan was completely choked. The US policy of nuclear non- proliferation was vigorously brought into play. However, these coercive measures proved counterproductive and Pakistan became an overt nuclear state in May 1998. Nuclear proliferation was another manifestation of the failure of this US policy. In late 1990s, terrorism caught US attention and it became a focal point of her foreign policy. To eliminate this menace, Pakistan was urged to help American agencies. But this further heightened tension between them. Thus, US-Pakistan relations were greatly marred throughout the 1990s. This dissertation analyzes the causes and effects of the event-related ties between Pakistan and the United States and founds the divergence of interests as the main cause of trust deficit in their relationship. The US agenda was global while Pakistan sought after her narrow local objectives. But both wished national security for their nations. It explores how the US policy of sanctions towards Pakistan failed and gave rise to nuclear proliferation. It evaluates the economic, social, political costs of the US benign neglect towards Pakistan. Due to the US strategic myopia, Pakistan’s strategic worth was overlooked that gave terrorism a chance to flourish in the region. This study specially highlights the main areas of conflict and cooperation between Pakistan and the United States and enumerates the ways and means to mitigate the misperceptions between them. Some policy recommendations are also put forward to convert the US-Pakistan relations into strategic partnership characterized with equality and mutual co-existence.